AIDS Foundation Fights Getting Shut Out of Medicaid
The largest nonprofit AIDS health care provider in the nation is at risk of being blocked out of South Florida's Medicaid market.
March 30, 2018 at 12:48 PM
4 minute read
The largest nonprofit AIDS health care provider in the nation is at risk of being blocked out of South Florida's Medicaid market.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation attorneys filed a written protest and requested a hearing after its managed-care division was not among the health plans selected to negotiate with state Medicaid officials to continue providing care in Miami-Dade, Broward and Monroe counties beginning in 2019.
As of March 1, nearly 2,000 people in South Florida with HIV or AIDS were enrolled in Positive Healthcare, the managed-care plan.
“It is inconceivable that such an experienced plan would have its proposal to continue operating as an HIV/AIDS specialty plan scored so low compared to other plans without the same experience or provider network,” Jeffrey Blend, Positive Healthcare assistant general counsel, wrote, noting that it scored well below other plans that responded to a state contracting process known as an “invitation to negotiate.”
Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary Justin Senior denied the request for a hearing, saying the issues weren't ripe for challenge because the state hadn't finalized negotiations.
The dispute comes as part of a broader process by the AHCA to award new contracts in the state's Medicaid managed-care system. Total five-year contracts could be worth up to $90 billion, with contracts awarded to health plans in different regions of the state.
The state issued its invitation to negotiate, the second under the Medicaid managed-care program, in July 2017. The winning bids are expected to be announced on April 16. The state will transition from current health plans under contract to new plans at the end of 2018, according to state documents.
In its protest, Positive Healthcare alleged that “upon information and belief” the state is negotiating with two other specialty plans for the treatment of HIV-positive people in the South Florida regions 10 and 11: Clear Health Alliance and United Healthcare of Florida Inc.
Like Positive Healthcare, Clear Health Alliance already is a contracted specialty health plan that's available for HIV-positive people. United Healthcare has contracts for long-term care services and traditional managed care but not specialty care, such as HIV or AIDS.
Michael Rajner, an activist living with HIV in Broward County, said he wasn't aware that Positive Healthcare was at risk of losing its Medicaid contract but said that “could be harmful for people living with HIV that have enjoyed access to that plan and particular providers because it could force them to establish a new relationship with a new physician, and that doesn't benefit patients.”
The Legislature passed a sweeping rewrite of the state's Medicaid program in 2011, requiring nearly all beneficiaries, from the cradle to the grave, to enroll in managed-care plans. Eleven managed-care organizations, including Positive Healthcare, were awarded contracts after the state's first invitation to negotiate.
For contracting purposes, the state is divided into 11 regions. State law establishes a minimum and maximum number of plans that can operate in each of the 11 regions. Positive Healthcare operates only in Broward, Miami Dade and Monroe counties.
Positive Healthcare isn't the only managed care plan currently under contract that has been snubbed in the second round of bidding. Molina Healthcare disclosed in a recent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing that its Florida subsidiary, Molina Healthcare of Florida, was invited to negotiate a new contract only in the Miami-Dade region.
Molina Healthcare of Florida currently has contracts in eight regions, and Medicaid premiums from the plan accounted for 8 percent of Molina Healthcare's projected revenues in 2018.
The filing noted that the company “intends to take all appropriate actions to both protect its rights and ensure continuity of care for its members,” according to the filing.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250