West Palm Beach Attorney Wins $3.6 Million Verdict in Blood Filter MDL
“The short story is this was a human experiment that went terribly wrong,” plaintiff lawyer Joe Johnson said.
April 23, 2018 at 04:41 PM
4 minute read
|
West Palm Beach personal injury attorney Joseph R. Johnson of Babbitt & Johnson helped cinch a $3.6 million verdict in bellwether multidistrict litigation involving vascular filters.
Johnson handled most of the trial work in the case that returned a multimillion-dollar verdict from a jury in Phoenix. As a member of the plaintiff's steering committee, he's helping wrangle hundreds of lawsuits over medical devices designed to prevent fatal blood clots.
“This was a medical device put on the market without safety testing,” Johnson said. “Real people in the real world were subjects in a massive experiment and suffered terribly.”
The case is part of a rising wave of litigation alleging faulty vascular filters caused death and injury.
The suits target manufacturers like Miami Lakes-based Cordis Corp., a former Johnson & Johnson subsidiary sold to Cardinal Health Inc. for about $2 billion in 2015. That company has 21 other cases pending against it in state court in California.
Cordis is one of at least three major manufacturers facing widespread litigation hinged on claims IVC filters punctured veins, migrated to other parts of the body or caused organ damage and other major medical complications.
Indiana-based Cook Medical and Georgia-based Bard Medical Division face about 5,800 IVC filter lawsuits in federal court. Thousands of pending cases have been consolidated into two MDLs with lawsuits against Cook moved to Indiana and Bard's playing out in Arizona.
Johnson's work helped secure a major victory against C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. for clients bringing a medical device products liability claim alleging the companies' G2 inferior vena cava filter caused major injury.
“The device failed miserably,” Johnson said. “The short story is this was a human experiment that went terribly wrong.”
IVC filters are umbrella-like devices that are supposed to stop blood clots from moving further in the bloodstream. They are meant to protect the heart and lungs by preventing fatal blood clots from reaching these organs.
However, mounting lawsuits claim manufacturing defects endanger patients by making the filters prone to fracture, disintegration and migration through the bloodstream.
Johnson said a regulatory loophole allows manufacturers to bring devices to market without proper testing.
Food and Drug Administration regulations allow manufacturers to sign documentation assuring new products are “as safe or safer” than similar devices already on the market.
“The process is predicated upon what I call the honor code,” Johnson said. “If a device manufacturer does not report in an honest way to the FDA, then the system falls apart, which is what we believe happened in this case with this filter.”
Johnson client Sherr-Una Booker learned the hard way, according to her court pleadings.
Booker received an IVC implant in 2007, but the device shifted out of place. Its struts perforated the walls of her vena cava, a large vein that carries blood to the heart. It then punctured her heart and organs as it broke apart.
“These filters were migrating out of position, tilting into the largest vein into the human body,” Johnson said.
He teamed with Atlanta solo practitioner Robin Lourie; Robert Roll of Atlanta's Watkins Lourie Roll & Chance; Mark O'Connor of Phoenix's Gallagher & Kennedy; Ramon Lopez of Newport Beach, California's Lopez McHugh; and Julia Reed Zaic of Laguna Beach, California's Heaviside Reed Zaic.
They persuaded a federal jury in Arizona to side with Booker in the first bellwether trial over thousands of complaints.
Jurors awarded $3.6 million: $1.6 million in compensatory damages and $2 million in punitive damages.
Defense counsel included Richard North and Kate Helm of Nelson Mullins, and and James Condo of Snell & Wilmer. They did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
BOOKER V. BARD
Case: Sherr-Una Booker v. C.R. Bard and Bard Peripheral Vascular
Case no.: MDL 15-02641-PHX-DGC and CV-16-00474-PHX-DGC
Description: Products liability
Filing date: Feb. 22, 2016
Verdict date: March 30, 2018
Judge: U.S. District Judge David G. Campbell
Plaintiffs attorneys: Joseph R. Johnson, Babbitt & Johnson, West Palm Beach; Ramon R. Lopez, Lopez McHugh; Mark O'Connor, Gallagher & Kennedy; Julia Zaic, Heaviside Reed Zaic; David DeGreeff, Wagstaff & Cartmell; Hadley Matarazzo, Faraci Lange; and Josh Mankoff, Lopez McHugh
Defense attorneys: Richard North and Kate Helm, Nelson Mullins, and James Condo, Snell & Wilmer
Verdict amount: $3.6 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250