Miami Sues Drugmakers, Distributors for Opioid Crisis
Miami joins other jurisdictions blaming drugmakers and distributors for opioid deaths and overdoses.
April 17, 2018 at 04:24 PM
3 minute read
The city of Miami claims pharmaceutical companies and drug distributors deceived opioid users with aggressive marketing tactics into believing their products were safe but in reality contributed to the opioid epidemic affecting millions of Americans.
Lawyers representing the city filed a lawsuit Monday under Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act against a host of pharmaceutical companies and distributors led by Purdue Pharma LP, maker of the widely prescribed OxyContin, as well as Janssen, Ortho-McNeil, AmerisourceBergen and Walgreens.
The city blamed drug sales representatives for aggressively targeting doctors for in-person marketing and giving them cash payments.
“Sales representatives from Insys [Therapeutics] and Purdue were the most frequent visitors to Miami with at least 1,398 and 368 visits, respectively between the third quarter of 2013 and 2016,” the complaint said. “These visits frequently coincided with payments to the prescriber for 'promotional speaking,' 'food and beverage,' 'consulting,' 'travel and lodging,' 'honoraria' and 'education.' ”
The city claimed drug reps from the defendants paid roughly $340,000 to doctors in the same time frame.
In 2016, 640 opioid overdoses and 1,717 fire-rescue calls involving the opioid antidote Naloxone were counted in Miami, the complaint said.
Purdue posted a statement on its website saying the company has committed “
substantial resources” to fight the opioid epidemic.
“Purdue has supported many initiatives to combat opioid abuse, such as educational programs for healthcare professionals and law enforcement, and prescription monitoring programs,” the company said. “In addition, Purdue has led the development of opioids with abuse-deterrent properties.”
The city also called out several pharmaceutical companies, including Purdue, for cases against them brought by state law enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies for opioid-related conduct.
Purdue and three executives pleaded guilty to federal charges for misleading doctors, patients and regulators about the risk of addiction and OxyContin's abuse potential, the 134-page complaint said.
“As laid out in its plea agreement, Purdue systematically misrepresented the risk of addiction, including promising that opioid addiction occurred in less than 1 percent of patients and that opioids were not addictive when legitimately prescribed,” the Miami-Dade Circuit Court lawsuit said.
In another case involving the painkiller, New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman charged Endo Pharmaceuticals “knew as early as 2011 that Opana was being abused in New York, but certain sales representatives who detailed New York health care providers testified that they did not know about any policy or duty to report problematic conduct,” the complaint said.
Schneiderman found “health care providers who were subsequently arrested or convicted for illegal prescribing of opioids a total of 326 times, and these prescribers collectively wrote 1,370 prescriptions for Opana.”
Julie Braman Kane and Mike Eidson of Colson Hicks Eidson represent the city.
“The opioid epidemic is taking a major toll all across America, and especially in our hometown of Miami,” Kane said. “When corporations aggressively and intentionally take actions that injure people and cause significant harm to our community, the civil justice system holds them accountable.”
The lawsuit follows on the heels of a similar complaint filed April 5 by Palm Beach County against a similar set of drug industry defendants. The county is represented by The Ferraro Law Firm in Miami and New York's Napoli Shkolnik and Stull, Stull & Brody.
Many of the cases have been moved to multidistrict litigation in Ohio federal court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute read'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
US Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readSorry. We Can't Get to Your Case: Judge Speaks Out on Judicial Shortages
Trending Stories
- 1Balch & Bingham Elects New Partners, Adds Litigator From Jones Walker
- 2People in the News—Jan. 16, 2025—McGuireWoods, High Swartz
- 3'Pushed Into Oncoming Traffic': $5.85M Settlement in Mediated Auto Tort
- 4The Marble Palace Blog: Supreme Court Books You Should Read in 2025
- 5Avoiding Legal Risks: Crafting a Strong Do Not Call Policy for Compliance
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250