R.J. Reynolds Slammed With $42M Verdict With No Fault for Smoker
The tobacco company's lawyers withdrew the comparative fault defense before trial, a move the plaintiffs team had never seen before.
February 26, 2018 at 01:06 PM
5 minute read
South Florida lawyers Alex Alvarez and Gary Paige are no strangers to eight-figure tobacco verdicts.
Before they teamed up to win a $41.8 million verdict on Feb. 8 for a smoker's estate, the duo had already racked up three verdicts over $40 million and several more above $20 million.
But what made Dawn Schlefstein's case unique was that R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. did not try to argue Schlefstein was partially to blame for her chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The company withdrew the comparative fault defense before trial, a move Alvarez and Paige have never seen before.
Schlefstein brought the Broward Circuit Court case in 2008, shortly before her death at age 63. The New York native started smoking when she was 14 and was soon going through a pack a day of Newports or Salems, said Alvarez of the Alvarez Law Firm in Coral Gables.
“She tried cutting down,” he said. “She tried Nicorette gum. She tried hypnosis. Back in the day, there was an ear stimulator that she went to a doctor to try.”
When the nicotine patch came onto the market in the early '90s, Schlefstein finally kicked the habit. But she was diagnosed with severe COPD, also known as emphysema, in 1996.
Schlefstein was on oxygen at all times and was out of breath even lifting her arms, said Paige of Gordon & Doner in Davie. She needed a lung transplant, and steroids and other medications caused her to gain about 30 pounds and suffer kidney failure and diabetes. The drugs also made her dizzy, causing a fall that led to a hip transplant, the attorneys said.
Schlefstein's death was unrelated to the emphysema, so the lawsuit only sought damages for her suffering for the 14 years after she was diagnosed with the disease.
“Of all the cases we've had with live plaintiffs, this one was the worst suffering I've ever seen,” Alvarez said. He declined to disclose the cause of death because it wasn't part of the trial.
Schlefstein's high school sweetheart and husband of 40 years, Leslie, carried on the case after her death. On top of compensatory damages, the plaintiff argued R.J. Reynolds should be held liable for punitive damages for allegedly crafting misleading advertisements that caused Dawn Schlefstein to become addicted to nicotine as a teenager.
R.J. Reynolds argued punitive damages were unreasonable because the company has changed its ways, particularly now that the tobacco industry is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. The company is no longer marketing to children or involved in any conspiracy to mislead the public about the health effects of smoking, argued King & Spalding attorneys W. Ray Persons and Kathryn Lehman of Atlanta and Scott Edson of Washington.
The plaintiffs attorneys argued internal documents showed R.J. Reynolds tried to avoid regulation for decades. An R.J. Reynolds spokesman declined to comment.
After trial before Broward Circuit Judge Mily Rodriguez Powell, the jury awarded $27.8 million in punitive damages, on top of about $14 million in compensatory damages — with, of course, no reduction for comparative fault.
Alvarez and Paige have had recent success in persuading juries that smokers should not be held liable for their tobacco-related illnesses.
In 2016, Alvarez's firm won the first Florida tobacco case that assigned zero fault to the plaintiff. Last October, Paige and co-counsel Randy Rosenblum of Dolan Dobrinsky Rosenblum in Miami won a $36 million verdict with only 1 percent liability for the smoker.
The Schlefstein litigation was one of the first tobacco cases tried after the Florida Supreme Court ruled in December in Joan Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., another case tried by Alvarez and Paige. The court ruled the comparative fault statute does not apply in tobacco cases that spun off from the Engle statewide class action if the jury finds the defendant liable for intentional torts.
Alvarez said R.J. Reynolds might have withdrawn the comparative fault defense in the Schlefstein case because defense counsel knew there would be no reduction in the award if the jury found the tobacco company responsible for fraud and conspiracy.
“Whatever percentage the jury puts down for comparative fault, it gets wiped away, because they were found guilty of a fraud,” he said. ”I'm not sure if the defendants withdrew comparative fault because me and Gary have been so successful lately getting that number down to zero or close to zero, or because of Schoeff.”
R.J. Reynolds filed post-trial motions calling for a new trial or reduction in the judgment, arguing the plaintiff did not show the cigarettes were defective or provide evidence for the economic damages claim amount. The jury also should not have awarded medical expenses that were paid by insurance, the company argues.
Case: Leslie Schlefstein v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Case No.: CACE08022558
Description: Tobacco
Filing date: May 20, 2008
Verdict date: Feb. 5, 2018
Judge: Broward Circuit Judge Mily Rodriguez Powell
Plaintiffs attorneys: Alex Alvarez, The Alvarez Law Firm, Coral Gables; Gary Paige, Gordon & Doner, Davie
Defense attorneys: W. Ray Persons and Kathryn Lehman, Atlanta, Scott Edson, Washington, King & Spalding
Verdict amount: $41.8 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250