Downtown Miami Hyatt, Courtyard Marriott on Path to Tall Towers
The city-owned James L. Knight Center would disappear as part of the transformation.
April 16, 2018 at 03:32 PM
4 minute read
Two proposals for downtown Miami towers are poised to transform a two-block stretch along Southeast Second Avenue north of the Miami River.
One plan calls for an 82-story tower in place of the Courtyard Marriott, and another for three towers, including possibly a hotel and micro-apartments, on the site of the James L. Knight Center and the Hyatt Regency, according to records submitted and a presentation given to the city.
Miami Convention Hotel Corp. wants to demolish the Marriott hotel at 200 SE Second Ave. and build an 898-foot hotel and residential high-rise with 9,245 square feet of retail, according to an application submitted to the city.
The project, aptly named 2nd and 2nd for its location is the southwest corner of Southeast Second Street and Second Avenue, could have 637 residential units, 266 hotel rooms and 553 parking spaces, according to the proposal.
Separately, a plan to redevelop the site of the riverfront Hyatt Regency Miami and the James L. Knight Center at 400 SE Second Ave. is also in play.
Hyatt and the city have been in discussions for a couple of years, but the Miami City Commission in July 2017 stopped short of sending the plan to voters in a November referendum.
The city owns the 4-acre property under the hotel and convention center. Hyatt Equities LLC owns the hotel building and leases the land where its hotel stands, according to a draft, unsigned April 3 memo between Hyatt and the city.
The tentative plan calls for Hyatt to expand its existing lease to include the rest of the property, extend its lease for 99 years, demolish the hotel and Knight Center, and redevelop the entire property.
The project would produce three towers including an 800-room Hyatt hotel and 450 to 500 micro-apartments, plus more public open space for pedestrian access to the site and the river, according to a presentation Hyatt representatives gave to the city Waterfront Advisory Board on April 10.
The city-owned and privately managed Knight Center has averaged the city less than $40,000 annually in income, but the site redevelopment could bring in more revenue, Daniel Rotenberg, the city's director of the Department of Real Estate Asset Management, told the board. Meeting space would be in the new hotel.
“We are going to step back because the value and the income we get from it is pretty de minimis. This way by removing that entire James L. Knight Center, we open up a lot of land for development,” Rotenberg said.
Hyatt would pay the city rent starting at $500,000 annually and escalating to either $2 million annually or a percentage of revenue, whichever is higher, according to the memo.
The site plan is preliminary as Hyatt and the city are working to come up with something that aligns with their visions. CBRE Inc. has been hired to help with the development plan.
Hyatt is to seek development partners andsubmit a master plan within a year after the memo is signed.
TALLER, BIGGER
Both proposals could lead to taller, denser downtown development.
The proposed 82-story tower would be much bigger than surrounding buildings. Not only would it be taller than the existing 14-story Marriott, which has 208 rooms and 25 suites, but it also would be taller than the adjacent landmark 47-story Miami Tower.
The proposed 800 rooms for the new Hyatt would make it bigger than the existing 615-room Hyatt Regency as well as bigger than the 313-room JW Marriott Marquis Miami and the 411-room boutique Kimpton EPIC Hotel east of the Hyatt.
The Hyatt property proposal would need approval from city voters in a referendum and two City Commission votes.
The 2nd and 2nd hotel-residences project is coming up for discussion Wednesday at the Urban Development Review Board.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250