Somalis Alleging Abuses by ICE Personnel Seek More Time in US
An American Civil Liberties Union attorney argued the 92 detainees would face terrorist threats if immediately returned to Somalia.
January 08, 2018 at 03:28 PM
4 minute read
Somalis who allege they were beaten on a deportation flight asked a Miami judge Monday to allow them to stay in the United States while they seek review of their removal orders.
Plaintiffs attorneys argue it would be dangerous for the 92 detainees to return to Somalia, particularly after widespread press coverage of the December flight that led to a lawsuit against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. An October bombing killed more than 300 people in Mogadishu, and Al-Shabaab militants are waiting to target the “Westernized” plaintiffs, attorney Lee Gelernt argued.
“It became impossible for these individuals to go back and go undercover,” Gelernt, deputy director of the Immigrants' Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, told U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles at Monday's hearing.
But Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee argues there is no constitutionally protected right in the Eleventh Circuit for the Somalis to stay in the country while their removal orders are reviewed. The motions to reopen that the plaintiffs want to file in immigration court are “disfavored” in the same way as a motion for rehearing or for a new trial, he said.
“Each of them had their day in court. … Each one of these orders is administratively final,” Lee said.
The hearing came after the detainees sued ICE on Dec. 18, alleging officials “kicked, struck, choked and dragged” them during a two-day deportation flight that was stopped in Senegal and forced to turn back to the U.S. Gayles previously stayed the deportation on Dec. 21 and ordered the government to provide adequate medical treatment for the detainees.
Gelernt asked the judge only to accept jurisdiction, following the example of Boston and Detroit courts which found that, under the U.S. Constitution's suspension clause, “changed circumstances” allowed for delayed deportation pending motions to reopen immigration cases.
He said the attorneys would need 30 days after the government provides immigration files for the detainees to file motions to reopen their cases. On top of terrorist threats, if the detainees are sent to Somalia, Gelernt argued they will have trouble finding attorneys and getting information from the U.S. government.
When Gayles asked if the government agreed the 92 Somalis risked serious injury or death if they were returned to Somalia immediately, Lee said the U.S. does not concede that. Only seven of the 92 detainees are named in the lawsuit they filed, and the other 85 would be tough to track down, Lee said.
Gelernt said Lee was speculating. Expert affidavits said the plaintiffs would face imminent danger if they were sent to Somalia.
Gayles did not rule from the bench, saying he would need until Jan. 22 to issue a written order. But he said in this case, removing the Somalis from the United States without giving them a chance to have their immigration cases reviewed “seems problematic.”
It's hard to dispute the Somalis' case is receiving media attention, Gayles said, drawing chuckles from spectators when he said he receives email alerts from Google whenever his name is mentioned in a news story.
“I've been getting consistent Google alerts for this case alone from international media,” he said.
The Somalis were also represented at the hearing by Rebecca Sharpless, director of the University of Miami School of Law's Immigration Clinic; Lisa Lehner of Americans for Immigrant Justice in Miami and Andrea Montavon-McKillip of Legal Aid Service of Broward County in Plantation, Florida.
Sharpless said the plaintiffs attorneys are separately challenging the adequacy of the detainees' medical care. She said she would file an administrative complaint Monday against the Glades County Detention Center in Moore Haven, Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250