Litigation Department of the Year Nominations Sought for Midsize Firms
Nominations are being sought for the DBR's annual Litigation Department of the Year Awards.
January 25, 2018 at 11:03 AM
6 minute read
2018 Daily Business Review
Litigation Departments of the Year — Midsize Firms
Open to Law Firms With 70-200 Attorneys
Deadline: March 1
We invite you to participate in the Daily Business Review's new Litigation Departments of the Year Midsize Firms awards. The contest has two categories – the top department in general litigation and the top specialty practice groups. The competition is open to all law firms with a Florida presence of 70 to 200 attorneys. (Larger firms are eligible for national awards, and we will post those guidelines separately on law.com.) We are trying to identify and reward powerhouse practices in our area, and we understand many lawyers and law firms have regional or national practices. We would like you to submit matters led by Florida attorneys, but their cases need not have been filed or tried in the state. We plan to name winners in each category but, depending on the quality of the entries, multiple winners may be named in one group and none in another. Please compose separate submissions for the general and specialty contests and submit all materials via email to [email protected]. For each entry, we are asking you to submit one Word or PDF document with the following:
- A list of cases with brief descriptions of their significance
- An essay of up to 500 words explaining why your firm should win
Basic information
1. GENERAL LITIGATION
Describe 4 or 5 litigation results that demonstrate your department's excellence. This list should include results obtained pretrial, at trial or on appeal. It may include pro bono cases. Please rank them in order of importance. By importance, we mean both significance of the result for your client and contributions made by your lawyers. The results must have occurred between Jan. 1, 2017, and Dec. 31, 2017. Please describe each case in no more than 500 words. Each result must have been achieved by lawyers while they were members of your firm based in Florida. Do not include results achieved by lateral hires when they were working for a different firm. For each result, please include the names of clients, lead partners and opposing counsel, as well as contact information for all involved. Descriptions of results should include specific dollar amounts where relevant but should focus on why the result demonstrates the excellence of your department. Unless otherwise marked, all information submitted will be considered on-the-record. Note: If your client was represented by more than one firm, please specify your firm's role. In your submission, please name someone at your firm whom we may contact with questions.
Please submit additional information on:
- The size of your firm's litigation department in Florida and firmwide as of Dec. 31, 2017. (Please specify number of partners, associates and other).
- The percentage of your entire firm represented by the litigation department in terms of lawyers and in terms of percentage of overall firm revenue.
- Three client references, including phone numbers or email addresses.
- Describe your firm's biggest litigation loss in the past two years, with names of opposing counsel.
- Give a brief description of three upcoming matters for your firm.
- Write an essay explaining why your firm should be a finalist. Essay should be no longer than 500 words. Tell us why you should win. Factors we're looking for are importance and difficulty of the matters handled; the quality of opposing counsel; ingenuity and diligence. This is no place for false modesty!
2. SPECIALTY PRACTICE AREAS
The specialty contest will award departments focused on:
- A. Intellectual Property
- B. Products Liability/Mass Torts
- C. Labor and Employment
- D. Insurance
- E. Real Estate/HOA or Other.
You are welcome to compete in more than one specialty category, but separate submissions will be expected for each. Describe 3 or 4 litigation results that demonstrate your department's excellence in this specialty. This list should include both trial and appellate work. The results must have occurred between Jan. 1, 2017, and Dec. 31, 2017. Keep descriptions of each individual case under 500 words. Each result must have been achieved by lawyers while they were members of your firm based in a Florida office. Do not include results achieved by lateral hires when they were working for a different firm. For each result, please include the names of clients, lead partners and opposing counsel, as well as contact information for all involved whenever possible. Descriptions of results should include specific dollar amounts where relevant, but should focus on why the result demonstrates the excellence of your department. Unless otherwise marked, all information submitted will be considered on the record. Note: If your client was represented by more than one firm, please specify your firm's role. In your submission, please name someone at your firm whom we may contact with questions.
Please submit additional information on:
- The size of your firm's litigation department in Florida and firmwide as of Dec. 31, 2017. (Please specify number of partners, associates and other).
- The percentage of your entire firm represented by the litigation department in terms of lawyers and in terms of percentage of overall firm revenue.
- Three client references, including phone numbers or email addresses.
- Describe your firm's biggest litigation loss in the past two years, with names of opposing counsel.
- Give a brief description of three upcoming matters for your firm.
- Write an essay explaining why your firm should be a finalist in this specialty area. Essay should be no longer than 500 words. Tell us why you should win. Factors we're looking for are importance and difficulty of the matters handled; the quality of opposing counsel; ingenuity and diligence. This is no place for false modesty!
Basic Firm Information
Please submit the following sections for your firm. Please complete separate answers for General Litigation and for each Specialty Category submission. Numbers should be for 2017.
- Firm headquarters location
- Firm location office represented in this submission
- Number of litigation partners firmwide
- Number of litigation partners in this office
- Litigation associates firmwide
- Litigation associates in this office
Contact DBR Managing Editor Catherine Wilson with any questions at [email protected].
Please send nomination forms by email by March 1 to [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCuban American Bar Association's Gala Takes on Year 50 With This New President
3 minute readFederal Judges, Litigators and Ray Allen Will Headline Miami Law's Class Action Forum
4 minute readGreenberg Traurig Fosters Mentorship for Girls at 2023 Women's Business Forum
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 2Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
- 3'Big Law Had Become Too Woke': Why Bill Barr Moved On
- 4Manhattan U.S. Attorney Damian Williams Announces Resignation from Office
- 5Governor Hochul Vetoes Bill Meant to Alleviate Public Notaries' Paperwork in Non-Electronic Acts
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250