First-Impression Florida Condo Law Case Highlights Property Tax Oddity
Condo associations may challenge unit valuations as a group. But once the assessment is appealed, it's every unit owner for himself, a Florida appellate court ruled.
March 21, 2018 at 05:57 PM
2 minute read
Condo associations may not represent unit owners in property tax appeals brought by the county appraiser, even if it means flooding the courts with hundreds of nearly identical lawsuits, a Florida appellate court ruled.
The Third District Court of Appeal on Wednesday ruled against two Miami Beach condo associations, finding each individual unit owner must defend a case filed by the county property appraiser challenging an administrative board's decision to reduce the assessed value of the units.
The case was the first one in Florida examining the intersection of condominium law, which allows associations to represent unit owners in lawsuits involving “matters of common interest,” and the law governing property appraisers' appeals.
Residents of the 140-unit Central Carillon Beach Condominium and 2201 Collins Avenue Condominium, which has 180 units, cannot join one action as a class because the law requires a taxpayer to defend an appraiser's assessment appeal, the court ruled.
The judges recognized the decision might seem nonsensical, particularly because the initial administrative filing was properly made by the two condo associations before the Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board.
“Allowing an association to represent the interests of its hundred-plus unit owners in the appraiser's appeal from the VAB reductions seems eminently logical,” Third DCA Judge Vance Salter wrote, with Judges Kevin Emas and Ivan Fernandez concurring. “If a joint petition can be pursued before the VAB, why shouldn't a joint defense be allowed in the appraiser's appeal from the VAB's determinations?”
But the law is the law, the court ruled: A taxpayer must defend a property tax appeal brought by the appraiser.
“Although we appreciate the associations' arguments that judicial efficiency would be better served by allowing the associations to represent the … unit owners as a defense class in the eight lawsuits brought by the appraiser, those arguments must be presented to the Legislature rather than the courts if they are to be effectual,” the court wrote.
Miami-Dade County Attorney Abigail Price-Williams did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Assistant County Attorneys Jorge Martinez-Esteve and Daija Page Lifshitz also represented the property appraiser.
The condo associations were represented by Thomas Ward and Jason Block of Rennert Vogel Mandler & Rodriguez in Miami. Ward did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 2Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
- 3Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities Under the Second Trump Administration
- 4As Atlanta Partners Moved to Am Law 200 Firms at a Higher Rate in 2024, 2 New Arrivals Benefited
- 5A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250