The Evolving South Florida Law Firm Office: Smaller Spaces, Multipurpose Rooms
The size, look and feel of law offices is changing across the U.S., and South Florida firms are embracing the trends to varying degrees.
May 09, 2018 at 01:53 PM
5 minute read
The evolution of law firm real estate — from a reduction of office size and an emphasis on amenities to making all offices the same size or sharing them — has taken hold across South Florida to varying degrees.
CBRE Inc. research, including a 2017 Legal-Sector-Trends national and a regional study, shows firms are already implementing or evaluating changes to their real estate.
Among the South Florida trends are shrinking the traditional threshold of 800 to 1,000 square feet per lawyer to 550 to 700 square feet, and reducing support staff from one for every two to four lawyers to one for every five to 10, according to the study released in March.
South Florida law firm representatives discussed how their real estate is evolving Wednesday in a session at CBRE's Miami office in the Brickell Financial District, which is also home to many firms large and small.
About two years ago, Akerman moved its Miami office from the downtown SunTrust International Center to Three Brickell City Centre, where all attorneys regardless of seniority have the same size office — 170 square feet, said former chairman Andrew Smulian.
“There was a little bit of trepidation at first. I think (there was ) more concern whether the glass will remain clear or we will frost the glass,” Smulian said.
But not all firms have embraced this equitable approach.
Bilzin Sumberg and Shutts & Bowen still have varying office sizes.
“Part of that is legacy and part of that is a focus on we need the partners to still have meetings with clients in their office,” said Albert Dotson, Bilzin Sumberg managing partner-elect.
Shutts & Bowen considered a universal office size but ended up with two — larger for partners and smaller for associates.
“Some of it is dictated by the floor plan,” said Frederick O'Malley, Shutts & Bowen chief operating officer.
The firm, however, decreased the space per attorney, echoing one of the findings in the CBRE studies.
When the law firm moved its downtown Miami office in November 2015, both partners and associates moved into smaller offices, O'Malley said. Shutts & Bowen moved across the street from the Miami Center to the Southeast Financial Center.
While room per attorney decreased, Shutts & Bowen still kept the same total size when it moved and repurposed the remaining square footage as conference and multipurpose space, O'Malley said.
Panelists noted meeting space is another aspect being evaluated.
“We needed more conference space and more common space. We were having a lot of difficulty with client meeting. And we also went to multipurpose space that could be subdivided. We have one of our larger spaces that could be divided to make one large meeting room or to make two,” O'Malley said.
TIME TO CONFER
Holland & Knight also has changed its approach to conference rooms.
“The traditional law firm has an entryway conference room and then offices in the back,” said Vivian de las Cuevas-Diaz, a Holland & Knight partner.
The 33rd floor of the firm's Brickell office is its conference center, and all other floors have smaller conference rooms, de las Cuevas-Diaz said.
The 24th floor is a hybrid mix with a traditional large conference room as well as smaller meeting spaces.
“We took the best of both worlds,” she said.
Across U.S. cities, the average reduction in law firm square footage was 27 percent from 2010 to 2017, according to the CBRE study.
But a closer look shows firms might be finding other ways to reduce attorney space, such as breaking away from the traditional one-office-per-lawyer setup and having two or three lawyers work in the same office.
“In some of our offices, we are already seeing the joint-space for associates or the open space for our lobbying group,” de las Cuevas-Diaz said.
But she cautioned there might be issues with confidentiality.
“I am probably fine with two associates in an office. I think from a partner perspective, one of the things that I personally am concerned with is confidentiality. There's just a lot of concerns, whether it's management of the firm or clients, that I just don't see how we can openly air. I think that's going to be a challenge that I think all law firms face,” de las Cuevas-Diaz said
And despite all the talk about more industries allowing employees to work remotely from home, in the legal field at least the office is here to stay — just in a different form than before.
“We all spend, even with this flexible schedule, a lot more time in our offices than we do anywhere else,” de las Cuevas-Diaz said. “I think the one thing all law firms have it clear is how do we make that environment the best possible. We just all do it a little differently.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Eckert Seamans Sues Former Client Over $300K in Unpaid Legal Fees
- 2Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
- 3Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
- 4Gold Medal Grift? Caitlyn Jenner Accused in Crypto Fraud Scheme
- 5Jay Clayton, Ex-SEC Chief and Sullivan & Cromwell Lawyer, Eyed For Manhattan US Attorney's Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250