Miami Lawyer Who Helped Write Hazing Law Sues in FSU Student's Death
Stewart Tilghman Fox Bianchi & Cain attorneys filed the lawsuit on behalf of the parents of Andrew Coffey, who died of alcohol poisoning at an off-campus fraternity party.
February 22, 2018 at 02:34 PM
4 minute read
Veteran trial lawyer David Bianchi participated in drafting Florida legislation to criminalize hazing — strenuous and often humiliating initiation rituals.
As prosecutors use that law to bring charges against fraternity members allegedly linked to the Nov. 3 death of Florida State University fraternity pledge Andrew Coffey, Bianchi is gearing up for a civil lawsuit by Coffey's parents.
“All of this is coming together at the same time,” said Bianchi, who is handling the litigation with Michael Levine, an associate at Stewart Tilghman Fox Bianchi & Cain.
Bianchi said he draws inspiration from a quote, immortalized on a plaque in his Miami office, by retired Leon Circuit Judge Kathleen Dekker.
“I want to save the victims who will quietly go along because they want to belong,” reads the statement attributed to Dekker. “I want schools to be furious and mad and upset that they can lose talent to this, and come down hard on hazing.”
The words helped Bianchi push through on a 41-page complaint naming 15 defendants in a civil lawsuit over Coffey's death. The quotation was part of the judge's comments at the sentencing of Michael Morton and Jason Harris, two fraternity members sentenced to prison under the Chad Meredith Act — Florida's anti-hazing law named for a 18-year-old University of Miami student who drowned on campus in 2001 after a night of heavy drinking.
Bianchi represented Meredith's parents and won a $14 million verdict — the largest at that time in the country for a fraternity hazing death. He'd also helped draft the 2005 Florida law named for Meredith to make hazing a third-degree felony if it results in serious injury or death.
That law resulted in a two-year prison sentence for Morton and Harris and allowed prosecutors to bring criminal charges against nine fraternity members allegedly linked to Coffey's death at an off-campus party.
The plaintiffs in Bianchi's civil litigation are Coffey's parents, Lighthouse Point residents Thomas and Sandra Coffey, suing as personal representatives of their son's estate. They seek compensation for their mental pain and suffering, and medical and funeral costs, among other damages.
The civil suit names all nine defendants in the criminal case: Conner R. Ravelo, Anthony Petagine, Luke E. Kluttz, Kyle J. Bauer, Brett A. Birmingham, Clayton M. Muehlstein, Anthony J. Oppenheimer, Christopher M. Hamlin and John B. Ray. It adds fraternity adviser D. Craig Filar, and Richard Guile and Thomas Rohrlack, who rented the house where Coffey died. It also names Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity Inc., Beta Eta Real Estate Inc. and Beta Eta House Corp. Inc. of Tallahassee Florida as defendants. It does not include FSU because Bianchi said the school was not responsible for the events leading to Coffey's death from acute alcohol poisoning.
On the night he died, Coffey, 20, was participating in the fraternity's annual Big Brother Night, which assigned recruits or pledges to fraternity “big brothers.” Bianchi said the group held the event off campus to avoid university scrutiny, then members served bottles of alcohol to pledges.
“There is tremendous pressure put on these pledges to drink the entire contents of whatever they'r'e given,” Bianchi said, invoking Dekker's comment. ”As a result, Andrew Coffey drank the entire bottle.”
The autopsy report showed Coffey's blood-alcohol level was about seven times the legal limit for driving in Florida.
No attorney had entered an appearance for the defendants in the civil suit, and Pi Kappa Phi spokesman Todd Shelton declined to comment on the pending litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250