Drinker Biddle Accused of Health Care Deal Breakup Over Alleged Disclosures Tied to Miami Indictment
The lawsuit questions what an ex-federal prosecutor told a client about a "person of interest" in a $1 billion Medicare fraud case.
April 06, 2018 at 04:44 PM
4 minute read
Drinker Biddle has been hit with a complaint accusing one of its partners of improperly briefing a client on details of a Miami health care fraud investigation that he learned about while serving as a federal prosecutor.
The lawsuit claims a joint venture to establish a drug rehab center fell apart after attorney Antonio Pozos linked one of the parties in the deal to a massive Medicaid fraud case.
Hackensack University Medical Center and Carrier Foundation signed a deal with Jonathan Lasko, a manager of drug detox centers, in June 2017 to establish a rehab facility in Mahwah, New Jersey, the complaint said. But HUMC and Carrier, a behavioral health care provider in Belle Mead, New Jersey, pulled out in February after Carrier's counsel at Drinker Biddle advised them that Lasko was a “person of interest” in the Medicaid fraud investigation. Lasko is suing and says the information against him is “false, inaccurate and/or misleading” and was not a sufficient basis to abandon the joint venture.
Lasko said the source of the information was Pozos, who joined Drinker Biddle's Philadelphia office in January after three years in the Justice Department's criminal fraud section. Lasko alleged libel, false-light defamation and tortious interference with prospective business relations against Pozos and Drinker Biddle. The suit also brings a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against HUMC and Carrier. The suit seeks $17 million in damages.
Lasko and his company, JNL Management, asserted Pozos should have kept information about the Medicaid probe to himself.
The suit said officials of HUMC told a lawyer for Lasko on Feb. 16 that they would not proceed with the joint venture because a Drinker Biddle lawyer told them Lasko was tied to the case against Philip Esformes. In July 2016, Esformes, who owns over 30 skilled nursing and assisted living centers in South Florida, was indicted in a $1 billion Medicare fraud scheme.
When Assistant Attorney General Caldwell announced the indictment, he said it was “the largest single criminal health care fraud case ever brought against individuals” by federal prosecutors.
Enformes is set for trial Oct. 1 before U.S. District Judge Robert N. Scola Jr.
Drinker Biddle told the HUMC officials the Justice Department “is not done with” Lasko, and Enformes has a financial interest in Lasko's JNL company, the suit claims. In addition, the HUMC officials told Lasko's lawyer that Drinker Biddle told them Lasko has a business relationship with a man known as “Mr. Delgado,” who is involved in the Esformes case, and Lasko is under investigation for possibly referring patients to Esformes' facilities.
Brothers Gabriel and Guillermo Delgado have reached Medicare fraud plea deals with the government and have cooperated with investigators against Enformes.
“Even, assuming arguendo, that the statements were true, they should not have been disclosed by Pozos as, at a minimum, Pozos committed a violation of his duty of confidentiality. There may be additional improprieties committed by Pozos, including, without limitation, violations of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, as well as state bar rules and federal regulations, but that is not for this matter,” Lasko's suit stated. There is no publicly available information about the allegations, Lasko said in the suit.
Carrier and HUMC face a count for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
JNL attorney Holly Schepisi said she was told the information about Lasko came from Drinker Biddle through a “recently hired partner who was formerly with the DOJ,” the complaint said.
If HUMC and Carrier went ahead with the drug rehab center, Lasko said his company would have received revenue of $29 million over the next 20 years, with profits of $16.4 million.
Pozos and Drinker Biddle would not comment on the case. Lasko's lawyer, Jeffrey Lichtstein of Cohen Tauber Spievack & Wagner in New York, also declined to comment.
Mary Jo Layton, a spokeswoman for HUMC parent Hackensack Meridian Health, declined to comment. Shannon Hurley, a spokeswoman for Carrier, also declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Devil Is in the Details' When Negotiating a Profit Participation Arrangement
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250