Broward Firm Sues Singer David Cassidy's Estate Over Unpaid Legal Fees
"The law firm that he hired to defend him for not paying our bill, he ended up not paying them either," attorney Brian Rodier said.
January 16, 2018 at 01:57 PM
3 minute read
A Fort Lauderdale law firm that once defended former singer, actor and television star David Cassidy against allegations of unpaid legal fees has filed its own claim against the one-time teen heartthrob's estate.
Saavedra Goodwin was Cassidy's counsel in a 2013 lawsuit by Hallandale-based Rodier & Rodier P.A., which claimed Cassidy “refused to pay” a balance of more than $109,221.
But now, Saavedra Goodwin is claiming the star owed more than $19,000 for its work on that case. The Blast, which reports on celebrity news, broke the story about the second law firm claim.
Cassidy, who died Nov. 21 from organ failure, was the star of the 1970s hit television series, “The Partridge Family.” Court records suggest financial struggles that led to the $1.85 million sale of his waterfront Fort Lauderdale estate at auction in 2015 as part of a bankruptcy case.
The court dismissed the bankruptcy, but did not discharge the law firm debt, leaving the claims in play. Now, the star's financial troubles will survive his death, as both law firms filed notifications to the probate court, signalling their intention to initiate claims against his estate.
On Wednesday Rodier & Rodier will seek to substitute Cassidy's estate as the defendant in its ongoing lawsuit against him.
“What's interesting is that when I filed my lawsuit for not paying his legal bills, (Cassidy) hired the other law firm—(which is) making a claim against the estate now because he didn't pay them either,” Rodier & Rodier partner Brian Rodier said. “So the law firm that he hired to defend him for not paying our bill, he ended up not paying them either. That tells you everything you need to know about this case.”
Court documents show Rodier & Rodier handled Cassidy's defense in a suit by plaintiff Edward Lipton, who alleged material misrepresentation, breach of oral contract, unfair and deceptive trade practices and breach of fiduciary duty. The firm claimed Cassidy paid $25,000 on a bill of about $134,000. By the time the Rodier & Rodier filed its amended complaint in April 2013, prejudgment interest stood at about $5,430—a figure that would have mounted in the last four years.
Cassidy engaged the Saavedra firm to file an answer with five affirmative defenses and a separate motion to dismiss the Rodier & Rodier suit for failure to state a cause of action. Among other defenses, he argued Rodier & Rodier had missed the deadline to sue under Florida's statute of limitations.
“We are fighting that lawsuit,” Jordan I. Wagner, the Fort Lauderdale attorney representing Cassidy's estate, said Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElite Boutiques Competing More With Big Law Bonuses, With Several Going Above Market
9 minute readIt's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 2Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 3Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 4Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 5Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250