A Farewell to (Fire)Arms? Thoughts on the Tipping Point for the New American Revolution
I cheer for these kids, these survivors from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, the site of just the most recent mass shooting at an American school. I cheer for their families.
March 02, 2018 at 10:00 AM
7 minute read
Preface: This follows the tragic Feb. 14, 2018, shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. As the world watched, yet another gunman entered yet another school, killing 17. The message that followed went beyond the usual “thoughts and prayers” rhetoric to which we have become accustomed. These are my personal thoughts.
I cheer for these kids, these survivors from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, the site of just the most recent mass shooting at an American school. I cheer for their families.
I cheer not because there is much to be cheery about. Not when a disaffected former student armed with an assault weapon ends the lives of 17 innocent people. Not when we witness the burials of 14 local children. Not when we see the damage a .223 caliber assault rifle does to a child's body.
I cheer not because a confluence of incompetence, bureaucracy, inertia and cowardice came together to allow this tragedy.
I cheer because we are seeing that rare point in America when logic, reason and passion bring about that most elusive event: the tipping point. Impossible to time, tipping points often never come. But much like the #MeToo movement, this tipping point comes on the heels of an America angry that a serious problem has existed for so long because inertia (and election dollars) have taken control of the political steering wheel.
I cheer because we see real strength from these Parkland survivors and their community. This strength focused them on their mission that this shooting—one of 17 school shootings this short year in America and 291st since 2013—would serve to change the way we deal with guns in this country.
I cheer because the last time we saw this kind of passion was in the 1960s. America's young adults were fed up with the Vietnam war. They took to the streets. They protested. They used coffee houses and bulletin boards and underground newspapers and radio stations and music to share their message. This was social media in the '60s. Today, these young people are organizing. They are not backing down. They are marching. Unlike the '60s, we don't see police or National Guardsmen facing them down with water cannons or attack dogs. Maybe it's due to a 24-hour news cycle. Yet maybe it's because most of America recognizes what these students know: the laws need to change … and we are way, way overdue.
I cheer for these kids because like the young adults of the '60s, it took violent deaths of peers to force change: In the '60s it was 47,000 young Americans whose flag-draped coffins were transported back to the Western hemisphere from Vietnam. Since the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012—just 6 years—there have been over 400 people shot in over 200 school shootings in this country. Not quite the 47,000 of Vietnam, but the victims of Parkland (and Columbine, Sandy Hook, Virginia Tech, etc.) were not wearing fatigues or carrying M-16 rifles.
I cheer for these kids because I, like many of my generation, resigned myself to the idea that if witnessing 20 elementary school children slaughtered at Sandy Hook couldn't move Congress, there would never be change. But I didn't foresee the tipping point. Just like Harvey Weinstein never anticipated that 84 women would come forward, which created a tipping point and gave birth to #MeToo. This created a sea change in entertainment, business and politics (though, surprisingly, much less so among elected politicians for some strange reason).
I cheer for these kids, who have buried 17 people they loved. In his book “The Tipping Point,” author Malcolm Gladwell defines this point as “the moment of critical mass, the threshold, the boiling point.”
I cheer because the Parkland students are articulate in their positions. They have a powerful drive created by the lifetime effects of a four-minute bloody confrontation with an AR-15 assault rifle.
I cheer because this school shooting splayed open for the world to see how many opportunities existed for the shooter to be stopped before he went on his spree. Rarely has a mass shooter telegraphed his plans more openly than this one. He might as well have had a T-shirt that read “I am going to shoot up the school.” The concept of “see something, say something” failed multiple times.
I cheer for them because they are where the rubber meets the road on the gun violence highway. America's affair with the assault rifle may be nearing an end. Will this movement eliminate the 300 million guns already in circulation? No. Will it stop the sales of most guns in America? No. Will it limit sales of the most casualty-inducing weapons of war? Maybe.
I cheer these kids because the focus on this national problem might actually change the way politics is done. By recognizing the power of money in campaigns, and how much financial influence the NRA asserts over elected officials, the Parkland survivors have pointed the laser beam directly at the source of the political oatmeal which has been sitting static for decades.
Finally, I cheer for these kids because it gives me at least a glimmer of hope that they might actually get out and vote. They realize that the most effective power is at the ballot box. Young adult voting has stayed at or under 50 percent turnout in almost every presidential election year, and much lower in midterm elections. Perhaps this tipping point will ignite a change in voting behavior and an involvement in the national dialogue.
There are many miles to go on this political highway, much of it paved with special interest speedbumps if not whole walls. But there is a glimmer of hope created by this movement that offers the chance to create meaningful change that will save lives.
Changing gun laws, enhancing background checks, eliminating any gun possession for those mentally ill or on watch lists, and increasing purchase age would go a long way to reducing these mass killings. So too would repealing the gun manufacturers' immunity from lawsuits, which this industry pushed through a collaborating Congress with the lubrication of the NRA's lobbying.
Most reasoned people do not suggest taking away guns from mentally capable citizens. The real changes that will need to take place begin in Congress and extend to the executive branch and the states as well. We will never see meaningful change without the continuation of this tipping point.
In the political gladiator fights, it's easy to forget that we are talking about real teens whose lives were snuffed out in our community. These were our children and teachers. They did not invite this. But now their community speaks for them.
I cheer for these survivors. And cry for these families.
John Leighton is a board-certified trial lawyer who represents plaintiffs in catastrophic injury and death cases. He is the managing partner of Leighton Law in Miami and Orland. He is a founding member of the National Crime Victim Bar Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 2Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 3Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 4When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250