Hollywood Beach Resort Associations Sue Ex-Property Manager
The hotel and timeshare property is suing KW Property Management & Consulting, which is accused of helping divert association funds.
January 11, 2018 at 03:06 PM
5 minute read
The beachfront Hollywood Beach Resort hotel and timeshare is embattled in lawsuits, and the latest alleges a former management company turned a blind eye to improper dealings by former board members and aided the diversion of association money.
The Hollywood Beach Resort Condominium Association Inc. and the Hollywood Beach Hotels Owners Association Inc. are suing former association manager KW Property Management LLC in Miami-Dade Circuit Court.
The company, also called KW Property Management & Consulting, is a Miami-based association management company.
The resort at 101 N. Ocean Drive has two commercial units, 1,976 timeshare units and 360 condominiums, which operate as a hotel, according to attorney Gregory Elder of the Law Offices of Gregory R. Elder in Fort Lauderdale, who filed the complaint.
The Hollywood Beach Hotels Owners Association oversees the common areas and timeshares and represents the condo, timeshare and commercial owners. It is the master association over the Hollywood Beach Resort Condominium Association, which oversees the residential condos and represents their owners, according to the complaint.
In March 2011, the associations hired KW Property to manage association activities, collect and allocate assessments, prepare financial records and help with budgeting, according to the complaint. The Dec. 23 complaint insists the company failed at the tasks. The complaint lists breach-of-fiduciary duty and breach-of-contract counts.
Among the allegations is that former association board members conducted business in secret, and one illegally signed a lease for a commercial unit as well as a next-door bar and pool to run a hotel, bar and restaurant business, all on behalf of the associations, according to the complaint.
Decisions were made at closed-door meetings. While the rental program was disclosed, the lease wasn't properly disclosed, Elder said. The next-door bar and pool aren't owned by resort but are accessible to hotel and timeshare guests.
“Under the law you cannot lease or purchase off-site property without a vote of the unit owners,” he said. The lease “contains a reduction of assessments to one of the commercial unit owners without giving the other unit owners a proportionate reduction.”
KW Property was present at the closed-door meetings and knew of the commercial lease but did nothing to protect the rights of the associations and unit owners, according to the complaint.
When the leased bar, restaurant and hotel businesses started to fail, the former board members misappropriated money from association reserves to prop up the businesses, and KW Property helped by issuing checks and changing balance sheets to make it look like there was more money in the reserves, the complaint alleged.
KW Property attorney Frank Simone of Frank Simone P.A. in Miami said a complaint hasn't been served, and he denied the allegations outlined in an email.
“KW Property Management never received prior notices of such allegations. And if served with a complaint, KW Property Management will vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit, which has no valid basis,” Simone said. “I don't see any of it as being true.”
It's unclear exactly how KW Property and the associations parted ways.
KW Property started working at the property in April 2011, a month after signing contracts with the associations, and was terminated in early 2016, according to the complaint. Two months later the associations rehired KW Property, but it quit later that year, according to the complaint.
KW Property said it was never fired, but it parted ways with the associations in an email and accompanying resignation letter sent Oct. 21, 2016, effective Jan. 31, 2017, according to records Simone emailed to the Daily Business Review.
Simone said the associations have been involved in other lawsuits.
One was filed by the associations against former board members Michel Jekic and Laura Welliver, who were accused of arranging the closed-door meetings to discuss the business lease and not properly disclosing the lease. The lawsuit was filed in 2015 in Broward Circuit Court and amended in last month.
Stefanie S. Copelow, a West Palm Beach associate with Cole, Scott & Kissane, is listed as counsel for Jekic. She didn't return a request for comment by deadline.
Dale L. Friedman, a partner with Conroy Simberg in Hollywood and one of the attorneys who represents Welliver, declined to comment.
Separately, the owner of one of the commercial units at Hollywood Beach Resort sued the associations in Broward Circuit Court in 2016.
The latest lawsuit against KW Property was filed in Miami because the contract dictates that any litigation must be filed in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The complaint requests a jury trial even though the contract states the two sides waive the right to a jury trial, records show.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250