'Uber for Attorneys' or the Wild West? Florida Senate Hearing Highlights Divide Over Traffic Ticket Startup
Coral Gables-based traffic ticket startup Tikd lobbied for a quickly withdrawn amendment to Florida's law regulating attorneys.
January 25, 2018 at 04:45 PM
5 minute read
The Ticket Clinic founder Mark Gold is pleased as punch after two new developments in his law firm's showdown with Coral Gables-based ticket-fighting startup Tikd.
First, a Florida state senator on Wednesday withdrew an amendment that would have made Tikd and other “traffic infraction networks” exempt from penalties for the unlicensed practice of law. The withdrawal came minutes after Gold told senators the bill put “the practice of law itself” at stake.
Former Florida Bar President Ramon Abadin withdrew his appearance for Tikd the same day in an $11 million antitrust lawsuit against the bar and the Ticket Clinic for allegedly trying to drive the startup out of business. Last month, the bar moved to disqualify Abadin, claiming his 2015-16 presidency gave him access to confidential information relevant to the litigation.
But the tiff between the 30-year-old, 300-employee Ticket Clinic and its new tech-driven rival Tikd is far from over. And the dispute raises questions that weigh heavily on the minds of legal practitioners around the country as tech companies invade the legal space.
Tikd was founded about a year ago by a nonlawyer, Chris Riley. He had the idea to play a game of averages: A motorist can upload a minor traffic ticket, pay a fee lower than the fine on the citation, and Tikd will contract a lawyer to fight the ticket. If the lawyer loses, Tikd promises to refund the client's money. But most of the time, Tikd figures the lawyer will win.
The company spent its early days under a bar investigation, and last month the Florida Bar board of governors voted to pursue litigation against Tikd for violating rules on the unlicensed practice of law.
In the meantime, Tikd hired lobbying firm Ballard Partners to look into changing the state law regulating attorneys. State Sen. Jeff Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, filed his proposal before the Senate regulated industries committee Wednesday.
Testimony at the hearing outlined the divide on the issue: Should Florida deregulate companies like Tikd to give consumers more choice, or would that open the door to a stream of techies accountable to no one?
Ballard Partners lobbyist Mathew Forrest told senators the proposed amendment would not affect bar rules. Instead, it would open up the marketplace for ticket-dismissal platforms like those popping up around the country — GetDismissed, LegalTap and WinIt.
“I think of it as Uber for attorneys,” Forrest said. “This basically provides a platform for a consumer to get an attorney. All the usual rules that an attorney has are still in place. … This is great for the consumer because they have the convenience now to get an attorney, and it's also great for the attorney.”
Florida Bar lawyer Warren Husband of Metz, Husband & Daughton in Tallahassee attended the hearing and told senators the bar had no position on the bill.
Gold had a clear position. “This bill is clearly the unauthorized practice of law by nonlawyers, unregulated, and it's going to be the Wild West if it's allowed,” he testified.
He said the amendment was a slippery slope that could allow his nonlawyer neighbor to open shop doing real estate closings for $1,000 and hire an attorney at $250 to do the work with no oversight to prevent him from absconding with customers' money.
“Who's stopping them?” Gold asked of Tikd. “They can say anything they want, they can do anything they want, they can close up shop whenever they want, and there's no one there to stop them.”
Brandes withdrew his measure immediately after Gold's remarks.
“Look, these ideas sometimes take years to germinate,” Brandes told colleagues. “Uber took us four years to get through this process. I'm going to save us all a little bit of problems and withdraw this amendment at this time.”
Tikd declined to comment on its next steps.
Gold called the withdrawal a “big win” for The Ticket Clinic, along with Abadin's decision to bow out of the federal antitrust litigation.
Robert Kuntz of Devine Goodman Rasco & Watts-FitzGerald in Coral Gables will step in as local counsel. Co-counsel Peter Kennedy and David King of Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody in Austin, Texas, are handling a number of antitrust cases against state bars.
“Given the arguments at the hearing regarding the motion to disqualify Abadin and the pending motion for sanctions filed by my counsel, Chris Kleppin, I believe he had no choice but to withdraw or face much more dire consequences,” Gold said.
The bar declined to comment.
Abadin, a Coral Gables solo practitioner who made technology's impact on the practice of law a focus of his bar presidency, referred a request for comment to Tikd, which offered no response Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250