Broad and Cassel: 170 Florida Attorneys in an Entrepreneurial Setting
This question-and-answer article is the first in an occasional series profiling midsize law firms in Florida.1. How big is your firm, where is…
January 10, 2018 at 11:47 AM
5 minute read
This question-and-answer article is the first in an occasional series profiling midsize law firms in Florida.
1. How big is your firm, where is it located, and what are its primary areas of
practice and focus?
Broad and Cassel is a full-service law firm serving clients worldwide from 10 offices across
the state of Florida in Boca Raton, Destin, Fort Lauderdale, Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, Palm
Beach, Tallahassee, Tampa and West Palm Beach. Founded by Alvin Cassel and Shepard
Broad in 1946, the firm has more than 170 attorneys who provide legal support and business
counsel spanning 25 areas of law and serving more than 20 industries.
The primary areas of practice and focus are:
* Affordable housing
* Corporate and finance
* Estate planning
* Health law
* Litigation
* Real estate
2. Please explain your firm's governance structure and compensation model.
A management committee, comprised of key partners led by chairman C. David Brown II, governs the firm's operations.
3. What do you view as the two biggest opportunities for your firm, and what are
the two biggest threats?
Change is the only constant, and over the years Broad and Cassel has made several
strategic decisions that have helped the firm maintain a competitive advantage. The
most vital strategy over the course of the firm's more than 70 years has been the ability
to adapt to a shifting marketplace, and over time the practice areas have grown
strategically to better serve clients. In addition to this responsiveness to change,
maintaining a strong capital base has enabled Broad and Cassel to weather multiple
recessions and attract laterals.
Opportunities: Looking ahead, we expect to continue recruiting great talent. Several
lateral hires in 2017 have positioned us well in key practice areas, including the
creation of a new health care insolvency service for the firm. We'll sustain this
momentum into 2018.
Over the last decade, the need for highly specialized legal experts in the health care
field has increased dramatically. We've seized on that, acquired the talent and built one
of the most experienced and diversified health law groups in the Southeastern United
States. Using our health law practice as a successful model, we plan to capitalize on the
high-growth areas to further build other practice areas to be as robust as health law.
Threats: A trend we're seeing is the introduction of artificial intelligence in our industry.
We have highly specialized legal practices where companies come to us for very
sophisticated, outside-the-box thinking where artificial intelligence will not be able to
replace human interaction. Embracing technology to empower our attorneys is key to
future success, but so too is human interaction with our clients.
4. After the recession hit, the prevailing theory was that midsize firms would start
to see more work come their way from large clients who could no longer justify
paying Big Law rates. What has been your experience?
In our experience, what has driven new and repeat clients is stellar client service. Yes,
we have localized rate structures and more reasonable rates than national firms.
However, our focus has always been and will remain on surpassing client expectations
and helping them achieve their goals. We're very lean in how we operate and because
of that it gives our clients great customer service. Our approach is really simple: serve
not only as problem solvers but also trusted advisers.
5. There is much debate around how law firms can foster the next generation of
legal talent. What advantages and disadvantages do midsize firms have in
attracting and retaining young lawyers, particularly millennials?
It's about opportunity. Midsize firms offer more opportunities for young lawyers to learn
and grow, providing greater access to clients that you wouldn't have in a larger firm and
the ability to be involved in large matters. Young attorneys get the opportunity to
perform in front of clients at a much quicker pace.
At Broad and Cassel, our attorneys thrive in an entrepreneurial setting. We empower
them with the tools they need to excel as entrepreneurs themselves. In short, our
attorneys must own their business to succeed in this organization. This provides young
attorneys with a great learning opportunity and flexibility to manage their own practice.
6. Does your firm employ any nonlawyer professionals in high-level positions
(e.g. COO, business development officer, chief strategy officer, etc.)? If so, why is
it advantageous to have a nonlawyer in that role? If not, have you considered
hiring any?
Yes. Our chief operating officer and chief financial officer have helped manage the day-
to-day operations of the firm for more than 20 years. Their focus on operations allows
our attorneys to concentrate on what matters most: our clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readNonequity Tiers Are Growing, but These Big Firms Say Path to Equity Remains the Same
6 minute read'Harder to Justify' Counsel Tiers in Big Law, Amid Focus on Nonequity Partners, Lateral Recruiting
Trending Stories
- 1‘Not a Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block in Mass Arb Dispute
- 2A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 3Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
- 4Phila. Judge Upholds $68.5M Verdict Over Construction Worker's Death
- 5Biden Vetoes Bill to Create More Federal Judgeships
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250