Former Judge Moody Tops Money Chase in Attorney General Race
“Judge Ashley Moody continues to outraise and outperform her Republican primary opponents with each and every campaign finance reporting period,” Moody campaign manager Nick Catroppo said in a statement Friday.
May 14, 2018 at 10:56 AM
4 minute read
With more than $300,000 in contributions in April, attorney general candidate Ashley Moody wants everyone to know she's outpacing her Republican opponents in raising money for their August primary battle.
“Judge Ashley Moody continues to outraise and outperform her Republican primary opponents with each and every campaign finance reporting period,” Moody campaign manager Nick Catroppo said in a statement Friday.
The former Hillsborough County judge brought in about $325,000 in April for her campaign account and the political committee Friends of Ashley Moody, positioning her to begin May with $1.7 million on hand, according to newly posted numbers on the state Division of Elections website.
That total remains behind the $2.09 million available to GOP primary opponent Frank White, a state House member from Pensacola who has put more than $1.5 million of his own money into the campaign.
White received $161,747 in contributions in April for his campaign account and the political committee known as United Conservatives. That included $71,700 from auto dealers, $46,250 from developers and $14,100 from contributors tied to the energy industry.
The auto money included $50,000 from Sansing Holdings, where White serves as general counsel and chief financial officer for the chain of Sandy Sansing auto dealerships. White's also received $31,000 from D.A.B. Constructors of Inglis and $10,000 from Gulf Power, the largest electricity provider in Northwest Florida.
Meanwhile, fellow Republican candidate Jay Fant, a state House member from Jacksonville, posted $18,065 for the month through his campaign account and the political committee called Pledge This Day.
Fant, whose contributions included a $9,000 check from Jacksonville investor Robert Cook and $4,500 from lawyers and law firms, ended April with $838,929 on hand.
During the early stages of the campaign, Fant has aggressively targeted Moody, trying to portray her as a liberal and as having the backing of trial lawyers.
But while Fant has put $750,000 of his own money into the race, Moody has drawn more contributions.
Moody's April contributions included $107,077 from development, construction and real estate fields, $43,150 from the financial-services industry and $33,050 from lawyers. Another $50,000 came from political organizations, including $25,000 from the Treasure Coast Alliance, a political committee led by outgoing Senate President Joe Negron, R-Stuart.
Moody also received $1,000 from Friends of Dana Young, the political committee of Sen. Dana Young, R-Tampa, and $10,000 from the Florida Prosperity Fund, which is tied to the business advocacy group Associated Industries of Florida.
Moody, who has the backing of outgoing Attorney General Pam Bondi, also has continued to take advantage of in-kind support from the Republican Party of Florida.
In April, Moody drew $104,729 in in-kind consulting, staffing and research from the state party, which has now provided her with $233,915 in in-kind assistance.
On the Democratic side of the race for attorney general, state Rep. Sean Shaw of Tampa posted $131,551 in contributions in April to his campaign and the political committee Sean Shaw for Florida, of which $62,150 was from the legal field.
Shaw's political committee received $10,000 from TECO Energy Inc., $10,000 from the Tampa-based law firm Swope, Rodante and $10,000 from the West Palm Beach-based firm Lytal, Reiter, Smith, Ivey & Fronrath. Shaw started May with about $316,000 on hand in the two accounts.
Ryan Torrens, an attorney from Hillsborough County who has been running on the Democratic side since May 2017, picked up $5,328 in April. Torrens, who had raised a total of $100,419, had burned through all but $4,343.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Nov. 26, 2024—Barley Snyder, McNees
- 2Akin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
- 3Walking a Minute in Your Adversary’s Shoes: Addressing the Issue of 'Naive Realism' at Mediation
- 4The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
- 5New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250