Nominations Sought for Litigation Departments of the Year — Small Firms
Nominations are sought for the DBR's annual recognition of Litigation Departments of the Year — Small Firms.
January 25, 2018 at 11:04 AM
6 minute read
2018 Daily Business Review Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year — Small Firms
Open to Law Firms With up to 69 Attorneys
Deadline: March 1
We invite you to participate in the Daily Business Review's new Litigation Departments of the Year — Small Firms awards. The contest has two categories — the top department in general litigation and the top specialty practice groups. The competition is open to law firms with a Florida presence of up to 69 attorneys. We are trying to identify and reward powerhouse practices in our area, and we understand many lawyers and law firms have regional or national practices. We would like you to submit matters led by Florida attorneys, but their cases need not have been filed or tried in the state. We plan to name winners in each category but, depending on the quality of the entries, multiple winners may be named in one group and none in another. Please compose separate submissions for the general and specialty contests and submit all materials via email to [email protected].
For each entry, we are asking you to submit one Word or PDF document with the following:
- A list of cases with brief descriptions of their significance
- An essay of up to 500 words explaining why your firm should win
Basic information
1. GENERAL LITIGATION
Describe 4 or 5 litigation results that demonstrate your department's excellence. This list should include results obtained pretrial, at trial or on appeal. It may include pro bono cases. Please rank them in order of importance. By importance, we mean both significance of the result for your client and contributions made by your lawyers. The results must have occurred between Jan. 1, 2017, and Dec. 31, 2017. Please describe each case in no more than 500 words. Each result must have been achieved by lawyers while they were members of your firm based in Florida. Do not include results achieved by lateral hires when they were working for a different firm. For each result, please include the names of clients, lead partners and opposing counsel, as well as contact information for all involved. Descriptions of results should include specific dollar amounts where relevant but should focus on why the result demonstrates the excellence of your department. Unless otherwise marked, all information submitted will be considered on the record. Note: If your client was represented by more than one firm, please specify your firm's role. In your submission, please name someone at your firm whom we may contact with questions.
Please submit additional information on:
- The size of your firm's litigation department in Florida and firmwide as of Dec. 31, 2017. (Please specify number of partners, associates and other).
- The percentage of your entire firm represented by the litigation department in terms of lawyers and in terms of percentage of overall firm revenue.
- Three client references, including phone numbers or email addresses.
- Describe your firm's biggest litigation loss in the past two years, with names of opposing counsel.
- Give a brief description of three upcoming matters for your firm.
- Write an essay explaining why your firm should be a finalist. Essay should be no longer than 500 words. Tell us why you should win. Factors we're looking for are importance and difficulty of the matters handled; the quality of opposing counsel; ingenuity and diligence. This is no place for false modesty!
2. SPECIALTY PRACTICE AREAS
The specialty contest will award departments focused on:
- Intellectual Property
- Products Liability/Mass Torts
- Labor and Employment
- Insurance
- Real Estate/HOA or OTHER.
You are welcome to compete in more than one specialty category, but separate submissions will be expected for each. Describe 3 or 4 litigation results that demonstrate your department's excellence in this specialty. This list should include both trial and appellate work. The results must have occurred between Jan. 1, 2017, and Dec. 31, 2017. Keep descriptions of each individual case under 500 words. Each result must have been achieved by lawyers while they were members of your firm based in a Florida office. Do not include results achieved by lateral hires when they were working for a different firm. For each result, please include the names of clients, lead partners and opposing counsel, as well as contact information for all involved whenever possible. Descriptions of results should include specific dollar amounts where relevant, but should focus on why the result demonstrates the excellence of your department. Unless otherwise marked, all information submitted will be considered on the record. Note: If your client was represented by more than one firm, please specify your firm's role. In your submission, please name someone at your firm whom we may contact with questions. Please submit additional information on:
- The size of your firm's litigation department in Florida and firmwide as of Dec. 31, 2017. (Please specify number of partners, associates and other).
- The percentage of your entire firm represented by the litigation department in terms of lawyers and in terms of percentage of overall firm revenue.
- Three client references, including phone numbers or e-mail addresses.
- Describe your firm's biggest litigation loss in the past two years, with names of opposing counsel.
- Give a brief description of three upcoming matters for your firm.
- Write an essay explaining why your firm should be a finalist in this specialty area. Essay should be no longer than 500 words. Tell us why you should win. Factors we're looking for are importance and difficulty of the matters handled; the quality of opposing counsel; ingenuity and diligence. This is no place for false modesty! Basic Firm Information Please submit the following sections for your firm.
Please complete separate answers for General Litigation and for each Specialty Category submission. Numbers should be for 2017.
Please include:
- Firm headquarters location
- Firm location office represented in this submission
- Number of litigation partners firmwide
- Number of litigation partners in this office
- Litigation associates firmwide
- Litigation associates in this office
Contact DBR Managing Editor Catherine Wilson at [email protected] with any questions.
Please send nominations by email to [email protected] by March 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Lawyer Turned Emmy-Winning Comedian is Headlining at the Broward Center for the Performing Arts
4 minute readCuban American Bar Association's Gala Takes on Year 50 With This New President
3 minute readFederal Judges, Litigators and Ray Allen Will Headline Miami Law's Class Action Forum
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250