Ride-Sharing Numbers Add Up When Driver's Cost Could Be DUI or Accident
Does having easy access to Uber help to reduce the rates of driving under the influence?Common sense and anecdotal evidence suggest that the answer is 100 percent, yes.
February 27, 2018 at 10:40 AM
4 minute read
Does having easy access to Uber help to reduce the rates of driving under the influence?Common sense and anecdotal evidence suggest that the answer is 100 percent, yes. When the economic and societal costs of an accident and the personal expense of a conviction on driving while under the influence are weighed against a one-time credit card charge, the choice is clearer.
Logic dictates that having ride sharing apps at the tip of everyone's fingers would substantially cut the rate of drunk or buzzed driving. The power to summon a sober driver with the touch of a smartphone for a reasonable price would lead most reasonable people to guess that DUI (DWI in some states) rates have fallen substantially across the nation. However, a closer look at the available studies seem to paint a murkier picture as to the effects of ride-sharing as it relates to DUI rates.
Local factors such as state laws and access to public transportation can make this a hard case to prove one way or another. A study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology in October 2017 studied four major U.S. cities that suspended ride-sharing services and then reinstated them. In Portland, Oregon, automobile crashes where alcohol played a role plunged 62 percent. Yet, there was no overall change in all other injury-related crashes.
Uber's research appears to tell a different story. On its website, the company cites a 2015 Temple University study which says cities that implemented ride-sharing with Uber experienced a decrease of 3.6 percent to 5.6 percent in the number of alcohol-related automobile fatalities.
Clearly, long-term studies that take into account factors such as price, availability and alternatives to paid vehicle rides are needed. Considering the public safety benefits of reducing the number of alcohol-related traffic accidents and fatalities, more scientific research to determine the impact of having Uber on the incidence of DUI would benefit everyone.
That said, what is the impact of a DUI arrest or conviction? What are the individual effects of being at the wheel under the influence in a crash that at least causes damage or at the most, loss of life?
The financial costs are tangible and measurable. The average cost to tow and store a car once a driver has been taken into custody is about $170, according to a national survey; bail is another $150.
Those charged can expect to spend an average of $1,900 for a private attorney. Court-ordered fines average about $1,100; that figure includes cases which ended without a conviction and small or no fines imposed.
Once the vehicle insurance companies receive notice of a DUI conviction, the driver can expect to pay about $800 more per year, a surcharge that can stay in place for up to 13 years. Add to that department of motor vehicle fees averaging $260 and traffic school and/or substance abuse courses of about $360 each.
The costs can go higher. In states that require an ignition interlock device, a driver will pay $200 for purchase and installation, plus a monthly maintenance fee.
A total out-of-pocket cost of about $6,500 doesn't include lost time and wages due to incarceration and other judicial action, loss of employment, loss of insurance, personal property damage and medical bills, and civil penalties from loss claims made by those injured or killed in an accident.
The numbers, which can climb into six or seven figures based on the circumstances, make the average ride-sharing charge of $14 an obvious choice for a person who feels inebriated.
If the financial reasons don't suffice, consider the moral and emotional implications of being arrested on a DUI charge. There's possible harm to the general public, to one's family and friends, and to one's job or career. And there's the damage to oneself; a DUI may be a sign of a health problem that is not being addressed.
Even without an in-depth Uber study, common and financial sense dictate that it's a plus for society and individuals to have a low-cost, easy-to-use, ride-sharing program for inebriated individuals. When in doubt, it's wise and considerate to open one's phone and hit the Uber or Lyft button. The public, one's family and one's bank account will be grateful.
Alexander Fox is a founding partner of LewisFox, an alcohol beverage and criminal law firm in Coral Gables, Florida. He practices criminal defense for individuals and companies. He can be reached [email protected] or 305-224-1003.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
- 2The Lawyers Picked by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Term
- 3Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
- 4Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 5Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250