Why FIU Dominates the Florida Bar Exam
Eighty-five percent of FIU's first-time test takers sitting the bar exam in February passed.
April 18, 2018 at 01:04 PM
5 minute read
When it comes to earning the top spot for performance on the Florida Bar exam, the secret's in the hands-on training.
At least that's how Florida International University acting law dean Tawia B. Ansah explains FIU's No. 1 ranking, outpacing all others as the school with the highest percentage of first-time candidates succeeding on the bar exam.
“You can take really good bar-prep courses … but if the leadup to that isn't sufficient, it's going to show up in the results,” said Ansah, a Columbia University graduate who teaches contracts, international business transactions, conflict of laws, professional responsibility and jurisprudence/legal theory. “I think our students are doing well on the bar because they're learning how to write well and communicate well, and they're learning communication skills throughout the program.”
Eighty-five percent of FIU's first-time test takers passed the February exam, according to the results the Florida Board of Bar Examiners released Monday. Last year, 87.8 percent passed the July exam, which has a much larger pool.
At the heart of FIU's law curriculum is its mandatory legal skills and values program with three prongs over three semesters.
Marketing materials describe it as a “simulated law-practice environment” — a key component of student success, according to Ansah.
The goal: teach written and oral communications skills, research techniques, ethics and client
relations.
In the first semester, students assume the role of legal interns. They research civil and criminal legal issues, draft predictive office memoranda and supplement that work with an oral report to a faculty member acting as a supervising attorney.
In the second term, the focus shifts to advocacy.
“'They get much more into the real nitty-gritty of law practice,” Ansah said.
Students gain practical experience by preparing a pretrial motion memorandum,
researching and drafting a multi-issue appellate brief and then presenting oral argument to a three-judge panel of practicing attorneys. The attorney-judges critique each argument.
By the third semester, the simulation casts students as practicing attorneys, tasked with representing a client from the inception of a legal problem to its resolution. It requires them to draft client and demand letters, prepare contracts and other transactional documents, negotiate with other “attorneys,” and draft pleadings, motions and supporting memoranda.
All stages require students to apply the bar's professionalism rules.
“The idea is they don't just go into a law firm with a head full of legal writing but no knowledge on how to execute that,” Ansah said. “If you're given that sort of preparation, then a bar exam is just one more thing along the way.”
University officials also attribute the success to an “Academic Excellence Program” by a faculty that includes Professors Louis Schulze and Raul Ruiz. They offer training on legal reasoning, analysis and writing, and help students apply those skills the bar exam.
The payoff is almost immediate.
About 87 percent of FIU's 2017 graduates found full-time, long-term employment within months, according to the university's submission to the American Bar Association's Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar.
Most new graduates work in small Florida firms with two to 10 attorneys, and about 28 percent take public-sector jobs, according to the filing.
“A school does many things to prepare itself, not only for success on the bar but success in the bar,” Ansah said.
Other institutions saw room for improvement and acknowledged the need for more structure.
The University of Florida Levin College of Law, for instance, came in last on the February exam with a 31.8 percent success rate. A statement attributed to its dean, Laura A. Rosenbury, called the “shocking” results “a clear wake-up call.”
“The results are utterly unacceptable given the caliber of our students and the quality of their education,” according to the email. “The efforts we undertook prior to the February bar exam were clearly insufficient. We will be increasing the support we provide to the students taking the July 2018 bar exam. We have a long tradition at UF Law of respecting our students' autonomy and control over the courses they take. Given these shocking and disheartening results, we are rethinking this approach and doubling down on our intervention strategy.”
FIU has about a 30 percent acceptance rate, enrolling 147 students in its October 2016-2017 first-year class, according to details in the Miami public university's mandatory public disclosures. Its incoming class typically has undergraduate GPAs of 3.65 and a 156 score — on a scale of 120 to 180 — on the standardized Law School Admission Test.
Most succeeded on their first attempt at the exam, which in February felled nearly 40 percent of all candidates looking to practice law in Florida, according to data from the state Supreme Court.
FIU beat out the University of Miami, which took second place in July with an 84.2 percent pass rate, and Florida State University, which came in third with 83.9 percent, as 3,247 applicants sat for the summer test.
FIU typically vies with the private UM for top pass rates, but the latest round of scores showed UM tied for fourth place with Stetson University.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250