Survivor Wants Broward Defender and State Attorney Out of Parkland School Shooting Case
Attorneys for Anthony Borges filed a motion to disqualify Broward Public Defender Howard Finkelstein and his staff, who represent defendant Nikolas Jacob Cruz.
March 13, 2018 at 08:43 PM
3 minute read
Anthony Borges, a survivor of the Feb. 14 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, filed court documents late Tuesday to remove defense counsel from the case.
Attorneys for Borges filed a motion to disqualify Broward Public Defender Howard Finkelstein and his staff, who represent defendant Nikolas Jacob Cruz. He also wants to disqualify the Office of the Broward County State Attorney, which is prosecuting Cruz for the shooting at the high school in Parkland, Florida.
Florida's Constitution gives victims the right to participate in criminal proceedings. But it is unclear how the court will interpret Borges's attempt to intervene in the case to the extent of removing attorneys handling both the prosecution and the defense.
“Victims have a right to be heard,” said Borges's attorney, Alex F. Arreaza of The Arreaza Law Firm in Wilton Manors. “But do they have a right to request what I'm requesting? That's unnavigated waters.”
Arreaza represents 15-year-old Borges, who was shot five times in his torso and both legs during the rampage at the school.
The defendant in the criminal case, Cruz, faces the death penalty after a grand jury indictment on 17 counts of first-degree premeditated murder and 17 counts of first-degree attempted murder.
The new filings claim Arreaza uncovered documents and behavior that “undermine the credibility and integrity” of the two public agencies on opposing sides of the proceedings.
The documents include a 2016 agreement among multiple agencies outlining strategies to stem the arrests of children for minor offenses on school premises.
The Collaborative Agreement on School Discipline involved the School Board of Broward County, Office of the State Attorney, Broward chief judge, the public defender, Sheriff's Office, Fort Lauderdale Police Department, Florida Department of Juvenile Justice and other agencies. Its goal was to correct the disproportionate arrests of minority children for offenses that would go unpunished for their peers.
Arreaza suggests the policy helped create an environment that shielded Cruz and masked multiple warning signs — making it a prime piece of evidence in the death penalty case. But he said he doubts either side would use the document because of their participation in its creation.
“Everybody knows he was saying he was going to be a school shooter,” Arreaza said of Cruz. “Not reporting … this kind of behavior in the state of Florida is not the answer.”
Multiple sources made reports to law enforcement, school administration and other agencies about Cruz's violent outbursts before the mass shooting that left 17 people dead and injured 14 others.
Office of the State Attorney spokeswoman Constance Simmons declined comment on the motion to disqualify, but the public defender is likely to argue that Borges lacks legal standing.
Meanwhile, Arreaza argues exclusion of the policy as evidence in Cruz's defense would present grounds for an appeal in the event of a successful prosecution.
“I don't want Anthony Borges or his family to be put through this all over again in five years,” Arreaza said. “If they go through with this thing, they're going to get reversed.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250