DOL's New PAID Program Offers Employers Incentives, But May Not Outweigh the Risks
Recently, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the Department of Labor (DOL) announced a pilot program, called the payroll audit independent determination (PAID) program, to facilitate the payment of back wages owed to employees and accidentally not paid by employers in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
March 27, 2018 at 10:25 AM
5 minute read
Recently, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the Department of Labor (DOL) announced a pilot program, called the payroll audit independent determination (PAID) program, to facilitate the payment of back wages owed to employees and accidentally not paid by employers in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The DOL's goal in initiating the PAID program is to resolve FLSA violations “expeditiously and without litigation.” To encourage employers to self-report their violations in accordance with the program, the WHD assured employers that it will not require the payment of liquidated damages or civil monetary penalties by employers who participate in the program, although it will require the employers to pay all back wages owed (i.e., all minimum wage and overtime pay owed).
This article explains the PAID program and the potential advantages and disadvantages to employers who voluntarily choose to use the program.
The Typical Resolution of FLSA Violations
For FLSA violations that are not resolved pursuant to the PAID program, an employer may be obligated to pay the unpaid minimum wages and overtime pay, an equal amount as liquidated damages and an employee's attorney fees and costs. An employer who willfully violates the FLSA can also be subject to civil and criminal penalties. Typically, the failure of an employer to pay minimum wage or overtime pay pursuant to the FLSA is resolved through a DOL investigation or a lawsuit by an employee or group of employees.
The New Alternative: The PAID Program
Now, if an employer chooses to self-report an FLSA violation under the PAID program rather than waiting for the DOL or an employee to uncover the violation, the employer may avoid litigation (and the associated costs), the imposition of liquidated damages and civil monetary penalties. Of course, the employer will have to pay 100 percent of the back wages owed.
Any FLSA-covered employer is eligible to participate in the program, provided it:
- Has not received a communication from an employee or employee representative expressing an interest in litigating or resolving the issue;
- Is not already litigating the issue; and
- The WHD is not already investigating the employer with respect to the issue.
To use the PAID program, an employer must audit its pay practices and agree to correct any errors in the future. If an employer determines that its pay practices violate the FLSA, or if an employer believes its practices are questionable and wants to resolve any potential FLSA claims, the employer must:
- Identify the potential violations, the relevant timeframe and the employees affected; and
- Calculate the back wages owed.
After undertaking these steps, the employer will contact the WHD. Unless the WHD denies an employer's request to participate in the program, it will inform the employer how to submit additional required information, evidence and certifications. After assessing the information, the WHD will notify affected employees and issue a summary of unpaid wages, as well as forms describing the settlement terms for each employee. Employee releases will be limited to the potential violations being paid, and employers will be required to pay the back wages by the end of the next pay period after receiving the summary of unpaid wages.
The WHD plans to implement the PAID program for approximately six months before evaluating whether to continue or modify it.
Risks of Participation in the PAID Program
Although the WHD has not fully disclosed the contents of the program, some potential advantages and disadvantages are already apparent. The potential advantages are obvious: the avoidance of liquidated damages, civil monetary penalties and attorneys' fees and costs. But, an employer only obtains those advantages if the affected employees accept the back wages. That means the potential disadvantages of the program include the risk that an employer alerts the WHD and its employees to violations, and the employees choose not to accept the back wages but instead file suit to seek all available remedies under the FLSA. In other words, an employer may actually increase its risk of litigation by participating in the program.
Additionally, even if the affected employees accept the back wages owed, an employer will not receive a broad release from the employees; the releases will be limited to the FLSA violations identified and paid under the program. Moreover, the WHD will not waive its right to investigate an employer in the future, and the WHD can deny an employer's request to participate in the program. Finally, the PAID program will (presumably) not resolve any wage claims under state law, which will leave employers who settle FLSA violations with employees under the PAID program vulnerable to lawsuits (perhaps from those same employees) for violations of state law.
The degree to which these risks may be realized cannot be fully determined until the DOL issues specific and final guidelines and documents for the PAID program.
Guidance for Employers
As noted, once the WHD implements the PAID program and provides additional materials relating thereto, more potential advantages and disadvantages may become apparent. Given the risks associated with FLSA violations and the PAID program, employers should consult employment counsel to assess any potential FLSA violations prior to participating in the PAID program.
Alicia H. Koepke is a shareholder with Trenam in Tampa. She focuses her practice on employment and business law and related litigation. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250