'This Will Not Do,' Federal Judge Says of Florida's Voter-Restoration Process
U.S. District Judge Mark Walker of the Northern District of Florida in Tallahassee issued a permanent injunction requiring Florida's Executive Clemency Board to establish a new voting rights restoration process for former felons by April 26.
March 28, 2018 at 11:21 AM
4 minute read
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the state of Florida to clear a path for restoring voting rights to former felons who've served their time.
U.S. District Judge Mark Walker of the Northern District of Florida issued a permanent injunction requiring Florida's Executive Clemency Board to establish a new voting rights restoration process for released felons by April 26.
“This Court is not the Vote-Restoration Czar. It does not pick and choose who may receive the right to vote and who may not. Nor does it write the rules and regulations for the Executive Clemency Board. Instead, this Court possesses the well-known and unsurprising 'province and duty . . . to say what the law is,'” Walker wrote. “And this Court possesses the unremarkable discretion to find a means for the Board to comply with the law.”
The ruling comes in a lawsuit James Michael Hand and others filed in March 2017 against Gov. Rick Scott and the clemency board alleging that there are arbitrary barriers to restoring voting rights that violate the U.S. Constitution.
Walker, sitting in Tallahassee, found fault with the state's system but said he did not have the authority to authorize Hand's suggested solution. “Plaintiffs would have this Court restore the right to vote to any former felon who has completed her whole sentence and a uniformly imposed five- or seven-year waiting period,” Walker said. “But such relief is beyond the scope of this Court's authority.”
At the same time, the state “essentially repackage[s] the current scheme into proposed remedies permitting the Governor and Board to do, as the Governor described, 'whatever we want' in denying voting rights to hundreds of thousands of their constituents,” Walker wrote. “This will not do. And Defendants' proposed remedy to abandon the whole vote-restoration scheme does not pass constitutional muster.”
Walker pointed to guidance from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. “If binding precedent spanning decades is to guide this Court—as it must—then an injunction must ensue to prevent further infringement,” Walker ruled. “Florida's vote-restoration scheme can no longer violate Plaintiffs' fundamental First Amendment rights.”
Walker ordered the board to establish “specific and neutral criteria to direct vote-restoration decisions,” and “meaningful, specific, and expeditious time constraints” for the voting rights restoration process. He suggested no one should have to wait more than an election cycle for a decision on their application. The judge said this relief “is appropriate to ensure that Florida's vote-restoration scheme is no longer based on unfettered discretion.”
Fair Elections Legal Network and the law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll represent the plaintiffs.
“Today the Court has ordered Defendants to make meaningful changes to Florida's voting rights restoration scheme that will eliminate the risk of arbitrary and discriminatory decision-making and not merely serve as smoke screens,” Jon Sherman, senior counsel at the Fair Elections Legal Network, said in a news release Tuesday. “This is a victory for the principle that the right to vote cannot be subjected to officials' gut instincts and whims. We are also heartened that the Court prevented Florida from following through on its threat to become the only state in the nation with an irrevocable lifetime ban on voting for all former felons—what the Court called 'the ultimate arbitrary act.'”
Ted Leopold of Cohen Milstein issued a statement in the same news release. “This ruling continues to shed sunlight on what we as citizens hold so precious in our democracy, the right of all citizens to exercise their right to vote,” said Leopold, a partner and chair of the firm's catastrophic injury & wrongful death practice.
Attorney General Pam Bondi represented the governor and the board. The AG's spokeswoman said by email, “We are reviewing the ruling.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
- 2Trying to Reason With Hurricane Season: Mediating First Party Property Insurance Claims
- 3People in the News—Dec. 12, 2024—Pietragallo Gordon, Fox Rothschild
- 4Recent Decisions from the United States District Court for the Eastern District
- 5SoundCloud GC Takes Legal Reins of Condé Nast at Tumultuous Time
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250