'There'll Be No Sympathy:' Lawyers Discuss Defense Strategies After Mass School Shooting
The focus is on diverting attention from potential defendants in civil cases and pointing to mitigating factors that might aid the defense in the criminal case.
February 15, 2018 at 02:39 PM
7 minute read
Fort Lauderdale criminal defense attorney James Lewis didn't get to bed until 3 o'clock Thursday, and was up two hours later to start the day.
Lewis is one of a handful of Florida lawyers swept into a national horror story in the case of Nikolas Cruz, 19, who is accused of committing one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history. He represents a Broward County family who let Cruz move into their home last Thanksgiving weeks after his adoptive mother, Lynda Cruz, died Nov. 1.
The shooting drew international attention and sparked broad political debate about gun control, premises liability and the death penalty. For Cruz, who faces 17 murder counts, the case will likely become a matter of life or death if prosecutors choose to pursue the death penalty.
“There'll be no sympathy. Nobody expects sympathy. The carnage, the loss are beyond words,” said Broward Public Defender Howard Finkelstein, whose office was waiting to learn whether it would represent the alleged shooter. “What will take place in court will not be about fixing that which can't be fixed — meaning the families' losses — but what is the appropriate and just response of our community, our society, our country.”
Among lawyers who might represent potential defendants in civil suits from the fallout of the Valentine's Day shooting, the focus was on diverting attention from their clients and pointing to mitigating factors that might aid Cruz's defense.
“It's going to come down to experience and the ability to drown out the background noises and simply focus on the job at hand,” said David Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor who practices white-collar criminal defense as a Miami partner at Hinshaw & Culbertson. “With the number of victims … it's clearly on paper a case that qualifies for the death penalty. However, they've got to balance the aggravating against the mitigating factors.”
Aggravating and mitigating factors would come into play if prosecutors seek the death penalty and a jury convicted Cruz. In this case, his youth and reported struggles with mental illness could play in his favor, but his defense would face an uphill fight, Weinstein said.
The picture emerging of Cruz in the hours following the shooting is of an orphaned teenager expelled from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in affluent Parkland for disciplinary reasons. He lived with family friends after his mother's death but was unhappy there and asked to move to a schoolmate's home, news media reported. He faces multiple felony charges on accusations he sounded a fire alarm and used smoke grenades to lure students and staff into hallways before opening fire with an AR-15 semi-automatic weapon.
“It seems like the aggravating [factors] are going to be tremendous,” Weinstein said. “But all the mitigating factors haven't been determined.”
Also undetermined is the potential liability for the Broward County school district and others who might be pulled into court to answer for the massacre.
'ABSOLUTELY FORESEEABLE'
Because school shootings have become so frequent — Parkland was the 18th this year — schools are more likely to be held liable in civil court for student deaths and injuries, said Coral Gables attorney Todd Michaels.
Decades ago, school defense lawyers might have been able to argue a campus shooting was not a foreseeable incident and therefore could not have been prevented by the school. But that's no longer the case, Michaels said.
“It is tragic, but it is absolutely foreseeable that issues like these are going to happen in schools,” said the premises liability attorney with the Haggard Law Firm. “As a result, these schools have an absolute legal duty to react.”
Broward County Public Schools did not return requests for comment by deadline, and its media relations line ran busy for hours.
The issue of school liability came up in 2011 when the Haggard firm obtained a nearly $1.9 million negligent security settlement with the neighboring Miami-Dade School District for the family of a boy who was stabbed to death at Coral Gables High School.
After the Parkland shooting, Michaels said he hopes to see increased school security measures such as metal detectors and ID checks along with better procedures for preventing students with disciplinary issues from escalating their behavior.
Although he believes deep national introspection about gun control and mental health is desperately needed, school officials must also do their part, Michaels said.
“You can ask society to do things,” he said. “You can ask the criminal justice system to do things. But unfortunately, because these issues have become repeated, we also have to count on premises to take the necessary steps to prevent instances like this.”
Unlike hotels, nightclubs and other venues sued after mass shootings, public schools are subject to sovereign immunity, meaning their liability in Florida is capped at $200,000 per person or $300,000 per tort claim. The Florida Legislature must approve any payout above the cap under a special claims bill.
Michaels hopes that won't stop attorneys from representing victims' families.
“If the only thing that's going to get attention and cause actual change is a civil lawsuit, then lawyers have to take these,” he said. “This is an issue that affects every single person in our society.”
CHANGE OF VENUE?
News of the shooting trickled out over a matter of hours before the death toll was announced, creating a new hurdle for attorneys hoping to move the case to a venue away from the South Florida outcry.
”A change of venue is rarely granted to the defense,” Finkelstein said. “Usually these kinds of cases saturate the media for days, weeks or months.”
Miami criminal defense attorney Bruce Lehr agreed.
“Personally, I feel that with all of the national publicity that has been given this horrible event, you'd have to change venue to another planet,” said Lehr, a partner at Lehr Levi & Mendez in Miami. “Although the defense would move for it, I don't know that it would be granted.”
An insanity defense would also prove difficult based on reports about the assault rifle, the bullets Cruz carried and what he wore: a shirt with school insignia.
“The Florida test is, at the time of the crime, being incapable of knowing right from wrong,” Lehr said. “From the media reports that doesn't seem very likely.”
The Public Defender's Office must determine whether it might have any conflicts in a case with 17 fatalities and hundreds of potential witnesses. For instance, the office might have to bow out if he represented any of the witnesses in other actions, Assistant Public Defender Gordon Weekes Jr. said. Lehr predicted the agency would assemble its most experienced team for the high-profile case.
“What do you do?” he asked. “It's usually the most senior people who get these assignments, and with seniority comes a certain thickening of the skin.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
5 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250