Appeals Court Gives Condo Associations Boost in Ruling Over Surpluses From Tax Deed Sales
The homeowner challenged an order granting the surplus funds to the association, arguing the creditor never recorded a claim of lien or moved to obtain a final judgment.
January 05, 2018 at 02:27 PM
3 minute read
Good news for Florida condo associations trying to recover from delinquent owners in foreclosure: An appellate ruling found associations have automatic liens, and don't need to take the extra step of recording claims to be considered prior lien holders entitled to surpluses in tax deed sales.
“It's a significant issue,” said condo association attorney Gregory Eisinger of Eisinger, Brown, Lewis, Frankel & Chaiet in Hollywood. “We're in front of courts all the time on this exact case.”
It's also an old issue that has divided Florida courts adjudicating the rights of condo association and how to prioritize their claims among multiple creditors in foreclosure.
The decision from the Fourth District Court of Appeal stemmed from litigation between unit owner Jennifer E. Calendar and Lauderhill-based Stonebridge Gardens Section III Condominium Association Inc.
Calendar defaulted on property tax payments, and her debt sold at a tax deed auction that left a roughly $25,000 surplus, disbursed to the condo association. She challenged the order granting the excess funds to Stonebridge Gardens, which had claimed Calendar owed for unpaid condo assessments. Calendar argued Stonebridge was not entitled to the surplus because it never recorded a claim of lien or moved to obtain a final judgment.
But the trial court ruled in Stonebridge's favor, and the appellate court agreed, finding Florida law gave the association a “statutory lien” under section 718.116(5)(a), which governs condominiums.
Under that statute, “The association has a lien on each condominium parcel to secure the payment of assessments,” and that lien takes effect from the moment the association issues its original declaration of condominium.
“Consequently … where a declaration of condominium is recorded, such as in the instant case, recording a claim of lien is not an absolute prerequisite to the enforcement of a lien for unpaid assessments,” former Fourth DCA Chief Judge Cory J. Ciklin wrote in a unanimous decision with Judges Robert M. Gross and Mark W. Klingensmith.
Court documents suggest Calendar will challenge the decision. Her attorney, Gilligan Gooding & Franjola shareholder George Franjola, filed a motion requesting an extended deadline to have the case reheard.
Meanwhile, condo association attorneys welcomed the ruling as a victory for associations hit hard by delinquent homeowners during the last housing market collapse.
“The association now has a recorded interest without having to file an actual claim of lien,” said Eisinger, who represented Stonebridge Gardens. “It doesn't have to do anything in these circumstances to protect its interests.”
The decision is the latest boon for condo associations. It follows a June 2016 ruling from the Fourth DCA that offered relief to associations grappling with the fallout of protracted lender foreclosures after hundreds of thousands of cases clogged the dockets beginning in 2008. Before that ruling, condo and other associations had been handicapped by lender claims, able only to attach their collection to other creditors' proceedings, instead of filing their own separate lawsuits. The 2016 ruling created new case law that clarified the legal precedent and cleared the way for associations to foreclose on liens for unpaid fees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250