In 75th Year, Fowler White Leverages Tech to Stay Ahead
Fowler White Burnett has 75 attorneys in four offices with a focus on health care, products liability, insurance, business transactions, tax issues and maritime.
March 12, 2018 at 10:59 AM
6 minute read
Richard A. Wood, Christopher E. Knight and Edward J. Briscoe lead Fowler White Burnett as managing partners of the midsize law firm, which is celebrating its 75th anniversary.
The partners responded to questions giving an overview of the firm.
How big is your firm, where is it located, and what are its primary areas of practice and focus?
Fowler White Burnett is a full-service Florida law firm with more than 75 attorneys practicing in our Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach and Naples offices. Our core practice groups include medical malpractice/health care, products liability and toxic torts, insurance, domestic and international business transactions/tax and maritime.
Please explain your firm's governance structure and compensation model.
Our firm is governed by a management committee made up of three managing shareholders elected for staggered three-year terms. The current committee is comprised of Edward J. Briscoe, Christopher E. Knight and Richard A. Wood. Our compensation system is not formulaic, but rather it is based on multiple criteria such as business generation, financial performance, profitability and a number of other intangible measures, including corporate citizenship.
What do you view as the two biggest opportunities for your firm, and what are the two biggest threats?
We are strategically growing and expanding our core practice groups to take advantage of the region's growth and have made significant investments in our maritime, insurance, product defect/mass tort and international business tax groups, including the expansion of our trademark and patent practices.
Our biggest threats are shared by all firms in the legal industry, ever increasing competition, commoditization of legal services and stiff resistance to rate increases. We have invested heavily in technology, business development and marketing for attorneys to offset these challenges.
After the recession hit, the prevailing theory was that midsize firms would start to see more work come their way from large clients who could no longer justify paying Big Law rates. What has been your experience?
We weathered the Great Recession in large part due to our longstanding firm policy of fiscal responsibility. We have historically operated with no debt. Our client base is worldwide, and we work with many out-of-state and international firms through our affiliation with ALFA International. We have enhanced our financial position since the recession and strengthened our balance sheet in virtually every aspect, and recently enjoyed some of the most successful years in the firm's history.
Are your clients pushing for more alternative fee arrangements, and if so what types? Is your firm amenable to those requests?
We are always open to discussions with our clients, and we work with them on fee arrangements when it makes sense for both the firm and the client. By investing in technology and our attorneys' practices, we have increased efficiency in the delivery of our legal services and remain highly competitive from a fee standpoint in both the traditional hourly rate as well as AFAs.
There is much debate around how law firms can foster the next generation of legal talent. What advantages and disadvantages do midsize firms have in attracting and retaining young lawyers, particularly millennials?
The firm's strategy and culture over the course of 75 years has been the recruitment and retention of highly talented attorneys and support staff. We have focused on and successfully preserved the firm's culture and maintained a highly collegial and professional workplace. We have consistently invested in our younger attorneys, providing training, legal education, leadership and business development. We have been ahead of the curve on flex time and recognizing life-work balance.
Does your firm employ any nonlawyer professionals in high-level positions (e.g. COO, business development officer, chief strategy officer, etc.)? If so, why is it advantageous to have a nonlawyer in that role? If not, have you considered hiring any?
We have an executive director with a high level of authority who overseas our nonlegal, day-to-day operations in cooperation with our management committee, along with comptroller, human resources, information technology, marketing and office services. Their expertise and focus in on the nonlegal operations of the firm and support of our attorneys' practices.
What if any technology advancements have you made in your firm in recent years? What are the challenges in implementing tech changes?
Technology, security and training are at the top of tech challenges. Yet staying abreast of the latest advances in technology, data security and training our employees are just a few of the ways in which we provide our clients with exceptional service. Our network is designed to provide cohesion and redundancy between all of our offices for us to be able to work as efficiently as possible. We give our employees access to the latest tools and software needed to handle the demands of the legal workplace today and tomorrow, whether it's through the use of our cloud-based document management system, NetDocuments, using the latest e-discovery tools like Logikcull or Relativity or providing effective tools for collaboration with other firms. Clients demand efficiency, which is achieved when all of the tools are used.
What would you say is the most innovative thing your firm has done recently, whether it be internal operations, how you work with clients, etc.?
Recently we contracted with an outside training company to maximize the software proficiency of all our attorneys, paralegals and legal assistants. We are taking it a step further and having those same people tested to become certified. Doing so further demonstrates to the market, and our clients, the firm's commitment to providing the most cost-effective legal representation possible. Our goal is to bring value to our clients and exceed their expectations. That requires us to stay focused on opportunities and leverage technology to the fullest extent possible. Finally, along with providing a solid infrastructure, the most advanced software as well as the training certification of all of our employees, our highest priority is keeping our data secure and client information safe. We provide our attorneys secure access to our systems anywhere, anytime and on any device. Protecting client data is a 24/7 responsibility we take very seriously. We are HIPAA compliant and adhere to PCI and ISO standards. We have implemented multiple layers of security to defend against cyberwarfare and use tools such as dual authentication using Duo Mobile, geo-fencing, whitelisting, data analytics, DNS
and internet monitoring, etc., to ensure our data is always secure. We are proactive and forward-thinking on all fronts rather than reactive.
Does your firm have a succession plan in place? If so, what challenges do you face in trying to execute that plan? If you don't currently have a plan, is it an issue your firm is thinking about?
Succession planning is part of our firm culture. We are currently celebrating our 75th anniversary in South Florida and continually update our strategic plan with the future in mind.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'As I've Grown Older': John Morgan Looks Back at a Life in Law
Race for Clerk and Comptroller in Miami-Dade: Juan Fernandez-Barquin vs. Sen. Annette Taddeo
11 minute readMeet Jesus M. Suarez: New Chair of the Eleventh Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250