The Status and Future of Medical Marijuana in Florida
Over 70 percent of the voters agreed that Amendment Two, which called for the expansion of medical marijuana should become law, and that patients who qualify should have legal access to medical marijuana.
March 08, 2018 at 10:27 AM
5 minute read
On election night in November 2016, Florida voters sent a strong message to their state government and to the federal government that the time for legalizing marijuana for qualified patients was well past. Over 70 percent of the voters agreed that Amendment Two, which called for the expansion of medical marijuana should become law, and that patients who qualify should have legal access to medical marijuana. Amendment Two provides that patients who have a qualifying ailment, as certified by a local doctor who has been qualified by the State Office of Medical Marijuana Use, can fill their medical marijuana prescriptions at one of the authorized medical marijuana treatment centers. The list of qualifying ailments include cancer, epilepsy, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, or other debilitating medical conditions of the same kind or class.
In order for a person in Florida to gain access to legal medical marijuana, he or she must seek treatment from a qualified physician to ascertain if that patient meets the eligibility requirements under the new law. The qualified physician then must, by law, input the patient's information and the order for medical marijuana into the Medical Marijuana Use Registry. At that point the patient or the patient's legal representative needs to apply for a compassionate use registry identification card. Once approved, the patient will then be able to contact one of the state licensed medical marijuana treatment centers to fill their medical marijuana prescription.
From the point of view of those who need access to medical marijuana to treat their medical conditions, the new system is obviously preferable to buying marijuana on the black market illegally. The new system provides legal protections for both the patient, doctors, growers and the retailers of the medicine. Unfortunately however, the passage of Amendment Two has not been a panacea and there are several major issues relating to access to medicine and the way the medicine can be ingested which are causing problems for patients who seek easy, legal access to medical marijuana.
First, the implementation of rules relating to the cultivation, dispensing and prescribing of the medicine were slow. Much of these delays can be attributed to the cumbersome task of essentially starting a huge new branch of the department of health. It was not an enviable task, from the point of view of state rulemakers, to have to create, essentially from scratch, a new legal system for patients, doctors, law enforcement, and regulators to have access to marijuana. After all, marijuana has been illegal under federal law since 1906, when the Congress passed the Pure Food and Drug Act. Local law has essentially tracked federal law in this regard until the current wave of legalization began several years ago. It will take several years, if not longer, for government officials, regulators and law enforcement to become used to these major changes in the way Florida looks at marijuana. For more than 100 years, marijuana has been viewed as a hard-core drug with no medical or societal benefits. Now, with the changes in attitude in our state, the government has been forced to change the way that they deal with marijuana.
Further, for people who need access to medical marijuana to treat their ailments, the new system is filled with challenges. Going to see a qualified doctor can be expensive and time consuming. Almost no insurance companies will pay for either the examinations needed to qualify for the medicine and none will pay for the costs of the medical marijuana, which can be very costly. Also, the state has limited the way in which a patient can legally ingest the medicine, which some experts say severely reduces the efficacy of the drug. The state has banned all smoking of marijuana and only allows patients to vape, or use edibles to take their medicine. Many employers also have strict anti-drug policies with regards to the workplace. It remains to be seen how an employee who has the legal right to use marijuana will be affected if their employers do not permit their employees to use the drug. Additionally, there are privacy concerns as well as all registered patients will be part of a statewide database that tracks every single legal user of marijuana in Florida.
The legalization of medical marijuana in Florida is a major step forward for patients who need the benefits that medical marijuana can provide. The voters forced the state to accept these changes and now all stakeholders, patients, their doctors, growers, retailers, law enforcement, and the state regulators must work together in order to ensure that the rules are refined and that access to medicine be safe, legal and easy.
Alexander Fox is a founding partner of LewisFox, an alcohol beverage and criminal law firm in Coral Gables. He practices criminal defense for individuals and companies. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute readSEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute readTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1I’m A Lawyer, What Can I Sell?
- 2Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates
- 3How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Don’t Be an Opportunity Killer,' Says Thomas Haskins of Barnes & Thornburg
- 4People in the News—Feb. 7, 2025—Gawthrop Greenwood, Lamb McErlane
- 5NY No-Fault Insurance Adopts Worker’s Compensation Fee Schedule
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250