Holland & Knight Helps Miami's Ladenburg Thalmann Raise $73.5 Million
The two attorneys who closed the deal worked on an unusual bond issuance called baby bonds.
February 13, 2018 at 11:32 AM
4 minute read
Two Holland & Knight attorneys in Miami helped a financial services company raise $73.5 million on the sale of bonds for general corporate purposes.
Partner Bradley Houser and senior associate Shane Segarra represented Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc. in issuing the bonds. The deal closed Dec. 12.
Ladenburg Thalmann is a Miami-based, publicly traded financial services company listed on the New York Stock Exchange and led by president and CEO Richard J. Lampen, a former law partner at the defunct Steel Hector & Davis. The company offers wealth and asset management; insurance, trust and estate planning; and investment banking, fixed-income trading and equity research.
The bond revenue is for general corporate purposes, but the company hasn't released the details, according to Houser.
For the issuance, Ladenburg Thalmann opted for less typical bonds, which at $25 per bond costs much less than a traditional bond — and are aptly named baby bonds. A total of 2.9 million notes were issued,
“The baby bond is a unique security. It's not as frequently issued by public companies as typical traditional bonds, which have a par value of say $1,000,” Segarra said. “When it's a registered baby bond issued to the public, a lot of times you would see it traded almost like a common stock. In this case, it was traded on the NYSE.”
“In essence, it looks and trades a lot on the exchange like an equity security with the liquidity on the market on the stock exchange. Yet it pays interest. In the case of a liquidation of the company … it has preference in liquidation over all equity and security in the company,” Houser said. “It trades on the exchange in much the same manner as an equity security” like common stock or preferred stock.
The baby bonds made this issuance more accessible to more investors, he added.
“It gives smaller investors a little bit more access to be able to buy and invest in these types of bonds because it's more accessible with the price point and the liquidity of the bond as well,” Segarra said.
That means the issuance drew a diverse pool of investors.
“It's a wide variety of investors, including some retail investors, some institutional investors, larger firms,” Segarra said.
As for why Ladenburg Thalmann chose to issue baby bonds, Houser said, ”It was to offer a debt security that would, due to its lower par value, be more readily tradeable on the NYSE.”
Like many deals, this one wasn't without its obstacles for the attorneys.
Houser and Segarra worked through the challenge of closing deal quickly enough to lock in a better interest rate for their client.
“In the last few months, we have been in an environment of increasing interest rates,” Houser said.
This was against a backdrop of expectations for the Federal Reserve to increase interest rates again this year, Segarra noted.
That added pressure on the attorneys, Houser added.
“There was a time pressure to get the deal priced and get the coupon interest rate set,” he said.
They locked in a 6.5 percent interest rate annually for their client, Houser said. This rate applies as long as the bonds due in 2027 are outstanding.
“It was a fairly smooth deal, well-received by everybody. Just like Brad said with the time pressure, that was the main challenge,” Segarra said. “But other than that, it seemed to be a pretty successful transaction.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholders Sue Arc Global for Wrongful Withholding of Trump Media Shares
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
'A Good Day': Florida Bank Linked to Venezuela Is Hit With $800,000 Verdict
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
- 2New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 3Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
- 4'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
- 5Productivity Suite Startup Macro Announces $12 Million Funding Round
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250