Broward County Selects Legal Team to Spearhead Opioid Litigation
The winning team of five law firms combines nationally known plaintiffs lawyers and deep ties to Fort Lauderdale.
January 23, 2018 at 05:27 PM
3 minute read
The Broward County Commission approved a team of five law firms to pursue litigation against pharmaceutical companies over their alleged role in the opioid crisis.
The team of outside counsel chosen Tuesday is composed of Haliczer Pettis & Schwamm, Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Morgan & Morgan and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd. The attorneys will represent the county and the city of Fort Lauderdale.
“We're honored to have been selected by Broward County to represent it in this historic undertaking and look forward to playing a part with it in hopefully crafting a solution to what is an epidemic that has had disastrous impact on all of our communities,” said Kopelowitz Ostrow shareholder Bobby Gilbert of Coral Gables.
The group emphasized its local ties, its diversity and the fact that three of its lawyers serve as plaintiffs leadership for the opioid multidistrict litigation consolidated in Ohio. The three are Elizabeth Cabraser of Lieff Cabraser in San Francisco, Paul Geller of Robbins Geller in Boca Raton, and James Young of Morgan & Morgan in Jacksonville.
Lieff Cabraser and Robbins Geller were initially on a competing team, but the groups merged to have a better shot, Gilbert said. Lieff Cabraser does not have a Florida office, while Robbins Geller is a national firm with a Boca Raton location. The other three firms all have Fort Lauderdale offices.
“What we brought to the table were extensive local contacts, deep roots in Broward County, deep connections to county agencies and to the people of Florida in general,” Gilbert said. “What our new partners in the team brought were national prominence at the highest caliber.”
Both of the other teams who fought for the commission's vote also included MDL plaintiffs' leadership. Motley Rice, Gelber Schachter & Greenberg, and Colson Hicks Eidson made up one team and Simmons Hanly Conroy, Crueger Dickinson, and von Briesen & Roper was the other.
The contract will include a contingency arrangement that caps attorney fees at 25 percent of the net recovery, according to the county. The team will also advance the expenses of the litigation, which will be repaid only out of any financial recovery, among other contract terms.
Broward County will decide where to file the litigation, but it will likely be filed in federal court and become part of the MDL, Gilbert said.
The county intends to sue the same pharmaceutical companies defending opioid litigation around the country, Kopelowitz Ostrow shareholder Scott Weiselberg said. Those typically include Purdue Pharma, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Endo Health Solutions Inc.
The county will also likely go after opioid distributors McKesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen, Weiselberg said.
The county attorney's office met with 12 proposed legal teams before whittling the list to three. The office ranked the shortlist, giving the top spot to the team that was ultimately accepted by the commission.
Along with MDL experience and a local presence, the office considered each team's history of working together, Senior Assistant County Attorney Angela Benjamin said.
“They were all stellar,” Benjamin said. “If you look at the reputations and resumes of any of the members of the teams that were or were not selected, they were all very impressive and highly qualified. So I think with any team, the county is poised to have excellent representation on this matter.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250