Broward County Selects Legal Team to Spearhead Opioid Litigation
The winning team of five law firms combines nationally known plaintiffs lawyers and deep ties to Fort Lauderdale.
January 23, 2018 at 05:27 PM
3 minute read
The Broward County Commission approved a team of five law firms to pursue litigation against pharmaceutical companies over their alleged role in the opioid crisis.
The team of outside counsel chosen Tuesday is composed of Haliczer Pettis & Schwamm, Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Morgan & Morgan and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd. The attorneys will represent the county and the city of Fort Lauderdale.
“We're honored to have been selected by Broward County to represent it in this historic undertaking and look forward to playing a part with it in hopefully crafting a solution to what is an epidemic that has had disastrous impact on all of our communities,” said Kopelowitz Ostrow shareholder Bobby Gilbert of Coral Gables.
The group emphasized its local ties, its diversity and the fact that three of its lawyers serve as plaintiffs leadership for the opioid multidistrict litigation consolidated in Ohio. The three are Elizabeth Cabraser of Lieff Cabraser in San Francisco, Paul Geller of Robbins Geller in Boca Raton, and James Young of Morgan & Morgan in Jacksonville.
Lieff Cabraser and Robbins Geller were initially on a competing team, but the groups merged to have a better shot, Gilbert said. Lieff Cabraser does not have a Florida office, while Robbins Geller is a national firm with a Boca Raton location. The other three firms all have Fort Lauderdale offices.
“What we brought to the table were extensive local contacts, deep roots in Broward County, deep connections to county agencies and to the people of Florida in general,” Gilbert said. “What our new partners in the team brought were national prominence at the highest caliber.”
Both of the other teams who fought for the commission's vote also included MDL plaintiffs' leadership. Motley Rice, Gelber Schachter & Greenberg, and Colson Hicks Eidson made up one team and Simmons Hanly Conroy, Crueger Dickinson, and von Briesen & Roper was the other.
The contract will include a contingency arrangement that caps attorney fees at 25 percent of the net recovery, according to the county. The team will also advance the expenses of the litigation, which will be repaid only out of any financial recovery, among other contract terms.
Broward County will decide where to file the litigation, but it will likely be filed in federal court and become part of the MDL, Gilbert said.
The county intends to sue the same pharmaceutical companies defending opioid litigation around the country, Kopelowitz Ostrow shareholder Scott Weiselberg said. Those typically include Purdue Pharma, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Endo Health Solutions Inc.
The county will also likely go after opioid distributors McKesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen, Weiselberg said.
The county attorney's office met with 12 proposed legal teams before whittling the list to three. The office ranked the shortlist, giving the top spot to the team that was ultimately accepted by the commission.
Along with MDL experience and a local presence, the office considered each team's history of working together, Senior Assistant County Attorney Angela Benjamin said.
“They were all stellar,” Benjamin said. “If you look at the reputations and resumes of any of the members of the teams that were or were not selected, they were all very impressive and highly qualified. So I think with any team, the county is poised to have excellent representation on this matter.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readCrypto Entrepreneur Claims Justice Department’s Software Crackdown Violates US Constitution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 2Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 3Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 4Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
- 5Gift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250