Miami-Dade Postpones Brightline Courthouse Site Decision
The Brightline rail system's parent is offering one option, and the county will seek bids for development on two public parcels.
April 12, 2018 at 03:02 PM
4 minute read
A new courthouse proposed by the developer of the Brightline rail system in downtown Miami remains in the running in a step supported by some in the legal community but opposed by Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Gimenez.
The county wants a new civil and probate courthouse to replace the historic Miami-Dade County Courthouse at 73 W. Flagler St., which comes with an assortment of old-age problems from mold to termites.
Two county-owned properties being considered for a courthouse are a 21,000-square-foot site on the northwest corner of Flagler Street and Southwest First Avenue just west of the existing courthouse and a 42,000-square-foot parking lot for the Children's Courthouse at 155 NW Third St.
The County Commission voted Tuesday to postpone review of the private proposal on the north side of Flagler Street and look at it again once the county has received applications from developers bidding to build the project.
The private plan was submitted by Brightline'as parent company, Florida East Coast Industries LLC, and El Paso-based real estate company Hunt Cos. Inc. The two turned in their plan under the name New Flagler Courthouse Development Partners.
The county been trying for years to figure out where and how to build and pay for a new courthouse. A $390 million bond measure was defeated by 64 percent of voters in 2014.
Now, the county wants to pursue a public-private partnership where a developer pays the upfront costs and the public agency repays the developer over time. The PortMiami Tunnel, which connects MacArthur Causeway to the port, was built as a public-private partnership.
Miami-Dade is doing a two-step solicitation in which developers turn in their qualifications and experience by May, and a shortlist submits specific courthouse plans and cost by January, according to an April 4 memo Gimenez sent commissioners.
New Flagler Courthouse turned in its plan separately from the official call for developers. The specifics are unknown because the company asked the county to keep its plan secret.
Gimenez had said he opposes this plan in part because it would ultimately result in significantly higher costs for the county because it reduces competition from developers, according to the April 4 memo.
The mayor also has said he opposes the New Flagler site because it's part of the Cultural Center Plaza, which includes HistoryMiami and the county's central library, and is being looked at for future commercial development, according to his memo.
The existing courthouse would be sold in a separate deal under the Gimenez recommendation adopted Tuesday by the commission.
The county can sell the courthouse for more money in an independent deal, according to Gimenez. The county then could use the revenue to cover new courthouse costs.
On Tuesday, at least 10 representatives of the legal community said they support the New Flagler site, and they as well as other attorneys, judges and court reporters implored the commission to move ahead with construction.
“I work in the courthouse several times a week. I have suffered respiratory illness because of spending four days in trial in a courtroom that was later discovered to have mold. I truly worry about all of our safety every time I am in there,” said court reporter Rosa Naccarato.
She said she also supports the Flagler Street site for logistical reasons. It's closer to affordable parking, Interstate 95 and lunch spots.
The County Commission is scheduled to make the final decision in April 2019, according to Gimenez's memo.
The existing 28-floor courthouse, which opened in segregated Miami in 1928, has basement flooding and a lack of access for people with disabilities. Work was recently completed to restore its crumbling stone facade. Courtrooms on upper floors have columns blocking the line of sight for judges, attorneys and spectators.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllYacht Broker Says It 'Has Done Nothing Wrong.' Asks Miami Court to Dismiss the Case
Hyper-Reality Revisited: A Tour of Waldorf Astoria Hotel & Residences Miami
5 minute read10 Years Later, This High Court Fight Over Real Estate Commissions Is Far From Over
4 minute readBroward Judge Awards $9.9M in Attorney Fees and Costs After $33M Salmon Settlement
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250