Securities Class Action Filed Against Fund Caught in Market Rout
A Boca Raton financial executive claims a $90,000 investment lost about 80 percent of its value in days, whittling to about $18,000 from Feb. 5 to Feb. 7.
February 20, 2018 at 02:17 PM
4 minute read
South Miami securities litigator Michael E. Criden filed a class action lawsuit against a Chicago-based commodities trader whose funds reportedly lost 80 percent of their value in three days.
Criden represents lead plaintiff Leonard Sokolow in the suit pending in Illinois against LJM Funds Management Ltd. and its affiliates. His firm filed the complaint along with Scott + Scott litigator Thomas Laughlin in New York alleging violation of federal securities laws. Their client is the president and CEO of Boca Raton-based financial advisory and brokerage Newbridge Financial Inc., who claimed a $90,000 investment with LJM Funds whittled to about $18,000 from Feb. 5 to 7.
If certified, the class would represent investors who purchased shares of the LJM Preservation and Growth Fund, or LJMIX, from Feb. 28, 2015, to Feb. 7, 2018.
Sokolow invested in options — derivative securities linked to contracts that give investors the choice, or option, to buy or sell underlying assets at a set price by a predetermined date. His lawsuit alleges LJM portfolio managers assured they had hedged the investments to protect against extreme market volatility, but that claim proved unfounded when the leading indicator of U.S. equities, the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, plunged nearly 5 percent Feb. 5.
LJM's website invites potential clients to “harness volatility with liquid alternatives.” Sokolow's lawsuit claims the company promoted the investments as conservative offerings until the market rout exposed a vulnerability as the LJMIX mutual fund share price tumbled to $1.94 on Feb. 7, down from $9.82 days earlier.
“Had they been hedged appropriately, even with severe market correction … they wouldn't have lost so much,” Criden said. “These investments were not represented to be inherently risky. That was the attraction.”
The Morningstar Analyst Rating, which measures funds' risk-adjusted returns, downgraded LJMIX from neutral to negative, citing “steep losses, poor risk controls and inadequate oversight.”
LJM Funds did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and no attorney has entered an appearance on its behalf in the case filed Feb. 9 and pending before U.S. District Judge Robert M. Dow Jr. in Chicago.
But the company's parent, LJM Partners Inc., posted a pop-up on its website requiring users to acknowledge a disclaimer about investment risks before entering.
“The risk of loss in trading commodities can be substantial. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition,” the notice reads. “The high degree of leverage that is often obtainable in commodity trading can work against you as well as for you. The use of leverage can lead to large losses as well as gains. In some cases, managed commodity accounts are subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. It may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.”
Law firm advertisements suggest LJM could face multiple suits.
New York-based Bronstein Gewirtz & Grossman issued a Feb. 12 alert to participants interested in its class action. Meanwhile, an ad on Google from Girard Gibbs invites potential plaintiffs to “talk to a securities lawyer” at the firm's California or New York offices.
“Our attorneys are investigating claims on behalf of investors of LJM Preservation and Growth Fund (LJMIX) for possible violations of federal securities laws,” according to a posting on the firm's website.
“The world realized … the protection that was supposed to be in place in the fund just didn't exist,” Criden said. “It's obvious that they didn't adhere to the investment strategy. Otherwise these losses could never have happened — not to this extent.”
Sokolow's suit names as defendants investment adviser LJM Funds, parent company LJM Partners Inc., chairman Anthony Caine, chief portfolio manager Anish Parvataneni, underwriter and national distributor Northern Lights Distributors LLC, registrant Two Roads Shared Trust, its chairman Mark Gertsen, president Andrew Rogers, treasurer James Colatino and trustees Anita Krug, Neil Kaufman and Mark Garbin. The three-count complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Judge Approves Shaq's $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
3 minute readA Voyeur Videotaped Them Undressing. Should Cruise Ship Passengers Have to Arbitrate?
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readSupreme Court Wrestles With Disabled Ex-Firefighter's Discrimination Case
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250