Sunshine State Voters Could Get Say on Government Ethics
The Florida Constitution Revision Commission advanced a sweeping ethics package, which includes a proposed six-year lobbying ban for former state lawmakers, agency heads and local government officials.
March 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM
5 minute read
The Florida Constitution Revision Commission advanced a sweeping ethics package, which includes a proposed six-year lobbying ban for former state lawmakers, agency heads and local government officials.
The 28-5 vote on the measure (Proposal 39) marked the beginning of the process of sorting through three dozen potential changes to the state Constitution. The commission, which meets every 20 years, has the unique power to place issues directly on the November 2018 ballot.
In addition to the ethics measure, the 37-member commission advanced seven other proposals to the panel's Style and Drafting Committee, which has the authority to revise the measures and group proposals on the ballot. Once approved by the committee, proposals will return to the full commission for a final vote, which will require support from at least 22 members. The commission faces a May 10 deadline for its final decisions.
The ethics proposal, sponsored by Commissioner Don Gaetz, a former Senate president from Niceville, would prohibit state lawmakers, the governor and Cabinet members from lobbying any state agency or the Legislature for six years after they leave office. The current ban is two years. The six-year ban would also be extended to state agency heads.
The measure would also impose a six-year lobbying ban on many local government officials, including county commissioners, city commissioners and school members. They would be prohibited from lobbying their former governmental bodies.
State elected officials as well as local government officials would be prohibited from lobbying other governmental agencies while in office, including the federal government.
Judges would be banned from lobbying the Legislature, state agencies and the judicial branch for six years after leaving office, although they would be allowed to represent clients in court proceedings.
The proposal also would establish a stronger ethics standard for public officials, prohibiting them from using their offices “to obtain a disproportionate benefit” for themselves, their families or their businesses. It would be up to the Florida Commission on Ethics to define “disproportionate benefit.”
If ultimately adopted by voters, Gaetz said the measure would represent “the strongest ethics standards that any state has ever adopted with respect to its public officials.”
He said part of his inspiration came from former Gov. Reubin Askew, who said he turned to constitutional changes for ethics reforms because proposals were blocked in the Legislature.
“That's not going to happen in the Florida Legislature,” Gaetz said about the ethics changes. “Gov. Askew was right, this belongs in the Constitution.”
Commissioner Rich Newsome of Orlando said the ethics proposal would be popular with voters and “would send a thunderclap” across the state.
“Floridians want this. They want to be clean. We are supposed to be the Sunshine State,” Newsome said. “Let's clean this up.”
Most of the debate came on a provision that Commissioner Tom Lee, another former Senate president from Thonotosassa, successfully added to Gaetz's measure. It would ban governmental bodies from hiring lobbyists to influence the annual appropriations process in Tallahassee.
Lee, a former Senate appropriations chairman, said he “boiled over” during the recent legislative session when he learned Hillsborough County had hired a new lobbyist as budget negotiations began because the county had funding issues tied up in a Senate budget subcommittee and the lobbyist had helped raise $1 million for the chairman.
“I hate to be on the Senate floor airing the dirty laundry [about] the way this process works,” Lee said. “But it's the truth. And we have a chance to fix it here.”
Commissioner Arthenia Joyner of Tampa objected to Lee's amendment, saying it would hurt communities represented by the minority party in the Legislature or smaller communities.
“When you're the underdog you get the crumbs if anything,” said Joyner, a former state senator. “I don't think this is going to cure it. If it does, somebody is going to be left in the dust with nothing.”
Lee's amendment passed in a 17-15 vote.
Other measures advanced Monday by the commission included:
• A proposal (Proposal 49) that would establish survivor benefits for law enforcement officers and other first responders, including active military members stationed in Florida, if they are killed “while in the line of duty.”
• A measure (Proposal 41) that would raise the mandatory retirement age for judges from 70 to 75.
• A proposal (Proposal 11) that would close the so-called write-in loophole, which allows primary elections to be limited to a single party if there are write-in candidates.
• A measure (Proposal 13) that would prohibit counties from abolishing elected offices for sheriff, property appraiser, elections supervisor and other constitutional offices if they become charter counties. It would also force charter counties that have changed those offices to return to an elected system.
The commission rejected a measure (Proposal 47) that would require judges to be members of a bar association for at least 10 years, including five in Florida, before taking office. Meanwhile, Commissioner Jose Felix Diaz of Miami withdrew a proposal (Proposal 50) that would have revised residency standards when candidates qualify to run for the Legislature.
Proposals that are placed on the ballot by the commission will require support from at least 60 percent of the voters to be enacted.
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida’s Civil Procedure Rules: Attorneys Foresee More Settlements Amid Time Challenges
3 minute readHolland & Knight Promotes 42 Lawyers to Partner, Prioritizing Corporate Practices
3 minute readData Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250