Attorney of the Year Finalist — Peter Prieto
The Takata air bag litigation preoccupied Prieto in 2017, consuming up to 80 percent of his time as vehicle owners landed settlements valued at $1.2 billion.
May 07, 2018 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
PETER PRIETO
Podhurst Orseck
Peter Prieto didn't raise his hand when U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno was looking for someone to lead the plaintiffs' side in the Takata air bag multidistrict litigation, but Prieto accepted when the assignment was offered.
Prieto was appointed in March 2015, and the plaintiffs filed their first motion to approve four settlements in May 2017, “so 2017 was the year that all of these cases, through either litigation or settlement, really came to fruition.”
Economic loss settlements were approved last October for Toyota, BMW, Mazda and Subaru. Settlement motions followed for Honda and Nissan, and they were approved in February. The combined valued of the agreements is about $1.2 billion.
“The Takata MDL is really one of the top two or three large MDLs in the country. Rarely do MDLs have eight defendants,” and another four were added recently, Prieto said. The new additions were General Motors, Fiat-Chrysler, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen.
“It's really hard to manage that kind of litigation,” he said. “I tell people the practice of law is simple. Dealing with lawyers is the difficult thing. It's the reality.”
Prieto was responsible for coordinating the work of seven leadership firms, and about 20 other firms were on board for document review, depositions and other expertise.
“You're creating a virtual law firm by just putting together these law firms,” he said. “For the most part, we knew them, but it's still a challenge to work and coordinate with everyone and make sure everyone is rowing in the same direction.”
The first settlements provided the overall structure. Prieto explained, “We wanted to make sure whatever position we took with one defendant didn't hurt us with another.”
But the litigation involving each defendant was “completely different,” he said. Ford, for one, hasn't settled.
Takata was the initial defendant and filed for bankruptcy protection, requiring the plaintiffs to hire bankruptcy counsel. The primary objective for the air bag plaintiffs was to avoid the standard bankruptcy litigation stay. A stay was denied in Delaware in the only exception allowed by the bankruptcy judge.
The Takata MDL has required a lot of travel, “not every week, but there were spurts there where we were traveling to New York every week.”
The assignment “came out of the blue. I wasn't expecting it,” Prieto said. “It's been a great experience. It's been stressful but interesting and instructive.”
Vehicles produced by 19 automakers with Takata air bags are covered by the largest recall in U.S. history, estimated to affect more than 37 million vehicles.
Prieto had other things to do than serve as chair lead counsel in the Takata MDL, but it has dominated his time.
“I actually worked on other stuff, but 70 to 80 percent of my time was primarily devoted to Takata,” he said.
Prieto's law firm, Podhurst Orseck, is a Miami litigation boutique noted for playing outsized roles in major national class actions and MDLs.
The other things on Prieto's plate include serving as the only Florida lawyer on the plaintiffs executive committee in the GM ignition switch litigation, chair of the experts committee in the Blue Cross Blue Shield MDL in Alabama, a member of the plaintiffs' executive committee in the checking account overdraft MDL and lead counsel in Miami-Dade County's opioid case against the pharmaceutical industry.
And the Takata litigation is about to gear up again soon on the four defendants added in March.
Prieto previously served as the executive partner of Holland & Knight's Miami office and led its litigation department. He also was a Miami federal prosecutor and served in the independent counsel's office in Washington working on the criminal investigation of the late Commerce Secretary Ron Brown.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGrowing Referral Network, Alternative Fees Have This Ex-Big Law’s Atty’s Bankruptcy Practice Soaring
5 minute readAgainst the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
4 minute readMiami Civil Judge Myriam Lehr to Say Goodbye to the County Court Bench
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250