Greenspoon Marder Revenues Rise on Deals, Disputes, Pot Policy Moves
Greenspoon Marder's growth was tempered somewhat in 2017, but the firm still increased revenue by double digits.
February 07, 2018 at 01:59 PM
4 minute read
Greenspoon Marder posted double-digit revenue growth yet again in 2017—though the dollars piled up at a slightly more modest clip than in recent years. Gross revenue increased by 10 percent in 2017 to $134.7 million, after rising about 12 percent in 2015 and more than 17 percent in 2016.
Growth in profits per partner also lagged somewhat in comparison with 2016, when PPP was up 10 percent over the prior year. The firm nevertheless saw PPP gains of 5.2 percent last year, with a somewhat smaller pool of equity partners taking home $628,000 on average.
The 203-lawyer firm's net income stayed almost flat at $55.25 million. But revenue per lawyer, which had dipped in 2016, rose in 2017 by 6.8 percent to $633,000.
Co-managing director Gerald Greenspoon attributed the continuing growth in part to the firm's traditional real estate practices and its rising status as a top-ranked adviser to the cannabis industry. But he also cited its robust corporate division—particularly in M&A—and its recently developed IP and long-time commercial litigation practices, which, this year, handled cases for high-profile corporate clients including Landry's Seafood House-Florida and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia.
“We are pretty much running on all cylinders now. We have quite a number of positive situations,” Greenspoon said.
Greenspoon Marder added five new offices in 2017, for a total of 24 nationwide, and it hired nine partners. Already this year it has continued to add add offices and partners, including most recently Stephan Mallenbaum, who was named an executive partner after joining from Dentons in January.
Onboarding laterals and opening up offices in new cities smoothly and quickly has become a point of pride with the firm, Greenspoon said.
“As a result of years of planning ahead, and building a very large, very sophisticated infrastructure, when we do an expansion into a city the additional cost is minimal. It's incremental,” Greenspoon said. “We bring on the new employees with barely an increase in overall staff that increases the associated costs.”
That seamlessness helps when Greenspoon Marder competes to attract lawyers whom other prowling firms may want to poach as well, he said.
“When we are negotiating with a group, we can tell them we can make it happen quickly and very painlessly,” he said.
The firm's total head count grew 3 percent in 2017, up from 197 to 203 lawyers, but it also shed some equity partners, dropping to 88 from 93 the previous year.
Greenspoon described the contraction in the partnership as “sort of a clean up.”
He said: “We had a number of partners who went into retirement mode. They no longer wanted to be full time.”
In 2018, he said he expects more lawyers to joining, increasing the firm's headcount as much as 10 percent. Greenspoon said he wasn't worried about the impact of new signals from the Department of Justice on marijuana law enforcement, which many law firms with cannabis practices expect to prompt some turmoil.
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memo this year rescinding prior guidance issued by the prior administration on enforcing federal pot prohibitions. The 2013 guidance, known as the Cole memo, had discouraged federal law enforcement officials from bringing marijuana-related charges in states that have legalized the drug.
“It creates additional opportunity for a firm like ours. It will for a short time create uncertainty, and our clients will reach out to us to ask how to handle that,” Greenspoon said of the policy shift. The firm's lawyers historically have advised “many regulated industries,” including the alcohol and student-lending sectors, Greenspoon said.
“We are quite adept at handling changes in regulations. It's what lawyers are needed for,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readLaw Firms' 'Failed Hires' Expected to Climb as Lateral Hiring Ramps Up
6 minute readHighest-Earning Partners May Be Looking to Cash In on Early Retirement
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250