Tenet Defeats Medicare Advantage Class Action Alleging Overpayments
Plaintiffs seek to recoup billions in payments under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act.
April 10, 2018 at 02:46 PM
3 minute read
Miami litigator Alan D. Lash helped one of South Florida's largest hospital systems beat back a putative class action lawsuit with the potential for far-reaching fallout.
The Lash & Goldberg partner worked with partner Greg Weintraub and senior counsel Dave Ruffner to represent Tenet Florida Inc. in closely watched litigation that once targeted insurance companies but now aims to recoup billions of dollars from hospitals across the country.
“This does have significant implications … industry-wide,” Lash said. “There are several of these actions that are pending in (Florida) and other states.”
Lash & Goldberg's client, Tenet, operates 10 acute-care hospitals, three standalone emergency centers, urgent-care clinics and more than 20 surgical and diagnostic imaging offices in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties.
It is one of several hospital systems in the continental U.S. and Puerto Rico facing suit in federal court from a Medicare Advantage assignee looking to recover insurance payments under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act.
The plaintiff is linked to Miami-based MSP Recovery Law Firm, which claims hospitals collected billions of dollars from Medicare and Medicaid when other insurers should have paid.
Under federal law, the public health insurance programs are set up as secondary rather than primary payers. This means any other insurer should pay before Medicare or Medicaid covers the balance on claims.
But details that emerged last year suggested federal health officials lost hundreds of millions of dollars in overpayments to Medicare Advantage health plans under. At the time, NPR reported losses for 2007 alone were about $128 million and went unnoticed until an initial round of audits.
MSP Recovery's lawsuit suggests Tenet contributed to the losses. The complaint claimed the hospital system double-billed and never returned overpayments.
Plaintiff MSPA Claims 1 LLC, an assignee of Florida Healthcare Plus Inc., filed suit against a Tenet subsidiary, St. Mary's Medical Center Inc. of West Palm Beach, pinpointing an alleged Medicare overpayment of about $286 for a beneficiary identified only by initials. It then sought class certification for a broad recovery.
“The hospital collects from both sides,” said plaintiffs lawyer John H. Ruiz, co-lead counsel in the MSP Recovery suits. “It is something that is impermissible by law and frankly unethical. … That's the nature of the beast here. There are billions upon billions of dollars that are overpaid.”
But Lash and his team argued the plaintiff lacked legal standing to sue the health care company and persuaded U.S. District Judge Kathleen M. Williams in Miami to close the case.
“The statute that the plaintiffs were suing under … the Medicare Secondary Payer Act … only allows Medicare Advantage organizations to sue insurance companies, known as primary payers,” Lash said. “Since the hospital was a provider and not a primary payer, we did not believe that the statute … gave them standing.”
Williams agreed. The judge dismissed three of the plaintiff's claims with prejudice, dismissed two others without prejudice and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over claims brought under state law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
Second DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
3 minute readFlorida Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250