Florida Taxpayers and Businesses May Benefit From Opportunity Zones
Soon, individual and corporate taxpayers in Florida and elsewhere in the United States may have the choice of investing their 2018-2025 capital gains in “Qualified Opportunity Funds” rather than paying income taxes currently on such gains.
May 10, 2018 at 10:13 AM
4 minute read
Soon, individual and corporate taxpayers in Florida and elsewhere in the United States may have the choice of investing their 2018-2025 capital gains in “Qualified Opportunity Funds” rather than paying income taxes currently on such gains. Qualified Opportunity Funds are funds that will focus on investing in designated economically disadvantaged census tracts, called “opportunity zones,” located in Florida and other U.S. states and territories.
Gains from 2018 invested in Qualified Opportunity Funds within 180 days of the sale will not be subject to federal capital gains taxes for 2018. Rather, 2018 capital gains invested in Qualified Opportunity Funds in 2018 will generally have to be included in income only in 2026, and apparently only at most in a 15-percent reduced amount. For capital gains recognized and invested in Qualified Opportunity Funds between 2019 and 2025, the deferral benefit and tax reduction on the original gain, still recognized in 2026, is reduced somewhat or eliminated. Although the gains rolled over between 2018 through 2025 are predominantly or entirely included in 2026, any post-investment appreciation in a Qualified Opportunity Fund investment after 10 years, when such investment is sold or liquidated, will be exempt from federal income tax. A goal of the opportunity zone program is to attract gains, including, but not limited to, the trillions of dollars in as yet unrecognized 2018 appreciation in stock of publicly traded corporations, for use in opportunity zones.
On April 19, Gov. Rick Scott nominated to the U.S. Treasury Florida census tracts proposed for designation as opportunity zones. A list and map of these nominated Florida census tracts can be found at: http://www.floridajobs.org/business-growth-and-partnerships/for-businesses-and-entrepreneurs/business-resource/opportunity-zones. The nominated census tracts constitute about 10 percent of all the census tracts in Florida. The U.S. Treasury Department has up to 60 days to certify Gov. Scott's nominations. The other U.S. states likewise have submitted their selected census tracts for certification to the U.S. Treasury, and many census tracts throughout the U.S. have already been designated as opportunity zones.
Once certified as an opportunity zone, a census tract becomes an eligible focus for investment by Qualified Opportunity Funds. A Qualified Opportunity Fund is a partnership or corporation which is certified by the U.S. Treasury Department and which invests 90 percent of its assets in “Qualified Opportunity Zone Property.” Qualified Opportunity Zone Property is a cash investment in originally issued stock of a corporate “Qualified Opportunity Zone Business,” a cash investment in originally issued partnership interests of a partnership Qualified Opportunity Zone Business, or the assets of a directly owned and operated Qualified Opportunity Zone Business.
A Qualified Opportunity Zone Business is generally defined as a business, substantially all of whose owned or leased real estate and equipment is “Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Property.” Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Property is property acquired by purchase, the original use of which in the Qualified Opportunity Zone begins with the Qualified Opportunity Zone Business (except that certain substantially renovated buildings can qualify), and whose only substantial use is in a Qualified Opportunity Zone.
There are some technical issues which forthcoming Treasury Regulations and perhaps technical corrections legislation will need to address, such as the requirements for certification as a Qualified Opportunity Fund, the types of property whose gain is eligible for rollover, whether pre-2026 Qualified Opportunity Fund distributions can terminate the rolled-over gain deferral, and what anti-abuse rules can apply.
The opportunity zone program differs significantly from the existing New Markets Tax Credit program, which is widely used in Florida and elsewhere in the United States. The New Markets Tax Credit program involves a competition run by the Treasury Department among intermediary funds, called “Community Development Entities,” for a fixed amount of federal income tax credits the funds can then provide to their investors. By contrast, the opportunity zone program has no application process for, nor fixed dollar limit on, the capital gain deferral and post-investment capital gains tax exemption benefits that the IRS allows Qualified Opportunity Funds to provide their investors. Thus, only the private market will determine how large the Qualified Opportunity Fund program will become.
On the other hand, Qualified Opportunity Zones are also typically served by Community Development Entities. This creates possible synergies between the New Markets Tax Credit program and the Opportunity Zone program. For example, a Qualified Opportunity Zone Business might borrow low-interest-rate loans from a Community Development Entity.
For long-term investors, Qualified Opportunity Funds may be an attractive investment. For Florida law firms, the opportunity zone program may provide significant business opportunities for their securities, corporate, real estate, tax, and other departments.
Alan Lederman is a tax shareholder with Gunster in Fort Lauderdale.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 2Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 3Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 4Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 5Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250