Miami-Dade Postpones Brightline Courthouse Site Decision
The Brightline rail system's parent is offering one option, and the county will seek bids for development on two public parcels.
April 12, 2018 at 03:02 PM
4 minute read
A new courthouse proposed by the developer of the Brightline rail system in downtown Miami remains in the running in a step supported by some in the legal community but opposed by Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Gimenez.
The county wants a new civil and probate courthouse to replace the historic Miami-Dade County Courthouse at 73 W. Flagler St., which comes with an assortment of old-age problems from mold to termites.
Two county-owned properties being considered for a courthouse are a 21,000-square-foot site on the northwest corner of Flagler Street and Southwest First Avenue just west of the existing courthouse and a 42,000-square-foot parking lot for the Children's Courthouse at 155 NW Third St.
The County Commission voted Tuesday to postpone review of the private proposal on the north side of Flagler Street and look at it again once the county has received applications from developers bidding to build the project.
The private plan was submitted by Brightline'as parent company, Florida East Coast Industries LLC, and El Paso-based real estate company Hunt Cos. Inc. The two turned in their plan under the name New Flagler Courthouse Development Partners.
The county been trying for years to figure out where and how to build and pay for a new courthouse. A $390 million bond measure was defeated by 64 percent of voters in 2014.
Now, the county wants to pursue a public-private partnership where a developer pays the upfront costs and the public agency repays the developer over time. The PortMiami Tunnel, which connects MacArthur Causeway to the port, was built as a public-private partnership.
Miami-Dade is doing a two-step solicitation in which developers turn in their qualifications and experience by May, and a shortlist submits specific courthouse plans and cost by January, according to an April 4 memo Gimenez sent commissioners.
New Flagler Courthouse turned in its plan separately from the official call for developers. The specifics are unknown because the company asked the county to keep its plan secret.
Gimenez had said he opposes this plan in part because it would ultimately result in significantly higher costs for the county because it reduces competition from developers, according to the April 4 memo.
The mayor also has said he opposes the New Flagler site because it's part of the Cultural Center Plaza, which includes HistoryMiami and the county's central library, and is being looked at for future commercial development, according to his memo.
The existing courthouse would be sold in a separate deal under the Gimenez recommendation adopted Tuesday by the commission.
The county can sell the courthouse for more money in an independent deal, according to Gimenez. The county then could use the revenue to cover new courthouse costs.
On Tuesday, at least 10 representatives of the legal community said they support the New Flagler site, and they as well as other attorneys, judges and court reporters implored the commission to move ahead with construction.
“I work in the courthouse several times a week. I have suffered respiratory illness because of spending four days in trial in a courtroom that was later discovered to have mold. I truly worry about all of our safety every time I am in there,” said court reporter Rosa Naccarato.
She said she also supports the Flagler Street site for logistical reasons. It's closer to affordable parking, Interstate 95 and lunch spots.
The County Commission is scheduled to make the final decision in April 2019, according to Gimenez's memo.
The existing 28-floor courthouse, which opened in segregated Miami in 1928, has basement flooding and a lack of access for people with disabilities. Work was recently completed to restore its crumbling stone facade. Courtrooms on upper floors have columns blocking the line of sight for judges, attorneys and spectators.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllYacht Broker Says It 'Has Done Nothing Wrong.' Asks Miami Court to Dismiss the Case
Hyper-Reality Revisited: A Tour of Waldorf Astoria Hotel & Residences Miami
5 minute read10 Years Later, This High Court Fight Over Real Estate Commissions Is Far From Over
4 minute readBroward Judge Awards $9.9M in Attorney Fees and Costs After $33M Salmon Settlement
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 2Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 3'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 4Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 5Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250