Miami Apartment Crane Supplier Sued Over Collapse in Hurricane Irma
A subcontractor on a downtown construction site says the crane supplier provided a defective crane and declined to remove it after it was damaged by the storm.
February 13, 2018 at 03:27 PM
4 minute read
A company that supplied the crane that collapsed at a downtown Miami construction site during Hurricane Irma is accused in a lawsuit of providing a defective crane.
X Miami, a 31-story, 464-unit apartment tower, is still under construction on the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Second Avenue near the Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus.
The tower was previously called Vice, and the Vice name was still on the construction entrance Tuesday, but the building is being rebranded as part of developer Property Markets Group's X Social Communities portfolio, a media representative said.
L&R Structural Corp. Inc. is a Miami-based subcontractor hired to build the apartments. The company rented a crane Aug. 9, 2016, from Maxim Crane Works LP for $23,000 a month for the project, according to the complaint and lease agreement.
L&R contends Maxim provided a crane that was “in an unreasonably dangerous condition” as it collapsed during the hurricane Sept. 10 even though wind speeds were far less than what the crane should have been able to withstand, according to the Feb. 2 complaint.
Under the lease, L&R said it was Maxim's responsibility to disassemble and remove the damaged crane after the storm, but Maxim refused, according to the complaint. Maxim sent an engineer to oversee L&R's removal of the crane, which L&R did at its own cost.
Maxim also failed to repair or replace the crane in a “commercially reasonable time,” the lawsuit said.
Maxim didn't return an emailed request for comment. A company representative declined comment by phone.
In a letter to L&R on Sept. 19, Maxim said the lease left L&R responsible for costs resulting from the accident.
“You are responsible to pay for all costs and expenses arising from or resulting from the accident, which would include … the cost of the repairs of the equipment, all retrieval costs and continued rent,” Maxim said in the letter signed by Ryan Gutwald, Maxim vice president of risk management. “The machine will remain on rent until it has been repaired, inspected and returned into our rental fleet.”
The Miami-Dade Circuit Court complaint listed breach of express warranty, breach of lease and strict products liability counts.
The lawsuit also claimed information was negligently supplied for the guidance of others. This stems from allegations that the hurricane preparedness plan supplied by Maxim, which L&R relied upon to prepare the construction site for the storm, was false and deficient, according to the complaint.
“Maxim failed to exercise reasonable care or competence to ensure the truth and accuracy of the information it supplied,” according to the complaint.
The lawsuit was filed by Holland & Knight attorneys Michael Candes, James McCrae and Andrew Albaugh in Orlando.
The crane was one of three that collapsed in South Florida during the hurricane.
Tower cranes, of which there were an estimated 25 in downtown Miami during the hurricane, aren't disassembled or locked during a hurricane, but instead are left to move with the wind to offer less resistance.
The crane atop X Miami collapsed hours after Irma roared up the peninsula, according to the complaint.
Parts of the crane dangled over the Metromover and the Miami Dade College campus, according to the complaint.
The city and the college warned L&R that if the crane wasn't removed by Sept. 18, each would start fining L&R, with the college specifying a $160,000 fine a day, according to the complaint.
But Miami Dade College couldn't confirm this. No one at the college spoke to a subcontractor about this, Juan Mendieta, college media representative, said in an email.
Property Markets Group's X Social Communities, or XSC, apartments are being developed throughout the U.S. to cater to professionals seeking convenience in an urban setting.
Aside from X Miami, other XSC projects in South Florida are X Las Olas in downtown Fort Lauderdale to be finished in winter 2020 and a 690-unit apartment building on a recently purchased 1.15-acre site at 400 Biscayne Blvd.
PMG declined to comment for this story.
X Miami is set for completion this fall.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250