Ex-Miami Lawyer Who Aided Drug Cartel Fails to Get Back Into Florida Bar
The Florida Board of Bar Examiners recommended that the Florida Supreme Court grant the request, but a divided high court Thursday denied it.
May 03, 2018 at 03:13 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court refused Thursday to reinstate the bar license of a former Miami criminal defense attorney who pleaded guilty to aiding members of the Cali cartel.
The Florida Board of Bar Examiners recommended granting the request from ex-attorney Donald L. Ferguson, but a divided high court denied the request for readmission.
Ferguson, 71, has not practiced law in Florida for more than 22 years but is a member in good standing of the Maine Bar. He was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1973 and worked as an assistant U.S. attorney before going into private practice.
That work led him to face criminal charges of his own.
In 1995, federal prosecutors charged him with money laundering and conspiracy to obstruct justice. About four years later, Ferguson pleaded guilty to both charges, and was sentenced to two years in prison and three years' supervised release.
Ferguson was later indicted on federal charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and four counts of money laundering for accepting about $565,000 in cash to defend a client facing a first-degree murder charge. He pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to receive and deposit narcotics proceeds and was sentenced to five years' probation to run concurrently with his supervised release.
More trouble followed when Ferguson failed to pay personal federal income taxes from 1996-2008 and 2010-2011. Liens were filed against him for unpaid taxes from 1996-1999 and 2000-2002. He faced civil penalties but no criminal tax charges.
The conviction for conspiracy to obstruct justice stemmed from allegations the attorney notarized affidavits that made false statements to protect a high-ranking Cali cartel member arrested for drug smuggling conspiracy.
The state Supreme Court suspended his law license after he entered the guilty pleas, and the bar filed a complaint against him 1999. In response, Ferguson filed an unopposed petition for disciplinary resignation. The high court, which has the final word on attorney discipline, allowed him to resign in 2000.
A New York Times article on the Ferguson case shows he claimed he was not aware of any false statements because the affidavits were in Spanish, which he did not understand. Ferguson did not represent the defendant but notarized the affidavits on the request of a lawyer at a Washington law firm that sent him lucrative criminal defense cases, according to the Florida Supreme Court ruling.
That same Washington law firm led to Ferguson's money laundering conviction. It sent him $75,000 in cash, which Ferguson then turned over to a defendant's wife, who used the money to get her husband released on bond.
“He delivered the money for the same reason he notarized the false affidavits: because he was asked to do so by the people who were sending him lucrative legal business and he did not want to 'ruffle feathers,' ” according to the unsigned opinion by Chief Justice Jorge Labarga and Justices R. Fred Lewis, Charles T. Canady and Ricky Polston.
Justices C. Alan Lawson, Barbara J. Pariente and Peggy A. Quince dissented.
Ferguson has since paid his taxes, volunteered thousands of hours to area nonprofits and made a ethics presentation to a law school class describing his illegal activities and steps toward rehabilitation. He made an unsuccessful attempt at readmission in 2014 and tried again in 2016.
This time, the bar examiners found in his favor, but the majority of justices rejected the recommendation.
Writing for the minority, Lawson said Ferguson proved his rehabilitation and suggested the court had an “ unsettlingly arbitrary” reason for its denial.
“I do not understand quibbling about whether 791 hours of volunteer service with Boca Helping Hands between 2011 and 2017 … constitute sufficient 'extra effort to overcome his past mistakes,' ” the justice wrote in dissent. “ Notions of fundamental fairness dictate that if the basis for our rejection of Mr. Ferguson's application for readmission is really too few community service hours, we should at least tell him how many hours we think it would take, in the next two years, to atone for his past misconduct. Without that type of guidance, in the rules or elsewhere, the decision to reject Ferguson's application for readmission on this basis alone appears unsettlingly arbitrary.”
Ferguson could not be reached for comment by deadline. His attorney in the readmission proceedings, John A. Weiss of Rumberger Kirk & Caldwell in Tallahassee, Florida, declined to comment. His former criminal defense attorney, Neal R. Sonnett in Miami, also declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250