Disbarment Recommended for 2 South Florida Lawyers
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Dava Tunis, who is serving as the court-appointed referee, recommended disbarment for Bernardo Roman III and Jose Maria “Pepe” Herrera for their work on lawsuits against Lewis Tein and attorneys at the firm.
March 29, 2018 at 12:45 PM
3 minute read
A court-appointed referee recommended disbarment for two South Florida attorneys over a long-running dispute involving their work for the Miccosukee Tribe.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Dava Tunis is serving as the referee in Florida Bar disciplinary cases against former Miccosukee Tribe attorney Bernardo Roman III of Coral Gables and Miami attorney Jose Maria “Pepe” Herrera.
The litigation stemmed from a feud among attorneys. Miami-Dade Circuit Judge John W. Thornton determined Roman and Herrera pulled a rival law firm, Lewis Tein, into years of frivolous litigation, and disciplinary proceedings followed.
In reports released late Wednesday, Tunis recommended disbarment for both Roman and Herrera. The lawyers' fate now rests with the Florida Supreme Court, which has the final word on attorney discipline.
Roman, who faces permanent disbarment, did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Herrera, meanwhile, faces a 10-year ban. His lead trial counsel, Herman J. Russomanno III, said the attorney intends to fight to keep his law license.
“We believe the court's recommendation of disbarment is not supported by the facts or law, and we intend to appeal,” said Russomanno, a partner at Russomanno & Borello in Miami.
Tunis' reports followed a sanctions hearing for Roman in July and a final hearing for Herrera a month earlier. They cite Roman's “misconduct in three separate lawsuits” he filed in state and federal court against Lewis Tein and its partners, former U.S. Attorney Guy Lewis and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Tein.
The allegations claimed Lewis Tein billed the tribe for millions of dollars in “fictitious, excessive, exorbitant and unsubstantiated legal fees.”
Tunis would later find that Herrera knew the lawsuits raised false allegations about Lewis Tein and its partners but withheld evidence that would have cleared them of wrongdoing.
Tunis listed a “dishonest or selfish motive” and “a pattern of misconduct” among five aggravating factors in Herrera's case. She also considered the attorney's lack of prior disciplinary actions.
In October, the judge recommended the Florida Supreme Court find Herrera guilty of violating six rules regulating the Florida Bar.
The latest report showed eight factors weighed against Roman who, among other things, submitted false evidence and refused to acknowledge wrongdoing. He, too, had no disciplinary record before the Lewis Tein feud.
The referee recommended the high court find Roman guilty of 55 charges, including eight counts of counseling or assisting a client in criminal or fraudulent behavior. She cleared him of two counts of fabricating evidence or counseling a witness to offer false testimony.
Roman filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection in November, about a week after a judge ordered him to pay Lewis Tein and its name partners $562,264 in attorney fees for more than five years of litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Court's Reversal of Attorney Fees Triggered by Client's Death
4 minute readCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Florida Judge Threatened With Assault, Kidnapping and Death
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250