The Evolving South Florida Law Firm Office: Smaller Spaces, Multipurpose Rooms
The size, look and feel of law offices is changing across the U.S., and South Florida firms are embracing the trends to varying degrees.
May 09, 2018 at 01:53 PM
5 minute read
The evolution of law firm real estate — from a reduction of office size and an emphasis on amenities to making all offices the same size or sharing them — has taken hold across South Florida to varying degrees.
CBRE Inc. research, including a 2017 Legal-Sector-Trends national and a regional study, shows firms are already implementing or evaluating changes to their real estate.
Among the South Florida trends are shrinking the traditional threshold of 800 to 1,000 square feet per lawyer to 550 to 700 square feet, and reducing support staff from one for every two to four lawyers to one for every five to 10, according to the study released in March.
South Florida law firm representatives discussed how their real estate is evolving Wednesday in a session at CBRE's Miami office in the Brickell Financial District, which is also home to many firms large and small.
About two years ago, Akerman moved its Miami office from the downtown SunTrust International Center to Three Brickell City Centre, where all attorneys regardless of seniority have the same size office — 170 square feet, said former chairman Andrew Smulian.
“There was a little bit of trepidation at first. I think (there was ) more concern whether the glass will remain clear or we will frost the glass,” Smulian said.
But not all firms have embraced this equitable approach.
Bilzin Sumberg and Shutts & Bowen still have varying office sizes.
“Part of that is legacy and part of that is a focus on we need the partners to still have meetings with clients in their office,” said Albert Dotson, Bilzin Sumberg managing partner-elect.
Shutts & Bowen considered a universal office size but ended up with two — larger for partners and smaller for associates.
“Some of it is dictated by the floor plan,” said Frederick O'Malley, Shutts & Bowen chief operating officer.
The firm, however, decreased the space per attorney, echoing one of the findings in the CBRE studies.
When the law firm moved its downtown Miami office in November 2015, both partners and associates moved into smaller offices, O'Malley said. Shutts & Bowen moved across the street from the Miami Center to the Southeast Financial Center.
While room per attorney decreased, Shutts & Bowen still kept the same total size when it moved and repurposed the remaining square footage as conference and multipurpose space, O'Malley said.
Panelists noted meeting space is another aspect being evaluated.
“We needed more conference space and more common space. We were having a lot of difficulty with client meeting. And we also went to multipurpose space that could be subdivided. We have one of our larger spaces that could be divided to make one large meeting room or to make two,” O'Malley said.
TIME TO CONFER
Holland & Knight also has changed its approach to conference rooms.
“The traditional law firm has an entryway conference room and then offices in the back,” said Vivian de las Cuevas-Diaz, a Holland & Knight partner.
The 33rd floor of the firm's Brickell office is its conference center, and all other floors have smaller conference rooms, de las Cuevas-Diaz said.
The 24th floor is a hybrid mix with a traditional large conference room as well as smaller meeting spaces.
“We took the best of both worlds,” she said.
Across U.S. cities, the average reduction in law firm square footage was 27 percent from 2010 to 2017, according to the CBRE study.
But a closer look shows firms might be finding other ways to reduce attorney space, such as breaking away from the traditional one-office-per-lawyer setup and having two or three lawyers work in the same office.
“In some of our offices, we are already seeing the joint-space for associates or the open space for our lobbying group,” de las Cuevas-Diaz said.
But she cautioned there might be issues with confidentiality.
“I am probably fine with two associates in an office. I think from a partner perspective, one of the things that I personally am concerned with is confidentiality. There's just a lot of concerns, whether it's management of the firm or clients, that I just don't see how we can openly air. I think that's going to be a challenge that I think all law firms face,” de las Cuevas-Diaz said
And despite all the talk about more industries allowing employees to work remotely from home, in the legal field at least the office is here to stay — just in a different form than before.
“We all spend, even with this flexible schedule, a lot more time in our offices than we do anywhere else,” de las Cuevas-Diaz said. “I think the one thing all law firms have it clear is how do we make that environment the best possible. We just all do it a little differently.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250