Miami Strip Club Shows the Money But Continues to Fight Eviction
A Miami strip club known as The Office paid a six-figure deposit that allows it to fight an eviction lawsuit.
February 28, 2018 at 01:15 PM
3 minute read
A Miami strip club operator flashed the money in an eviction case and started a fight with its landlord on a new front.
A&S Entertainment LLC, which does business as The Office, surprised its landlord when it paid more than $680,000 into escrow — the full amount claimed in their business dispute — and offered a counterclaim of its own.
“We thought that they were never going to pay because it was so much money,” said opposing counsel Eduardo “Eddie” Rasco of Rosenthal Rosenthal Rasco in Miami. “We were getting ready to take possession when lo and behold they said they were ready to wire it to the account. We said, 'Wow! We never expected them to do that.' ”
The adult entertainment club is fighting landlord CRSJ Inc., which in December filed a single-count eviction complaint for possession of the building at 250 NE 183rd St. in Miami. A&S signed a 15-year lease in 2012, setting rent at more than $48,600 per month.
A&S has been paying rent, but the landlord claimed the tenant owed a 5 percent annual increase, maintenance fees, taxes, insurance and other expenses amounting to nearly $801,875.
“I don't understand how they could have the money to pay it and just don't. I wish I knew the answer,” said Rasco, who teamed with partner Melissa Groisman. “Apparently, they have the money based upon the fact that they paid it all at once.”
A&S disputed any obligation to pay triple-net lease expenses beyond the base rent. The club also argued it never agreed to annual increases and claimed it had no obligation to provide liability insurance for the landlord.
GrayRobinson Miami shareholder Juan Martinez and Fort Lauderdale litigator Elias Hilal of Williams Hilal Wigand Grande represent the landlord. They declined comment but filed a motion asking Miami-Dade County Court Judge Caryn Schwartz to determine the rent due. The filing cites conflicting language in the lease that called for a 4 percent annual increase but an apparent typo that indicated “5%” in parentheses.
Schwartz deferred action on the insurance claim, relied on the lower figure of 4 percent to calculate the annual increase and ordered A&S to pay nearly $680,812 into escrow or the court registry.
Florida law requires tenants fighting eviction to deposit the disputed sum before raising defenses.
CRSJ's legal team expected the strip club operator, faced with the six-figure requirement, to take down its poles, pack up the glitter and vacate the building.
But A&S had other plans. After demonstrating it had the cash to cover the landlord's claims, it buckled down for an aggressive defense with a counterclaim to rewrite the lease and correct the figure describing the annual increase. The club also alleges the statute of limitations bars claims for unpaid rent predating December 2012, and CRSJ issued a defective five-day notice that incorrectly mixed alleged past-due rent with sums that aren't in default.
The high-dollar value means the eviction case will likely jump into circuit court to allow the parties to litigate some of the claims.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSouth Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger
6 minute readVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readReal Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250