Nasty Law Firm Breakup Includes Claim Florida Lawyer Stole Clients from Multiple Firms
The plaintiff alleges personal injury attorney Thomas Schmitt left a trail of law firm victims from South Florida to Orlando.
April 18, 2018 at 10:21 AM
5 minute read
Allegations are swirling in a messy law firm breakup.
The fight is so contentious, the plaintiff brought 30 witnesses to an April 12 evidentiary hearing in which both sides sought injunctions.
The plaintiff claims personal injury attorney Thomas Schmitt left a trail of law firm victims from South Florida to Orlando, and took millions of dollars worth of case files each time he left a job. Among the firms named in court pleadings: Steinger Iscoe & Greene, the Law Firm of Goldstein Schmitt & Associates, and Kogan Disalvo & Schmitt.
One former partner, Lauri Goldstein, sued Schmitt, claiming she lost 140 to 170 files when he abruptly left her firm to open a Martin County office for Kogan DiSalvo & Schmitt.
Kogan DiSalvo principals Darryl B. Kogan and Theodore L. DiSalvo did not comment on the latest suit. But when Goldstein battled Schmitt in 2015, she pulled Kogan DiSalvo into the litigation, claiming the firm benefited from her former partner's alleged wrongdoing.
The parties reached a confidential settlement in that case.
But Schmitt alleges Goldstein targeted him for years, pursued him across Florida, and filed lawsuits to force him into bankruptcy.
“When I leave a firm, a lot of clients come with me,” he said.
Schmitt faces suit from a new plaintiff, but suggests a connection between Goldstein and the new litigant: a West Palm Beach attorney, Michael Pike, who's represented both plaintiffs in lawsuits against him.
Now, Schmitt says he's gearing to seek sanctions against his latest plaintiff and Pike for allegedly filing a frivolous motion.
“Pike is doing the same unethical things that he did in the last lawsuit,” Schmitt said. “He files pleadings with scandalous allegations that violate the Rules of Civil Procedure. He attaches documents to pleadings that violate the Rules of Civil Procedure.”
Pike and partner Talina Bidwell represent Schmitt's former employer-turned-opponent, personal injury lawyer Johnny Pineyro, whose company brought the suit. In 2015, he was plaintiff counsel when Goldstein sued Schmitt, DiSalvo and Kogan.
Pike's current client, Pineyro, heads Florida Injury Law Firm P.A. in Celebration, near Kissimmee.
The firm sued Schmitt and his startup, Personal Injury Law Team LLC. It also named Matthew D. Valdes, a former Florida Injury Law Firm attorney who left to work with Schmitt, as a defendant. Valdes did not respond to requests for comment.
Schmitt worked for Florida Injury Law Firm for about nine months from April 2017 as a personal injury attorney. But at his request, he and the firm restructured their agreement to make him an independent contractor.
The plaintiff suggests the move was a ruse.
“Schmitt used the Florida Injury Law Firm as a staging grounds to gain immediate access to approximately 200 clients, establish contact with those clients and then 'pounce' when the time was right, in an effort to steal each and every client,” according to the complaint filed March 9 in Orange Circuit Court.
The litigants met for an April 12 injunction hearing before Orange Circuit Judge Julie H. O'Kane in Orlando. They disputed several issues, including communication with clients and ownership of a trust account.
Pike argued Schmitt misrepresented himself to Florida Injury Law Firm's clients. He alleged the attorney sent a letter incorrectly describing himself as the firm's managing member to make clients think a principal was leaving the firm to start another venture.
The correspondence should have been a joint letter from Schmitt and the firm to inform clients of the departure, and notify them of their options to leave with the attorney, remain with the firm, or seek other representation.
But instead, Schmitt used Pineyro's electronic signature on the document without telling the other attorney or showing him the document. He said the independent contractor agreement allowed him to send the document.
“I have had experience in the past where employers have refused to send the joint letters,” Schmitt told O'Kane, according to a copy of the court transcript.
“I don't care about that,” the judge interjected.
“That's the reason why it was sent that way,” Schmitt said.
The judge seemed unconvinced and ordered the parties to send clients a new letter. Pineyro must authorize the document and his firm must be responsible for getting the correspondence to clients.
“And the letter is to bear actual signatures, as opposed to electronic signatures, of both Mr. Pineyro and Mr. Schmitt,” O'Kane ruled.
Pike will likely use that exchange to fend off any motion for sanctions.
“How in the world can Mr. Schmitt claim I'm unethical when he admitted in open court to using Mr. Pineyro's signature without authorization?” he told the Daily Business Review.
The judge ordered the litigants to enter mediation by April 30 and to return May 21 for a pretrial conference.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250