Broward Judge Claudia Robinson Quits During Ethics Probe
The judge faced a 30-day suspension without pay.
February 01, 2018 at 05:28 PM
4 minute read
Broward County Court Administrative Judge Robert W. Lee will work with Judges Christopher W. Pole and Daniel J. Kanner to take over the judicial duties of departing Judge Claudia Robinson, who resigned during an ethics investigation.
The other judges will step in to assure full coverage in Robinson's courtroom at the South Regional Courthouse in Hollywood, according to a notice from Broward Chief Circuit Judge Jack Tuter. They will handle Robinson's caseload once their colleague steps down Feb. 12.
Robinson resigned Thursday while facing possible suspension.
“Due to personal reasons, please accept this letter as formal notice of my retirement from office as county court judge for the 17th Judicial Circuit,” she wrote in a Feb. 1 letter to Gov. Rick Scott.
“It has been an honor, privilege and pleasure to serve the wonderful people of Broward,” Robin wrote. “I would like to take this opportunity to express my heartfelt appreciation to the many talented and honorable judges, attorneys, judicial assistants, bailiffs, deputies, clerks, court administrators and court personnel who assisted me since I took office, and who work tirelessly in the administration of our system of justice.”
The judge, who named her former campaign manager the default mediator in 245 cases after she reached the bench, admitted violating rules governing judicial ethics. She faced a 30-day suspension without pay based on the state Judicial Qualifications Commission's findings and recommendation of discipline filed in November.
Robinson acknowledged she violated judicial canons by “creating the appearance of impropriety and favoritism” in her dealings with Wilton Manors attorney and political consultant Michael Ahearn. Court records show she helped Ahearn grow a lucrative business with hundreds of cases billed at $250 and $300 per hour.
The judge self-funded most of her 2014 campaign for judicial office and did not hire a campaign manager. But she relied on Ahearn, who “played a significant role” as a volunteer consultant, according to a stipulation filed in the disciplinary proceedings.
The JQC ethics charges against her suggested she seemed to repay the favor once from the bench, assigning a “disproportionate number of mediations” to her political ally.
“By appointing Mr. Ahearn as the default mediator in over 80 percent of her mediation orders, Judge Robinson created the appearance that the appointments were, in effect, payback for Mr. Ahearn's services to Judge Robinson's campaign,” according to the stipulation.
Robinson denied the allegation but acknowledged her conduct created the appearance of favoritism. She insisted she had no deal with Ahearn to use her position to benefit his business and said she instead based the appointments on the quality of his work.
“Judge Robinson deeply regrets her error in judgment, and has expressed sincere remorse about the damage her conduct caused to the public's perception of the independence of the judiciary,” the stipulation states.
The judge broadened the pool of mediators after a journalist broke the story, and Ahearn denied any wrongdoing.
“The Florida Bar investigated these allegations against me and dismissed the bar complaint because they found no inappropriate relationship between me and the judge,” Ahearn said. “The parties to the litigation always had the option to use someone other than me. They weren't forced to use me.”
Robinson was represented in the ethics case by Fort Lauderdale Mayor John Seiler, of Seiler, Sautter, Zaden, Rimes & Wahlbrink, who said his schedule prevented him from commenting before press time Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250