South Florida Lawyers Win $3.1M Verdict Against New York Investors
Attorneys Gregory S. Weiss and Alan B. Rose, of Mrachek Fitzgerald Rose Konopka Thomas & Weiss, also defeated a counterclaim by New York-based investment group, Reliance Agency Network LLC.
April 02, 2018 at 12:25 PM
4 minute read
West Palm Beach attorneys from Mrachek Fitzgerald Rose Konopka Thomas & Weiss won a $3.17 million verdict and defeated a counterclaim by New York-based investment group, Reliance Agency Network LLC.
Shareholders Gregory S. Weiss and Alan B. Rose represented Michael Buza, who sued Reliance over its purchase of his insurance business in Florida.
Buza owned 12 insurance agencies the investors agreed to purchase for $18.8 million, according to the amended complaint filed in March 2017. The parties set the sale price based on the business' 2015 profits, and held $3.3 million of the purchase price in escrow to cover any unexpected expenses that arose after the deal closed.
Buza said he'd spent years building the business by acquiring independent agencies across Florida. His lawyers say the buyers approached Buza with what he thought was a cash offer. But they say through evidence at trial, he later learned Reliance took a $16 million loan.
The loan bolstered Buza's claims the buyers were too cash-strapped to run their new acquisition, and had no capital for the transition.
“They didn't have funds set aside to operate the business after closing,” Weiss said. “Not only that, but they closed or consolidated a couple of the offices that we had established.”
In other words, Buza claimed the New York buyers knew little about the Florida market, and lost money by mismanaging the business. He claimed the purchase agreement included a provision for Reliance to keep him on board as consulting manager for 12 months at a $500,000 salary.
But the deal started to unravel within weeks, and Reliance canceled Buza's consulting contract after the first month.
“What they told our client and what came out at trial is they basically could not afford to pay him his salary because they were cash-strapped,” Weiss said.
Reliance painted a different picture. It filed 12 affirmative defenses and a counterclaim, alleging breach of contract against Buza, whom it claimed misrepresented the companies' profitability.
Defense counsel, Zachary Glaser and David Adams of Bennett Jacobs & Adam in Tampa, did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
But their court pleadings show the buyer claimed Buza inflated the earnings and revenue used to calculate the sale price by as much as $9 million. They argued Reliance purchased the business in June 2016, only to learn the revenue for the second half of the year fell far short of what Buza had led them to expect.
Reliance then moved to collect the money held in escrow, plus claimed the seller owed it about $6 million more for overstating revenue.
Weiss and Rose argued the allegations were part of a negotiating ploy.
“This was, in our view, their plan all along,” Rose said.
Weiss added: ”Our belief is they were attempting to renegotiate the purchase price after closing by taking the money from the escrow, by firing him a month into his 12-month consulting agreement, and by filing a counterclaim saying their was false or inaccurate representation in the 2015 net income.”
Palm Beach Circuit Judge Edward A. Garrison adjudicated the breach of contract suit. He sided with the plaintiff after a bench trial. He awarded Buza $3.17 million from the escrow account, after deducting post-closing expenses.
“Our client was very happy. He felt fully vindicated through the result,” Weiss said. ”It was a very stressful time for him, because he had built this business himself over more than a decade, and he was very personally invested in (its) success. … We were very happy to be able to get him made whole in the end.”
Case: Florida Insurance Advisory Group LLC, Florida Insurance Advisory Group II LLC, MRB & Associates II LLC, MRB & Associates III LLC, Florida Property & Casualty Insurance Agency LLC, and Insurance Advisors of South Florida LLC v. Reliance Agency Network LLC and DeSoto Moulton LLC
Case No.: 502016CA013264XXXXMB
Description: Breach of contract
Filing date: Nov. 29, 2016
Verdict date: March 14, 2018
Judge: Palm Beach Circuit Judge Edward A. Garrison
Plaintiff attorneys: Gregory Weiss and Alan Rose, Mrachek Fitzgerald Rose Konopka Thomas & Weiss, West Palm Beach
Defense attorneys: Zachary Glaser and David Adams, Bennett Jacobs & Adams, Tampa
Verdict amount: $3.17 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250