Citgo Agrees to Pay $8M to Settle Spam Text Class Action
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act lawsuit was resolved only about a year after it was filed.
December 29, 2017 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Citgo Petroleum Corp. agreed to pay $8 million to settle a spam-texting class action that zipped from filing to final approval in just over a year.
West Palm Beach resident Matthew Gottlieb brought the case after receiving text messages advertising a chance to win free gas for a year through the Club Citgo mobile app. The Houston-based company sent the texts to about 93,000 people who signed up for Citgo-sponsored sweepstakes, according to the plaintiff.
The lawsuit alleged that Citgo sent the text messages using auto-dialing software in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Gottlieb also claimed he and other recipients did not give their consent to receive the messages just because they entered contests.
“You would go to [Coral Sky] Amphitheatre in West Palm Beach for a Dave Matthews concert, and you would see a sign saying, 'For a seat upgrade, text Citgo,' ” said one of Gottlieb's attorneys, Jeff Ostrow of Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert in Fort Lauderdale. Ostrow's colleagues Scott Edelsberg and Avi Kaufman also worked on the case, along with co-counsel Andrew Shamis of Shamis & Gentile in Miami.
Gottlieb, who is on the Do Not Call list, received three text messages in late 2016 and filed his lawsuit in November of that year.
“ His privacy was wrongfully invaded, and plaintiff has become understandably aggravated with having to deal with the frustration of unwanted text messages forcing him to divert attention away from his work and other activities,” the lawsuit claimed.
Class counsel reviewed more than 100,000 pages of documents from Citgo and collected information from the defendant's text-messaging vendors, mGage and Black Canyon.
“We learned that they're using computer software that a lot of companies are using, and right now there's a lot of litigation out there as to whether that's an auto-dialer,” Edelsberg said.
In a Northern District of Georgia case involving an Atlanta nightclub, a judge ruled in 2016 that mGage did not meet the Federal Communications Commission's definition of “auto-dialing” because the platform required human involvement. The same question is being examined in other TCPA lawsuits across the country.
In Gottlieb's case, the court did not decide the auto-dialing issue because the case settled so quickly. U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg in Fort Pierce moved things along by setting the trial for Dec. 4, 2017, putting the case on a one-year schedule instead of letting it stretch three or four years, Ostrow said.
“The court wasn't interested in entertaining any extensions,” he said. “So we got a lot of work done.”
The parties had two all-day sessions with mediator David Lichter of the Lichter Law Firm in Aventura. The case settled in July, and Rosenberg gave final approval Nov. 23.
Citgo agreed to pay $8 million to the class, which includes anyone who received the texts, regardless of whether they were on the Do Not Call list. The company will also foot the bill for about $300,000 in settlement administration fees. Class counsel will receive one-third of the payout, or about $2.67 million, in attorney fees.
“What they're having to pay far outweighs what they got out of the campaign,” Ostrow said. “From a business perspective, I don't believe they'll ever engage in a business practice like this again.”
Citgo and its Miami lawyers, Martin Goldberg and Greg Weintraub of Lash & Goldberg, did not respond to a request for comment. Chicago attorneys Scott Solberg and James Kylstra of Eimer Stahl also represented Citgo.
Case: Matthew Gottlieb v. Citgo Petroleum
Case no.: 9:16-cv-81911-RLR
Description: Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Filing date: Nov. 29, 2016
Final approval of settlement date: Nov. 23, 2017
Judge: U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg
Plaintiffs attorneys: Jeff Ostrow and Scott Edelsberg, Fort Lauderdale, Avi Kaufman, Coral Gables, Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert; Andrew Shamis, Shamis & Gentile, Miami
Defense attorneys: Martin Goldberg and Greg Weintraub, Lash & Goldberg, Miami; Scott Solberg and James Kylstra, Eimer Stahl, Chicago
Settlement amount: $8 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250