Broward Judge Claudia Robinson Quits During Ethics Probe
The judge faced a 30-day suspension without pay.
February 01, 2018 at 05:28 PM
4 minute read
Broward County Court Administrative Judge Robert W. Lee will work with Judges Christopher W. Pole and Daniel J. Kanner to take over the judicial duties of departing Judge Claudia Robinson, who resigned during an ethics investigation.
The other judges will step in to assure full coverage in Robinson's courtroom at the South Regional Courthouse in Hollywood, according to a notice from Broward Chief Circuit Judge Jack Tuter. They will handle Robinson's caseload once their colleague steps down Feb. 12.
Robinson resigned Thursday while facing possible suspension.
“Due to personal reasons, please accept this letter as formal notice of my retirement from office as county court judge for the 17th Judicial Circuit,” she wrote in a Feb. 1 letter to Gov. Rick Scott.
“It has been an honor, privilege and pleasure to serve the wonderful people of Broward,” Robin wrote. “I would like to take this opportunity to express my heartfelt appreciation to the many talented and honorable judges, attorneys, judicial assistants, bailiffs, deputies, clerks, court administrators and court personnel who assisted me since I took office, and who work tirelessly in the administration of our system of justice.”
The judge, who named her former campaign manager the default mediator in 245 cases after she reached the bench, admitted violating rules governing judicial ethics. She faced a 30-day suspension without pay based on the state Judicial Qualifications Commission's findings and recommendation of discipline filed in November.
Robinson acknowledged she violated judicial canons by “creating the appearance of impropriety and favoritism” in her dealings with Wilton Manors attorney and political consultant Michael Ahearn. Court records show she helped Ahearn grow a lucrative business with hundreds of cases billed at $250 and $300 per hour.
The judge self-funded most of her 2014 campaign for judicial office and did not hire a campaign manager. But she relied on Ahearn, who “played a significant role” as a volunteer consultant, according to a stipulation filed in the disciplinary proceedings.
The JQC ethics charges against her suggested she seemed to repay the favor once from the bench, assigning a “disproportionate number of mediations” to her political ally.
“By appointing Mr. Ahearn as the default mediator in over 80 percent of her mediation orders, Judge Robinson created the appearance that the appointments were, in effect, payback for Mr. Ahearn's services to Judge Robinson's campaign,” according to the stipulation.
Robinson denied the allegation but acknowledged her conduct created the appearance of favoritism. She insisted she had no deal with Ahearn to use her position to benefit his business and said she instead based the appointments on the quality of his work.
“Judge Robinson deeply regrets her error in judgment, and has expressed sincere remorse about the damage her conduct caused to the public's perception of the independence of the judiciary,” the stipulation states.
The judge broadened the pool of mediators after a journalist broke the story, and Ahearn denied any wrongdoing.
“The Florida Bar investigated these allegations against me and dismissed the bar complaint because they found no inappropriate relationship between me and the judge,” Ahearn said. “The parties to the litigation always had the option to use someone other than me. They weren't forced to use me.”
Robinson was represented in the ethics case by Fort Lauderdale Mayor John Seiler, of Seiler, Sautter, Zaden, Rimes & Wahlbrink, who said his schedule prevented him from commenting before press time Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
4 minute readExecutive Assistant, Alleging Pregnancy Discrimination and Retaliation, Sues Florida Healthcare Entrepreneur
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 2Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 3Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 4Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 5Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250