Condo Board Accused of Fair Housing Act Violation for Ban on Religious Meetings
Greenberg Traurig Miami shareholder Adam Foslid filed a complaint on behalf of a Cambridge House resident in Port Charlotte.
March 12, 2018 at 03:01 PM
4 minute read
The board of a Florida residential condominium is accused of religious discrimination for prohibiting prayers and religious meetings in its social rooms.
The Cambridge House in Port Charlotte violated the Fair Housing Act when the board voted to forbid religious meetings in the common rooms, according to a complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The March 6 complaint was filed on behalf of resident Donna Dunbar against Cambridge House of Port Charlotte — a Condominium Inc. and its management company, The Gateway Group Inc. State law violations also are alleged.
Dunbar, a lay minister in the Seventh Day Adventist Church, formerly led a women's Bible study group with about 10 women, including Cambridge House residents and guests, in a common room for two hours on Monday mornings, according to the complaint.
The condo board voted Feb. 6 to prohibit prayers, religious services and religious meetings in common areas.
Gateway Management, which was hired by Cambridge House, declined to comment.
“This really is textbook housing discrimination,” said Adam Foslid, a Greenberg Traurig shareholder in Miami who filed the HUD complaint. “Under the housing section, it literally gives these examples as per se housing discrimination.”
Foslid and First Liberty Institute, a Texas-based legal organization that works on religious freedom cases, are representing Dunbar.
The discrimination claim alleges Dunbar and others were prohibited from holding religious meetings in the common room where other residents were allowed to hold secular gatherings, according to the complaint.
“In effect, the resolution manifests profound hostility to Christians, and indeed all religious residents, and discriminates against any resident who wishes to express their faith beyond the walls of their private residence,” according to the complaint.
The state law claims stem from allegations that the board didn't included the resolution in the meeting agenda and didn't inform unit owners that the proposal was coming up for a vote, according to the complaint.
Dunbar and her Bible study group faced discrimination before the condo prohibited the meetings, according to the complaint.
The board required Dunbar to get insurance to hold the Bible study meetings even though it didn't ask other groups holding movie and game nights to get insurance, the complaint alleges.
After the board vote, religious displays at Cambridge House were removed, the complaint said. Gateway Management personnel removed a St. Francis of Assisi fountain and statue and wrote residents asking them to remove crosses from their doors, according to the complaint. Also, a sign reading, 'Any and all Christian music is banned!' was posted on an organ in the lobby.
Since the resolution was adopted, Dunbar has been hosting the Bible studies in her 919-square-foot unit.
Roberto Blanch, a shareholder with Siegfried, Rivera, Hyman, Lerner, De La Torre, Mars & Sobel in Coral Gables, said there have been similar cases in Florida, but this one is slightly different.
Other cases usually allege violations under condo association regulations or the state condominium act, but this case alleges a violation of the federal Fair Housing Act, said Blanch, who focuses on community association law.
“There have been some Florida cases on similar rules, and the appellate courts have upheld the rules, but in this particular case the attorney is alleging that it is a violation under Fair Housing Act provisions — and not necessarily a violation of the condominium act,” he said. “It would be interesting to see … whether they (federal government) consider it to be a violation of the Fair Housing Act and how that may affect condominium associations.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250