Disbarment Recommended for 2 South Florida Lawyers
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Dava Tunis, who is serving as the court-appointed referee, recommended disbarment for Bernardo Roman III and Jose Maria “Pepe” Herrera for their work on lawsuits against Lewis Tein and attorneys at the firm.
March 29, 2018 at 12:45 PM
3 minute read
A court-appointed referee recommended disbarment for two South Florida attorneys over a long-running dispute involving their work for the Miccosukee Tribe.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Dava Tunis is serving as the referee in Florida Bar disciplinary cases against former Miccosukee Tribe attorney Bernardo Roman III of Coral Gables and Miami attorney Jose Maria “Pepe” Herrera.
The litigation stemmed from a feud among attorneys. Miami-Dade Circuit Judge John W. Thornton determined Roman and Herrera pulled a rival law firm, Lewis Tein, into years of frivolous litigation, and disciplinary proceedings followed.
In reports released late Wednesday, Tunis recommended disbarment for both Roman and Herrera. The lawyers' fate now rests with the Florida Supreme Court, which has the final word on attorney discipline.
Roman, who faces permanent disbarment, did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Herrera, meanwhile, faces a 10-year ban. His lead trial counsel, Herman J. Russomanno III, said the attorney intends to fight to keep his law license.
“We believe the court's recommendation of disbarment is not supported by the facts or law, and we intend to appeal,” said Russomanno, a partner at Russomanno & Borello in Miami.
Tunis' reports followed a sanctions hearing for Roman in July and a final hearing for Herrera a month earlier. They cite Roman's “misconduct in three separate lawsuits” he filed in state and federal court against Lewis Tein and its partners, former U.S. Attorney Guy Lewis and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Tein.
The allegations claimed Lewis Tein billed the tribe for millions of dollars in “fictitious, excessive, exorbitant and unsubstantiated legal fees.”
Tunis would later find that Herrera knew the lawsuits raised false allegations about Lewis Tein and its partners but withheld evidence that would have cleared them of wrongdoing.
Tunis listed a “dishonest or selfish motive” and “a pattern of misconduct” among five aggravating factors in Herrera's case. She also considered the attorney's lack of prior disciplinary actions.
In October, the judge recommended the Florida Supreme Court find Herrera guilty of violating six rules regulating the Florida Bar.
The latest report showed eight factors weighed against Roman who, among other things, submitted false evidence and refused to acknowledge wrongdoing. He, too, had no disciplinary record before the Lewis Tein feud.
The referee recommended the high court find Roman guilty of 55 charges, including eight counts of counseling or assisting a client in criminal or fraudulent behavior. She cleared him of two counts of fabricating evidence or counseling a witness to offer false testimony.
Roman filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection in November, about a week after a judge ordered him to pay Lewis Tein and its name partners $562,264 in attorney fees for more than five years of litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPlaintiffs Allege Carollo Retaliated Over Bayfront Trust Accounting Discoveries
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250