IRS Opens the Door Wider to Whistleblowers
Few words strike more fear in Americans than IRS audit. But now, a new law arms IRS agents with more ammunition in its pursuit for underreported income and illegal activity as the IRS takes a giant step to embracing and rewarding whistleblowers who provide the IRS with valuable information.
March 26, 2018 at 10:14 AM
4 minute read
Few words strike more fear in Americans than IRS audit. But now, a new law arms IRS agents with more ammunition in its pursuit for underreported income and illegal activity as the IRS takes a giant step to embracing and rewarding whistleblowers who provide the IRS with valuable information.
Recently, there has been a significant development that substantially impacts IRS whistleblower claims. After years of ambiguity and uncertainty, a new law has cleared the way for tax whistleblowers to finally get paid top dollar for original information provided to the IRS.
The IRS has a program that allows tax whistleblowers to receive between 15 to 30 percent of any proceeds the IRS collects based upon original information provided by the whistleblower. For years, the IRS has fought with whistleblowers as to what should be considered “proceeds” under the program, arguing that any fines or penalties obtained by the IRS due to a whistleblower's information should not be credited in the award to the whistleblower.
After much litigation and lobbying, the U.S. Congress finally stepped in and adopted a broader definition of “proceeds” so that whistleblowers can receive the full benefit of their cooperation. New legislation signed into law by President Donald Trump now settles the debate and whistleblowers are the clear winners. Under the new definition of “proceeds” under the statute, IRS whistleblowers will be paid a percentage of whatever criminal fines, forfeiture, or nontax related penalties the IRS collects.
Blow a whistle on a bank and the bank pays a fine, the whistleblower stands to collect tens of millions of dollars. Turn in a businessman with an undeclared foreign bank account in Switzerland and the IRS collects a penalty, the whistleblower can receive a portion of the monies hidden offshore. Expose a corporate scheme to cook the books and the IRS acts, the whistleblower stands to collect.
|Cryptocurrencies and Nontax Penalties and Seizures Are Now Subject to Whistleblower Award
The new law also opens the door to potential whistleblowing to the IRS in the world of cryptocurrencies. One of the major perceived advantages of cryptocurrencies is that their use makes it difficult, if not impossible, for the IRS, or other regulators, to accurately track profit. If a whistleblower is aware of the use of cryptocurrency in order to evade taxes and the IRS begins an audit and then the IRS collects money, the whistleblower will benefit. Under the new law, if the cryptocurrency was used for an illegal purpose, like a fraud scheme, and the IRS seizes the actual cryptocurrency, the whistleblower will receive between 15 and 30 percent of the seized bitcoin.
In traditional qui tam actions, the relator, or whistleblower, normally waits on the sideline as a parallel criminal proceeding takes precedent over the civil qui tam complaint. If the United States intervenes, the relator will not collect on any criminal fines paid to the United States. Additionally, whistleblower programs administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exempt criminal fines and penalties. The new broader definition of proceeds creates the incentive to provide information to the IRS because criminal fines and forfeiture are now ripe for collection.
For nearly a decade, the IRS has aggressively pursued taxpayers with assets and bank accounts concealed outside of the United States. The penalties for not reporting these foreign assets to the United States are draconian. Worst case scenario, the IRS could actually collect a penalty in excess of the unreported assets held outside the United States. The new law now makes penalties associated with not disclosing foreign assets, including not filing a Foreign Bank Account Report (FBAR), subject to whistleblower collection.
As a general minimum threshold, IRS whistleblower claims must involve more than $2 million in controversy.
The IRS whistleblower program is still far from perfect, but with these new changes the Treasury and whistleblowers stand to collect a significant amount of newly found money.
Jeffrey A. Neiman is a former federal prosecutor and a founding partner at Marcus Neiman & Rashbaum (MNR). Over the last few years, MNR has submitted more than $2 billion in IRS whistleblower claims. MNR also regularly defends taxpayers under investigation by the IRS.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 2Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 3Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 4Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250