Vacation Rental Bill Narrowly Clears State House Panel
HB 773, sponsored by Rep. Mike La Rosa, R-St. Cloud, would negate local vacation-rental ordinances passed since June 1, 2011.
February 23, 2018 at 03:14 PM
4 minute read
A bill that would pre-empt local regulation of vacation rental properties squeaked through a state House committee after lawmakers added provisions related to sexual predators and offenders.
The bill (HB 773) sponsored by Rep. Mike La Rosa, R-St. Cloud, would negate local vacation-rental ordinances passed since June 1, 2011. But it would let cities and counties impose new regulations as long as the rules applied equally to all residential properties, including private homes as well as vacation rentals.
The House Government Accountability Committee voted 13-11 in favor of the bill. After the vote, Chairman Matt Caldwell, R-North Fort Myers, said more testimony and amendments will be considered when the bill is next heard in the Commerce Committee.
La Rosa said vacation rentals are an important part of Florida's tourism industry, and his legislation is aimed at curbing a proliferation of local-government regulations, which he said are hindering rental activity.
“At the end of the day, I believe this is a private property discussion,” La Rosa said. “I believe if someone owns a property they shouldn't be governed out of using that property for whatever specific reasons.”
But local governments have objected to restrictions on their ability to regulate rental properties.
La Rosa supported two amendments that would require notification of law enforcement, nearby residents and hotel guests if sexual offenders or predators rent vacation homes or hotel rooms.
The committee endorsed a provision from Rep. Jay Fant, R-Jacksonville, that would require sexual offenders who stay at vacation rentals to notify local sheriff's offices at least 48 hours before the stay. It also would require vacation rental owners to give 24-hour notice to residents who live within 1,000 feet of the properties that sex offenders will be staying at the rentals.
The committee also approved an amendment from Rep. David Santiago, R-Deltona, that would require notification of all hotel guests if a sexual predator is staying at a property. It would require the hotel to ask guests at check-in if they are sexual predators.
Rep. Cary Pigman, R-Avon Park, questioned how the second provision “would work,” noting it would mean he, his wife and children would have to answer the question as they checked into a hotel at Walt Disney World.
“While I laud your efforts, I get bogged down in how we would execute this without making Florida become the weirdest state in the world to come to and get a hotel room,” Pigman said.
'A LITTLE WEIRD'
Santiago said the provision was being added because opponents of the vacation rental legislation have argued it could lead to sexual predators renting rooms or houses without any notification.
“It's only in response to the opponents and trying to see if we satisfy that concern,” Santiago said.
La Rosa said he “absolutely” supported the measure, and he may further revise the bill to allow rental homes or hotel owners to refuse to accept sexual predators as guests.
“This would make things a little weird, but it would make it safe,” La Rosa said about Santiago's provision.
The meeting became contentious when Rep. Jayer Williamson, R-Pace, made a procedural motion that forced an immediate vote on the bill, cutting off debate on other pending amendments and eliminating any opportunity for the public to testify.
“This is completely unorthodox,” said Rep. Joseph Abruzzo, D-Boynton Beach, adding not allowing public testimony “is absolutely wrong.”
A similar Senate bill (SB 1400), sponsored by Rep. Greg Steube, R-Sarasota, is awaiting a hearing in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Lloyd Dunkelberger writes for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250