Letter to the Editor: Florida Bar Rule Change Encourages More Pro Bono Service
Florida Bar President Michael Higer announces a rule change that expands options for pro bono service by older lawyers.
January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM
3 minute read
A new Florida Bar rule change designed to encourage more pro bono service by retired lawyers has been approved by the Florida Supreme Court and will be implemented Feb. 1.
Already, members of the Florida Bar donate more than 1.6 million hours of free legal assistance every year. Still, that is not nearly enough to provide the help that countless Floridians so desperately need.
The Florida Bar, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Commission on Access to Civil Justice and the Florida Bar Foundation have worked tirelessly to address this issue, and together, our hope is to make the delivery of pro bono service easier to access and to deliver.
It is important to note that the amended rule's use of the word “lawyer” rather than “attorney” is not a substantive change that will affect any lawyer or attorney currently certified to serve in an emeritus status. This is simply one of many similar and routine changes made when any rule is modified for consistency and to conform to Florida Supreme Court style.
Those now certified as an emeritus attorney can continue to provide their valuable service — as I pray they will — without having to be recertified as an emeritus lawyer.
The requirement that a lawyer seeking emeritus status must have engaged in the active practice of law for at least 10 out of the 15 years immediately preceding an application is unchanged from the previous rule and will not disqualify anyone who qualified under the current rule.
Here is what the rule change will do.
It will greatly expand the pool of those eligible to serve as emeritus lawyers providing pro bono legal services to the community including participating in legal clinics sponsored or provided by the lawyers' legal aid organization and providing advice and assistance with legal problems or issues not in litigation including drafting legal documents.
The amended rule will also permit inactive or retired bar members, inactive or retired lawyers who practiced in any other state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, former judges, current or former law professors, and authorized house counsel to serve as emeritus lawyers and perform this important service.
Currently, there are fewer than two dozen emeritus lawyers in Florida; this amendment could add more than 6,000 to that number. This is great news.
This amendment has been praised by Florida Bar Foundation President Jewel White. It was recommended by the Florida Commission on Access to Civil Justice. It was examined and approved by the Florida Bar's board of governors and the state Supreme Court, with many opportunities for public comment along the way.
This change, which has been in the works for several years, will welcome many more lawyers to do what so many members of The Florida Bar have done so well for so long — provide pro bono legal services to our neighbors in need.
Michael J. Higer
President
The Florida Bar
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLetter to the Editor: Harvey Ruvin Was a Legendary Public Servant
Letter to the Editor: Florida's Judicial Benches Dominated by Former Prosecutors
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250