New Sentencing Ordered in Carlie Brucia Kidnap-Murder
The Florida Supreme Court rules a unanimous jury verdict is required to impose the death penalty on the man convicted in the infamous videotaped kidnapping.
April 05, 2018 at 12:23 PM
2 minute read
A new sentencing hearing was ordered Thursday in the notorious kidnapping, rape and murder of 11-year-old Carlie Brucia by a stranger who was caught on camera leading her away from a carwash.
The Florida Supreme Court authorized the new penalty phase to comply with a U.S. Supreme Court order in 2016 requiring unanimous jury decisions to impose the death penalty. Joseph P. Smith was sentenced to death after a 10-2 jury split.
Sarasota Circuit Judge Charles Roberts granted Smith's motion for a new sentencing last summer based on the ruling in Hurst v. Florida, but the state attorney general's office appealed.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-1 that Smith was protected by Hurst and entitled to a new hearing, which would amount to a mini-trial to introduce the crime to a new jury, which would determine the sentence and factors justifying it. The conviction remains intact.
Justice C. Alan Lawson dissented with a February case citation but no explanation. In the earlier case, Lawson dissented and said he would apply the proper rational jury test to Hurst-driven appeals.
Carlie was walking home from a friend's house when a car wash surveillance camera showed them crossing paths and exchanging a few words before Smith led her away by the arm in 2004. The manhunt for her kidnapper received national attention based on the video and her mother's heart-rending appeals for the return of her daughter.
Smith had been released from prison 13 months earlier and was on parole. He was in custody on a parole violation when tipsters identified him as the man in the video. Days later, Smith told his brother where to find Carlie's body, which was in woods behind a church.
In its unsigned opinion, the Supreme Court said: “The jury did not make the requisite factual findings and did not unanimously recommend a sentence of death. Instead, the jury recommended the sentence of death by a vote of ten to two. Therefore, this court has no way of knowing if the jury unanimously found any of the five valid aggravating factors.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 2Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
- 3Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities Under the Second Trump Administration
- 4As Atlanta Partners Moved to Am Law 200 Firms at a Higher Rate in 2024, 2 New Arrivals Benefited
- 5A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250