Southwest Airlines Passengers Looking to Lawyer Up After Emergency Landing
Less than 24 hours after a Dallas-bound Southwest Airlines jet made an emergency landing in Philadelphia Tuesday, attorney Ladd Sanger had already fielded two calls from passengers.
April 18, 2018 at 06:33 PM
4 minute read
Less than 24 hours after a Dallas-bound Southwest Airlines jet made an emergency landing in Philadelphia Tuesday, attorney Ladd Sanger had already fielded two calls from passengers on that flight.
By midafternoon Wednesday, former passengers on Southwest Flight 1380 were making inquiries with Sanger's Texas-based aviation law firm, a sign of litigation brewing over the airline's engine failure.
The callers had witnessed a woman, Jennifer Riordan, almost sucked out of a shattered window of a plane traveling about 30,000 feet above the ground. Riordan died, despite efforts from other passengers to pull her back into the plane and resuscitate her.
“They're looking to see what their rights are,” said Sanger, managing partner of Slack Davis Sanger's Dallas office. “We suspect there are going to be claims by passengers against the airline and engine manufacturer.”
The attorney wouldn't say whether Slack Davis agreed to represent any of the callers, but one thing was clear: Lawyers are mulling what sort of litigation might be in the works.
A class action could be in play, but there would be several hurdles.
“The trouble is there has to be some kind of commonality of damages,” said Cozen O'Connor New York member Christopher Kende, who focuses on international insurance, reinsurance, aviation and marine litigation.
Potential claims over the Southwest Airlines flight could include wrongful death and trauma. Any plaintiffs would have to overcome the “numerosity” requirement, and show that a collective suit would be more efficient than multiple proceedings.
Attorneys say it's also still too early to determine how litigation could shape up in a situation potentially involving residents of multiple states, who might be bound by varying rules in their home jurisdiction.
Also still in play: breach-of-contract claims.
“Anybody that flies on any airline has a contract of passage,” said airline attorney Mark A. Dombroff, outside general counsel to the Aviation Emergency Response Organization and former director of the Department of Justice's aviation and admiralty section. “When you purchase a ticket on an airline, the contract is they will deliver you safely from Point A to Point B.”
Attorneys agree the airline would likely move to avoid litigation over the event that has grabbed international headlines.
“They will aggressively seek to resolve any claim,” Dombroff said. “Southwest is an incredibly good airline in terms of not only customer service, but in terms of operation and maintenance.”
Southwest did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but posted updates to its social media accounts.
“Safety is always our top priority at Southwest Airlines, and we are working diligently to support our customers and crews at this time,” the company tweeted Tuesday.
Federal regulations also limit the scope of the airline's public comments as the National Transportation Safety Board investigates. Instead, the NTSB provides daily public briefings to release its latest finding.
In the meantime, passengers have been posting their accounts on social media, describing the event in harrowing detail.
Attorneys say this could weigh against potential defendants if a case reached a jury. With no chance of assigning blame to the passengers, defendants would have to shoulder all the responsibility.
Dombroff suggests Southwest's counsel could rely on the agency to help fact-check other reports emerging in the frenzy following the event. The former Dentons attorney has represented Southwest, Virgin America, Spirit Airlines, US Airways and others.
“Social media has made everybody a reporter,” said Dombroff, of LeClairRyan in Alexandria, Virginia. “If I was representing the airline, I would want to make sure that the speculation machine doesn't get out of hand. … We don't need to speculate here. All we have to do is just be a little be patient.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250