First-Impression Florida Condo Law Case Highlights Property Tax Oddity
Condo associations may challenge unit valuations as a group. But once the assessment is appealed, it's every unit owner for himself, a Florida appellate court ruled.
March 21, 2018 at 05:57 PM
2 minute read
Condo associations may not represent unit owners in property tax appeals brought by the county appraiser, even if it means flooding the courts with hundreds of nearly identical lawsuits, a Florida appellate court ruled.
The Third District Court of Appeal on Wednesday ruled against two Miami Beach condo associations, finding each individual unit owner must defend a case filed by the county property appraiser challenging an administrative board's decision to reduce the assessed value of the units.
The case was the first one in Florida examining the intersection of condominium law, which allows associations to represent unit owners in lawsuits involving “matters of common interest,” and the law governing property appraisers' appeals.
Residents of the 140-unit Central Carillon Beach Condominium and 2201 Collins Avenue Condominium, which has 180 units, cannot join one action as a class because the law requires a taxpayer to defend an appraiser's assessment appeal, the court ruled.
The judges recognized the decision might seem nonsensical, particularly because the initial administrative filing was properly made by the two condo associations before the Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board.
“Allowing an association to represent the interests of its hundred-plus unit owners in the appraiser's appeal from the VAB reductions seems eminently logical,” Third DCA Judge Vance Salter wrote, with Judges Kevin Emas and Ivan Fernandez concurring. “If a joint petition can be pursued before the VAB, why shouldn't a joint defense be allowed in the appraiser's appeal from the VAB's determinations?”
But the law is the law, the court ruled: A taxpayer must defend a property tax appeal brought by the appraiser.
“Although we appreciate the associations' arguments that judicial efficiency would be better served by allowing the associations to represent the … unit owners as a defense class in the eight lawsuits brought by the appraiser, those arguments must be presented to the Legislature rather than the courts if they are to be effectual,” the court wrote.
Miami-Dade County Attorney Abigail Price-Williams did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Assistant County Attorneys Jorge Martinez-Esteve and Daija Page Lifshitz also represented the property appraiser.
The condo associations were represented by Thomas Ward and Jason Block of Rennert Vogel Mandler & Rodriguez in Miami. Ward did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readCrypto Entrepreneur Claims Justice Department’s Software Crackdown Violates US Constitution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250